Not only that, I don't see it demonstrated anywhere that the gov't will do society any more favors with additional funds than any random wealthy bastard already does. I hate rich people as much as the next prole, but I'm self-aware enough to be thankful for a good job given to me by a set of wealthy private citizens who happen to own a multi-national corporation that needs a few 100 databases taken care of. The last thing I want is some gov't initiative (that probably won't accomplish anything) putting the screws to wealthy people who actually (begrudgingly, not generously) provide decent jobs. If someone were to shoot the current fiscal monstrosity masquerading as gov't with a few silver bullets then maybe I'd consider what good Washington might accidentally do. We should be getting a lot more for what guv already spends, and they label you insane if you even mention balancing the budget. That crew does not qualify for additional tax receipts.

I read the title as: Sauron Is "Infinitely" Weaker As a Result of Destruction of the One Ring

A sysadmin manipulating access privs hardly seems brilliant. Now if he'd leveraged some software exploits shortly before implementing patches that address said exploits, that would indicate a much greater knowledge of the systems he was looting - a certain grace or panache, if you will. I guess this "brilliant" quote is what you get when people who see these systems as a black box are doing the talking. I'm thinking reality resembles less Snowden brilliance and more NSA caught with their pants down.

Assange's narcissism facilitated this - the kid got put to work after the Wikileaks schism, and there surely was not enough manpower to properly vet the new guys. Longest lasting fallout is probably talent that would otherwise have gotten involved now have to wonder whether they are talking to just Wikileaks, or Wikileaks and the FBI/NSA/CIA.

And with widespread hacking comes additional regulation, the eventual future involves getting sidelined into the slow lane while the rich and connected glide by as if you are standing still.

You are wildly inaccurate. I supplied no metric, just a comparison of your reckless conjecture with a source you yourself supplied. If you have a problem with your own source's statement just admit you don't like your source. And people who wait until after elementary school to address reproduction issues on their own terms are not denying their children an education. So... thanks anyway.

That response stat is lumped in as a "religious and moral" education concern, and is *a* reason to homeschool, not *the* reason to homeschool (i.e. one of multiple reasons a given respondant gave). I think people who ticked that box because they didn't want their kids getting sex ed in elementary school are getting counted as religious nuts by you. Either way, later on that site indicates "homeschoolers generally fare quite well in college", which does not sound like "children being denied the ability to even operate in society".

the hyphens comment our the rest of the (original) INSERT command, so that the truncated INSERT and the DROP TABLE commands get executed instead of erroring out due to syntax.

Disagree due to perceived inaccuracy of your terms "generally" and "most of these people". There's been a lot of homeschooling activity in the US during the past decade, and of the many homeschoolers I know not one of the families even goes to church more than 5 or 6 times per year. The concerns I hear have all been related to quality of education. I'm going to guess a few crazy, in-bred homeschoolers get more attention than a quiet, well-adjusted home-school family - they certainly have your attention. Of course this is anecdotal - if you could post some statistics that support your assertions I am open to that.

Similarly, an election does not show the electorate's ability to think rationally, but rather who's political campaign staff is more efficient. I propose some kind of critical thinking requirement in the public education curriculum.

Iran doesn't need a missile or stealth bomber to deliver a warhead - a freighter hold or terrorist cell could also work. I don't say that because i think they'll do it (nor would i say they won't do it) but looking at the most expensive options and rejecting those doesn't do the analysis any good. And asking whether a country will use nukes is of temporary usefulness. This is the culture that fielded the children's martyr brigade against Iraq's well-supplied machine gun nests. After allowing the nuclear genie out of the bottle who can say what the next 40 years will bring?

I just focus better in my tiny, half-walled cell at the office. There are a lot of people parading to my office for help with various issues and it's a fine thing for my boss to see that, too. I get lots of chances to work at home, sometimes without the kids, but there are many distractions. Who wants to tune a query or troubleshoot PL/SQL when there's an XBox sitting 10 feet away?

Laundered money for the Nazis. Probably still some gold Jewish teeth rattling in a few bank vaults over there.

Let's go with "Who stole their land from the native Maoris, Alex."

I was a rater for 1 year some time ago. My impression was the rating was against results from updates they were considering for the production algorithm. Testing at the QA level. I found it boring and soulless, but a wide knowledge of obscure, otherwise-useless facts really facilitated the work. Sometimes a little-known double meaning for a concept would cause disagreements among raters, and once a moderator hated my opinion so much he had my home phone called several times to demand I change my rating.