Comment Re:You no longer own a car (Score 3, Informative) 649
Since I'm not buying it I shouldn't be taxed on it
Nope. Legally you own it. The summary is pretty clear the automakers are abusing copyright, remember?
Since I'm not buying it I shouldn't be taxed on it
Nope. Legally you own it. The summary is pretty clear the automakers are abusing copyright, remember?
Nothing a nice, expensive official repair shop won't fix.
Godawful editing on Slashdot? Say it ain't so.
It isn't developing at all anymore. They are only adding mass, Watts, heat and fans.
AMD's shift away from VLIW toward SIMT doesn't count, then?
The architectures are still evolving. They're not just throwing more transistors at the same old ideas.
do I then have an obligation to change my buying patterns
No.
I've used AdBlock too on occasion, but there is a point to be made that 'overuse' of it would be bad for the web.
I don't recall the Fourth Amendment mentioning an exception for unless you really want to.
I imagine 'quality' can be parameterised, in a sense. If you have a very conservative turret, it would only shoot when it's damn sure it ought to, even if that means letting friendly soldiers get shot down because it's so cautious.
Ah, right you are
Google also turned up the Super aEgis II, but there doesn't seem to be much out there on it - I'm not sure quite how automated it really is.
We're not going to have a weapon that can do both of those for a long time.
Sure it is. A landmine malfunction can't take out a village, and it's not actively selecting targets.
You're seriously saying that there's nothing to discuss here, then? Seriously?
Heh, you think fully autonomous weapons are going to come before the end of war?
I don't care about 'fully'. In the short term, I care about the technology that's already at our fingertips: a robot with a machine-gun that is able to assess a situation and then 'decide' (without human intervention) to shoot the people it deems to be the enemy.
Do you count landmines as fully autonomous?
Interesting example. In a sense, yes, I guess so. The problems with landmines arise precisely because they make poor 'decisions' to kill people, no?
Apparently the Supreme Court decided that that would be unconstitutional, but it's Just Too Important(TM) so it's fine.
+5 Insightful, really?
Assuming war isn't going to disappear overnight, this is a conversation that has to happen.
If Amazon cares (and they appear to), shouldn't there be a route to reporting this stuff? Sending them a photo, or something?
You somehow think your little rant is relevant?
Reminder: the existence of misandry doesn't disprove or render irrelevant misogyny.
"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai
