So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

So why is it that administrators will allow each other free reign to abuse unpriveleged users (especially homeless ones), but they go into a mod-bombing rage when the unpriveleged user dares to shoot back?

Usually it seems like Slashdot has a system in place to prevent the same person from posting too many AC posts in a row. I know that, in years past, even on accounts with excellent karma, anything after the second AC post was usually met with time limits in excess of sixty minutes and anything after a third AC post was, well, forget it. Just use an account.

So I have to wonder. What is it in some people's make up which causes them to have a need, a real psychological dependence, on stalking another human being? It's truly a predator/prey type relationship.

Some people have really thin skin and are so easily incensed that they will never give up, will never stop, must repeatedly keep tracking down their target--but always make sure that they never do so in a way which will bring any of their actions back on them.

Gosh. If the world didn't have cowards to track me down then it might have to face reality that I'm right.

Wow. In this post I begin with a somewhat controversial statement and the readers are so filled with spite and rage that it gets modded through the floor.

I'm sorry, folks, did they not read anything after the first line? One little misstep and suddenly nothing else I say could possibly have any merit? What's the definition of a zero tolerance policy?