Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Back to our regularly scheduled conspiracies (Score 1) 144

This sounds more like the usual slashdot front page material. Someone forgot to mention that it also gives him the right to eat your firstborn - regardless of their age - but it is nonetheless much closer to what we usually see here now. It isn't funny, but neither were any of the April Fool's articles.

Comment Re:I sincerely hope she's incorrect (Score 1) 65

But using a tragedy like that in a prophetic mode is tasteless.

It's easy to say that when the person doing it doesn't have much of a chance of becoming your party's next spokesperson (again).

However I recall that your last POTUS used a tragedy (that killed even more people) to justify a terrible mistake that killed over 3,000 Americans and unknown thousands of non-Americans. I have never seen you criticize that use of a tragedy.

As tasteless as the idiotic Indiana protests designed to distract from Her Majesty's email fiasco

Is that your idea of an April Fool's joke? I have never heard anyone reach far enough into absurdity before to try to connect those two events. You have the freedom to hate on people that far and further, but there is absolutely no logical support between those two events. It is preposterous to claim that people angry over a pro-discrimination bill in Indiana would protest there to distract us from the email situation that Hillary is having.

Comment Re:I sincerely hope she's incorrect (Score 1) 65

By tasteless, are you referring to her calling Lubitz "deranged", or something else? Her monologue regarding President Lawnchair isn't much different from much of yours.

And for that matter I just saw some guy on google plus trying to resurrect the birther hysteria over him recently with new "allegations" regarding the Hawaiian birth. I'm surprised you haven't jumped on board that bandwagon yet.

Comment We can do better! (Score 0) 37

We frequently have more profound conspiracy theories on the front page of slashdot than this. This not only isn't interesting but it also doesn't encourage immediate removal of President Obama. I find this disappointing, and I'm sure other slashdot readers do as well (albeit perhaps for different reasons).

Comment Re:mcgrews razor (Score 1) 65

I'm not sure how it is in her self-interest to disconnect others from reality; she doesn't need to recruit believers to continue to attract attention. It seems pretty clear that her presidential goose is cooked anyways, she just needs to keep bringing in enough attention to pull in revenue from the tabloids so she can land the fox news or reality tv gig that she aspires to.

Comment Re:Of course I do! (Score 1) 52

Hey, it's hard work being a time-traveling Martian posing as the leader of the free world. Sometimes I'm bound to let go somewhere, I figured since nobody reads this site anymore it would be as good a place as any. After all, if someone else told you that I, the POTUS, read slashdot, would you believe them? Of course not!

Comment Re:and secure passwords are disallowed (Score 1, Offtopic) 349

Whenever I hear the Republicans whining about how incompetent government is, I think to myself that big private companies are just as bureaucratic and incompetent. But then things like this and the initial ACA website launch happen to prove that yes, government really is even more incompetent than big business.

While this does sound rather incompetent, A) it was probably written by a big private company, since our government uses contractors far more than it uses actual employees for most projects like this*, and B) there are insufficient data points to show that big private companies are any more or less secure, when dealing with similar data. Anecdotally, I'd guess private companies are just as bad or worse, or at least would be without regulations like HIPAA to force them to improve.

* I didn't RTFA and if it states this system was developed wholly by in-house staff I stand corrected. And also we should probably raise taxes so we can afford to hire competent in-house staff for our government.

Comment Re:Sign up? (Score 1) 349

Exactly. I've posted this before, but it's worth hammering in until more people understand it.

What used to be called fraud, perpetuated against a business by tricking them into selling something on false pretenses, has instead become "identity theft", perpetuated against an innocent third-party who has nothing to do with the transaction. It's so so very clever how the business community managed to turn that around and put the fault (until proven otherwise) and responsibility to clean up the mess on a third party, instead of on themselves and/or the actual crooks.

Slashdot Top Deals

Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!

Working...