Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Addons (Score 4, Insightful) 444

My experience is the opposite. I discovered adblock and never looked back at Privoxy. The user friendliness differences are just staggering. Adblock is a one click install affair while you have to edit text based configuration files for Privoxy.
Businesses

Submission + - eBay changes feedback system to hurt sellers (ebay.com)

jas67 writes: * Buyers will only be able to receive positive Feedback.
* Positive repeat customer Feedback will count (up to 1 Feedback from the same buyer per week.)
* Feedback more than 12-months old won't count towards your Feedback percentage.
* When a buyer doesn't respond to the Unpaid Item (UPI) process the negative or neutral Feedback they have left for that transaction will be removed.
* When a member is suspended, all their negative and neutral Feedback will be removed.
* Buyers must wait 3 days before leaving negative or neutral Feedback for sellers with an established track record, to encourage communication.
* All Feedback must be left within 60 days (compared to 90 days today) of listing end to encourage timely Feedback and discourage abuse.
* Buyers will be held more accountable when sellers report an unpaid item or commit other policy violations.
Yes, there are lots of bad sellers on ebay trying to rip people off, but Ebay is totally not considering bad buyers (of which there are many). There are just as many ways for a buyer to rip off, or at least waste the time and money or a seller, as there are was for a seller to rip off buyers. Some of you probably remember the case of the fake cashier's check used to pay for a PowerBook G4 (when the PowerBook G4's where new, and >$2000).

Here is a copy of the email that I sent eBay (which will probably fall on deaf ears):

No negative feedback for buyers? What about deadbeats (non-paying bidders). I have been losing a lot of time and money to deadbeat buyers lately.

Also, you're now rewarding deadbeats by removing their negative and neutral feedback when their account gets suspended? How is this an improvement.

Additionally, regarding not being able to leave bad feedback for buyers, is bad for other reasons. On the FAQ for the changes, it says that buyers take the biggest risk. That is entirely untrue. Sellers have just as big a risk, against fraudulent charge-backs — PayPal's "chargeback protection" is worthless. I recently had a buyer hit me with a chargeback, because the laptop that I sold him supposedly had a bad battery — laptop batteries CAN fail without warning. He did not contact me first. I had a brand new battery here that I could have sent him (which only cost me $35). Instead, he forced me through the time-consuming chargeback procedure, which ultimately ended up costing me about $90. And what is to keep a buyer from damaging an item that they receive and then claiming it got to them that way. What about stolen accounts — the risk is once again taken entirely by the seller. And regarding the comment about "retaliatory bad beedback" — it works both ways. A buyer can freely give a seller undeserved bad feedback for no good reason, and the seller doesn't get a chance to answer that. Why bother with buyer feedback at all then?!?!? I'm a buyer and a seller. So are many other people. If someone is a bad buyer, they are probably a bad seller. I don't want to buy from someone who habitually pays late, returns things because they didn't Look at my feedback (well over 99%). eBay has made a lot of money from me. I have lost quite a bit of money over the years to non-paying bidders, and bids from stolen accounts where I could not recover the eBay fees. Now they make it harder for sellers to screen buyers. I have accepted returns from people, even though their complaint was for a flaw in an item that WAS DISCLOSED in the listing. This cost me time (which is money), and actual money in unrecoverable costs (shipping, my time, ebay fees, etc). eBay needs to treat there sellers better too. eBay makes their money FROM THE SELLERS!!!!! Not, directly from the buyers. Without the sellers, there are no buyer. Yes, they should protect buyers from fraudulent sellers, but they should also protect sellers from fraudulent buyers. These policy changes are driving me away from eBay. I am very seriously considering other ways to sell my merchandise, as the cost of doing business on eBay is becoming prohibitive. Please forward this to someone within eBay who makes these policies, and let them know that this is not accepted well by sellers (who are the ones that provide eBay with the money to stay in business).

The Courts

Submission + - Atheists not allowed to adopt children (time.com) 4

gollum123 writes: "From Time, After six years of childless marriage, John and Cynthia Burke of Newark decided to adopt a baby boy through a state agency ( http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,877155,00.html ) . John Burke, an atheist, and his wife, a pantheist, left the line for religious affiliation blank on the forms. Superior Court Judge William Camarata raised the religious issue. Inestimable Privilege. In an extraordinary decision, Judge Camarata denied the Burkes' right to the child because of their lack of belief in a Supreme Being. Despite the Burkes' "high moral and ethical standards," he said, the New Jersey state constitution declares that "no person shall be deprived of the inestimable privilege of worshiping Almighty God in a manner agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience." Despite Eleanor Katherine's tender years, he continued, "the child should have the freedom to worship as she sees fit, and not be influenced by prospective parents who do not believe in a Supreme Being." Two weeks ago, aided by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Burkes appealed directly to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case. If they fail in their appeal, Eleanor Katherine may have to leave the only family she has ever known and await adoption by another couple whose religious convictions satisfy the State of New Jersey."
Cellphones

Submission + - iPhone 1.1.3 Update Confirmed, Breaks Apps, Unlock (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Gizmodo has gathered conclusive evidence which confirms that the iPhone Firmware 1.1.3 update is 100% real. It installs only from iTunes using the obligatory Apple private encryption key, which nobody has. The list of new features, like GPS-like triangulation positioning in Google Maps, has been confirmed too. Apparently it will be coming out next week, but there's bad news as expected: it breaks the unlocks, patches the previous vulnerabilities used by hackers and takes away all your third-party applications.
Linux Business

Submission + - PC Mag slams Everex gPC (pcmag.com)

An anonymous reader writes: PC Magazine reviews the $200 Linux desktop wonder sold by Wal-Mart. This desktop sold out quickly and has been cited as proof that consumers are tired of the Windows tax and ready for Linux. Not so according to PC Magazine giving the gPC a 1.5 star rating. "The gPC is not the alternative to Windows or Mac OS X it's cracked up to be; it's very frustrating to use."
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft Announces New Zune Lineup, Wireless Sync (pcworld.com)

BarlowBrad writes: From PC World: "Microsoft announced a new slate of Wi-Fi-equipped Zune players today, including $150 4GB and $200 8GB flash-based players, and a $250 80GB model that's slimmer than the original Zune. All of the new models feature touch-sensitive controls and wireless syncing with your PC, a much-demanded feature that Microsoft will also make available on the original 30GB Zune when the new models debut in mid November."

Wireless. More space than a Nomad. But draw your own conclusions.

Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft Unveils Multitouch User Interface

longacre writes: Popular Mechanics takes the Microsoft Surface system for a hands-on video test drive. To be announced at today's D5 conference, the coffee-table-esqe device allows manipulation from multiple touch points, while infrared, WiFi and Bluetooth team up to allow wireless transfers between devices placed on top of it, such as cameras and cell phones. Expected to launch before the end of the year in the $5,000-$10,000 range, the devices might not make their way under many Christmas trees, but will find the insides of Starwood hotels, Harrah's casinos and T-Mobile shops.
User Journal

Journal Journal: Do Slashdot Editors Need Remedial English?

In two different front page stories, one on May 23 and one on May 25, the headline proclaimed that one party sued another. In both cases, they were threatening potential lawsuits if their demands were not met, meaning no one was actually suing in either story.
Security

Submission + - www.quantriweb.com

nhhuan writes: "qun tr web, quantriweb, quan tri web, thiet ke web,thiet ke website,dang ky ten mien, cho thue may chu,mang internet,web,vietnam, website,domain,hosting, database,hack,security,template,css,script,open source, www, CNTT Vietnam, VietNam Webmaster News. VietNam Webmaster News. 1st in VietNam Website for Webmasters. (C) 2007 by quantriWEB.com"
Space

Submission + - London's new planetarium opens to the public

shojokid writes: The London Planetarium, owned by Madame Tussauds was "rebranded" last year to The Stardome but at least Londoners now have a new Planetarium @ the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, south-east London as part of the Time and Space Project. It features a Digistar 3 projector system which is said to be one of the more advanced. (list of Digistar Planetariums around the world) And the entrance cost is about the same as the tube fare around London.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - Apple sued - Macbook LCD not "millions" of

qu1j0t3 writes: "Business 2.0 reports, "Two MacBook owners ... have filed a class action lawsuit ... charging the company with deceptive advertising, misrepresentation and unfair competition over the use of the phrase 'millions of colors' to describe the capability of the LCD displays in MacBook and MacBook Pro computers." (Engadget broke the story. I can't comment if these guys have a genuine complaint; I've no plans to upgrade my Powerbook G4.)"
Windows

Submission + - Why Vista + Longhorn = Faster Networking

tomlasusa writes: Networking on Windows has always sucked, especially across LANs. Network Computing details improvements to the TCP stack and networking support in Microsoft Vista and Longhorn, including receive-side-window autotuning and the Compound TCP algorithm, which will increase network performance. Tests showed a Windows Vista computer had twice the throughput downloading a file from a Windows 2003 server, compared with the same download to a Windows XP computer. Longhorn will provide an additional boost. Could Windows networking finally be up to snuff? http://www.networkcomputing.com/channels/storagean dservers/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=199200598

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...