How about, before posting, you scan your headlines/summaries for words like 'could', 'might, 'possibly', 'maybe', 'probably', and ask yourself whether you're posting news about stuff that matters or just speculations with some trigger keywords.

So, your life savings are under a mattress? Or do you trust the bank?

Right, the usual fundme bullshit wrapped as article. Come back when you have something beyond speculation.

We will adapt traffic rules and situations, the layout of the network to make it more suitable for automated driving.

Assembly is art in programming like chiseling in stone is in writing books.

Severely punishing criminals does the same too. We will not be held hostage by the unwilling.

A) Why would I want transparency in an animation?
B) Then 'some browsers' need to fix their gif handling.
C) Typical gif size is what, 1MB?
D) Burden of proof is on APNG.

Browsing through this page, I've seen what the current gif implementations allow. APNG has no business fragmenting the animated image playing field. And guess what, my music collection is still mp3.

This is a global market. Companies want to make money. Apparently 'completely unqualified' H1B workers are worth their money. Perhaps American IT workers are simply hugely overpaid.

True, with conventional design the gain is questonable. But at least this would open up a new branch in chip design, and it would be interesting to see what comes out of it.

Only thing missing from the title to completely disqualify the article is ', scientists say.' No, I didn't bother even reading the summary.

UK's citizen becoming experts on web technology, encryption and obfuscation in 3... 2... 1... I mean, take a man's porn away and he'll build a rocket to Mars to get it.

Translation: you're not getting the point. Lots of false negatives and false positives is still a lot better than random guessing. Also, this is just the beginning.

The reason Microsoft is still the favored desktop OS is probably linux taking forever to get its shit together and create a user-focused OS like Ubuntu, giving Microsoft all the time it needed to create Windows 7. I remember well the many attempts I made with earlier linuxes, only to be disappointed each and every time because shit just didn't work. Ubuntu is a breeze these days, sure, but that's too little, too late. Linux has always, and still does to a large extent, lacked discoverability of features and solutions. I can still hardly imagine configuring a linux machine without access to internet forums answering very specific questions.

Yes, this type of comment always goes down well with the Slashdot crowd. Nevertheless, it is time you move away from your Win98 machine and enter the real world.