If the school administrators have a backbone and are willing to stand up to the RIAA, there may be some weak spots in this law. (I haven't read the whole law, just the excerpt here.) Define "reasonably" in the sentence "[R]easonably attempt to prevent the infringement of copyrighted works over the institution's computer and network resources" and it seems to be rather vague. It seems that there are no standards are set forth as to what is reasonble. The other weak point is here: "if such institution receives fifty (50) or more legally valid notices of infringement as prescribed by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 within the preceding year" What constitutes "legally valid" notices of copyright infringement? Some courts are now alleging that the RIAA can't file suit against students unless they first have proof (not just allegations) that the individual(s) did indeed infringe on copyright(s). That would mean that they don't have a "legally valid" complaint, would it not? I'm not a lawyer, but it seems that if the law is rather vague about this, it will be tested very soon in the courts.