Comment Re:Windows !!! (Score 1) 93
Sorry it's shift right-click in Windows 7.
Sorry it's shift right-click in Windows 7.
The one where you Right click the application and it's like the 3rd option in the context menu?
It's impossible? So when I right click and choose "Run as different user" do I have some magical version of Windows?
Right click->Run as different user. Yeah, real difficult.
Then simply state the year. I agree with GP and the others, adding in the iPhone is just for clickbaiting.
You think Hollywood invented it? Are you horribly naive?
And before someone comes along telling me how it's all the fault of local governments that we have these monopolies, that's simply not true. The reason these local monopolies exist, is that for decades the cable operators required these exclusivity agreements from the local governments as a condition of even serving their municipal area. It was not that the local governments decided to force these monopolies upon the cable companies against their will.
They could have already been bringing their "great" products to new cities without this merger. Though, that would have required *gasp* competing with other companies rather than carving out local monopolies to prevent having to compete with each other.
Slashdot is been posting general new stories since basically forever.
It is to anyone with even a half-working brain.
No, he was clearly saying any person who downloaded the app based on her cancer story is a nutjob. He is saying that for any non-nutjob finding for sure she was lying is like finding out for sure that water is wet.
I don't agree with the OP, as I think people can be naive without being a nutjob.
I was probably being a bit harsh calling them all nutjobs, but yes, there was more to my sentence beyond the "everyone" part that eldavjohn didn't seem to read past.
Yes, I do. It's why we have idiotic parents who aren't giving their kids vaccinations so now we have kids dying again of measles, whooping cough, etc. Diseases that a few decades ago were all but eradicated.
So you're saying everyone knew she was lying about her charity donations as well [theage.com.au]? Or was it only the charities that knew that? From the article:
Everyone? No. But anyone who wasn't some doe-eyed true believer? Yes and Yes.
So you're saying the 300,000 downloads are by people that knew they were downloading the app architected by a liar? And they were paying $3.79 to Apple and this liar for a recipe app that contain recipes that someone lied about helping her cure cancer?
Of course not. They are those psuedo-science nutjobs that I referred to. The same idiots who by crap from Kevin Trudeau, etc. Did you even bother to read everything I wrote or did you just read up to the "everyone" part of the sentence and then start foaming at the mouth?
Wait. A person who made dubious claims that had no scientific backing to them was actually lying? What next? Water is wet?!!
I think pretty much everyone but the nutjob, true believers in psuedo-science knew all along that this woman was lying.
The faces give it away no matter what you watch it on.
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.