Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Units (Score 1) 986

No that's one megawatt for one hour - which is why it's an incredibly weird thing to use for a month. For the length of a month that's equivalent to 2kW for 720 hours, assuming 30 days, so a LOT less than typically household usage.

Pardon me. The number I first found when I looked up average household usage was way off.

So... average U.S. household is about 10.5 MWH. This thing put out 1.5 MWH in one month (more or less). Multiply by 12 and you get 16 MWH, which is higher than the average in even the state with the highest average, LA, which is 15 MWH.

Still, again, it's anything but tiny. You have to account for the mass of the device. Even more so for the mass of the fuel.

You don't have a shred of evidence that it's a "con". Only guesses. And bad guesses at that. Not good enough.

2 kW is less current then a standard single phase socket puts out. It is ably carried by 1mm or smaller conductors. There was a 3-phase power supply involved in this experiment, connected to something which is functionally a bar heater.

The values for total power out that they computer are only in the 2200 W range - still practically doable by our aformentioned single phase power socket.

So yes, tiny is the correct word.

Comment Re:Hoax (Score 1) 986

No but the inventor who supplied a "power box" which was sitting in front of the 3-phase power to the device, and was on site for the setup and allowed to tamper with the device at various times very well could have.

People who haven't dealt with complex (literally) power systems always chronically underestimate how many ways you can get power into a system which will not be obviously represented as volts and amps via measurement devices.

Comment Re:Hoax (Score 1) 986

Steam engines needed infrastructure, but he also still actually sold them.

It's a device which compounds and bootstraps itself if it's so simple. Just sell the power - it's passive income, apparently, once you do, and keep building more. I mean, it does generate electricity right? Because grid feed in is pretty easy to get setup with, and small towns go into the power generation business all the time. So what's holding him up?

Comment Re:What A Weapon (Score 2) 478

Someone becoming symptomatic with Ebola isn't going to be feeling physically well enough after 1 day to do anything.

They're not going to look well enough to get near anybody. This isn't a disease where you have a cough and runny nose for a long time. This is a disease where after a couple of hours you're bleeding internally and will barely be able to move. The time frame of the Texas patient was he went to the hospital, got sent home and then started vomiting blood before he got in the door.

Which is bad, but again: no one's going to touch it and it can all be removed by spraying everything with bleach.

Comment Re:Disease spread is fractal (Score 1) 478

The aid workers who picked it up despite taking precautions will sure be comforted by your sentiment.

Even in modern hospitals, disease outbreaks happen despite precautions.

Which aid workers? You mean all the nurses in Africa who don't even have basic medical supplies like latex gloves?

People aren't catching it in spite of precautions, they're catching it due to tragic but predictable mistakes which happen when working in close contact with a deadly disease. But they're not then going to go on and spread it to others from that contact.

Comment Re:The monitoring of passengers is a joke (Score 1) 478

If they're contagious when they get off the plane, you're in a buttload of hurt. Now you have to find everyone else who was on the plane and monitor them for symptoms, because some are now infected too.

The only way this can possibly work is to prevent them from boarding the plane.

Are you seriously suggesting that determining if someone may have had Ebola while on a plane is useless because it would be better to do it before they got on the plane? Seriously?

Comment Re:Critics should take positive action (Score 2) 993

The silent majority can man up and do the development work. Or fork Gnome and maintain the changes. But that might involve learning to play nice with others to coordinate such an effort, rather then flaming one developer who by definition can't actually be responsible for distro-uptake of it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...