Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:But not to Nestle. (Score 1) 332

If you're going to calculate it like that, then contribution of farmers to GDP is much higher too, so fix your numbers.

No. Farmers sell their produce to "city dwellers". Once sold, produce (food) belongs to the city dwellers and their eating it and producing wealth doesn't contribute to farmers' contribution to GDP at all.

Farmers are free to raise the price of their produce and hence increase their contribution to GDP.

Comment Re:You don't need email, either (Score 1) 394

A ringing phone can be ignored, silenced, numbers blacklisted. An employee who chose to not do any of these can reply to a text message/email as well. So no, this lack of confirmation is not the problem with text/email. Problem is expressiveness - human beings are mostly much more expressive in the spoken word rather than quickly written text, especially in rare complex emergencies. Human employees are typically paid for on-call access to mainly troubleshoot rare complex emergencies.

In any case, text message and emails are convenient to schedule a quick ad-hoc voice call on phone. So voice and text are not only not mutually exclusive but highly complementary.

Comment Re:people are going to be saying (Score 1) 737

so this copilot is a complete scumbag

You do not know enough to conclude this.

How often do suicidal bus drivers drive off a cliff? Suicidal operators of huge industrial machines take down their workplace? Pretty rare, even if there are hundreds of times as many bus drivers / heavy machine operators as compared to airline pilots.

Many countries have zero effective regulation on bus driver / machine operators sleep cycles. Lots of drivers / operators work without any social interaction which could have helped detect and even prevent suicidal tendencies. This pilot was at least working along with another human being. Was in Europe - which at least on paper had good sleep cycle regulations, and knowing Europe, regulations would have had some force of effect too.

There could have been other reasons for this event. Your ignorance of them do not make those reasons stop existing.

Comment Re:It depends (Score 2) 486

But except saying it "dramatically" improves results, the StringBuilder result wasn't worthy of a mention or a compare against disk performance.

Obviously, like any good "researcher" does, the conclusion was written first and then the "experiment" was performed. Any results contradicting the conclusion have to excluded.

Comment Re:It depends (Score 1) 486

The above explanation applies to any data structure that has to be stored contiguously and increases in size, or is immutable

But it was never necessary for the "in memory operation" (their words) to use an immutable data structure. If you use bad data structure when using in-memory, of course in-memory will be slower than disk.

Comment java string concatenation is O(N) (Score 1) 486

This "researcher" is an idiot. The java code given at the bottom of the "research paper" uses + operator to concatenate strings. This is O(N) in Oracle java. Total algorithm becomes O(N*N) in memory, and O(N) on disk.

Obviously N*N takes longer than N after a certain N even when N*N is running on faster memory.

Slashdot Top Deals

No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.

Working...