What are the chances that the secure boot is a simple switch that we can change? Enable secure boot to support whatever keys are in the system or disable to support anything else? I would actually be surprised if UEFI didn't support this.

I didn't know you could drag the favicon to the desktop to create a shortcut to the page. huh, learn something every day.

On the other side, how come copy in OSX doesn't merge with any folders that already exist in the destination. The default action is to delete everything that exists and then copy the folders over.

Yes. Then maybe we can keep our nose out of everyone elses business and focus on just this country. There is no need for our military to be this big. We should go back to being a neutral country and be happy with it.

Wouldn't being pro-child-porn be using child porn for your benefits?

Grammar and spelling are not my strong points. Math and science are. I went to college for a computer major, not an English major, so ehh.

Today's kids have grown up with the net. It is so in-graved into today's society for most that most kids don't even think about it. The net is nothing special now like it was years ago. I remember years ago when the net first came around to everyone. It was something special and new then. I used to spend hours just looking around and finding new and different things. Now I mainly go to the few websites I like. It went from a new fascinating thing to simply a tool to get the job done. The magic is gone from the net now that it is everywhere and used by almost everyone. Just comes with the times.

4 spaces
2 spaces doesn't offset the code enough for me to see it well
8 spaces uses up too much real estate
so 4 spaces it is

Hitachi actually has this. You can create a large thin provisioned volume on a dynamic pool and Hitachi can grow and shrink it as needed. It's true that the OS will only see the large volume but it's a start in the right direction to reclaim extra space when it's not used.
Also, we just purchased a 50TB Hitachi SAN with Fibrechannel and iSCSI for only $110,000. Enterprise can be had for less but that is educational cost also.

Exactly. That's how red light cameras where found to be unconstitutional in Missouri and now all cameras have been deactivated. :)

And people wonder why open source is sometimes looked at like a little kid trying to play in a big world. I like open source and I try to push it as much as I can, it's people like this that makes it look bad.

Businesses already know that most data is stored once and never looked at again. The simple solution would be to offer multiple locations to store data, one for frequently accessed data and one for archival, etc. The problem comes down to is training. There are a lot of people that can barely use a computer and the whole concept of the multiple folders would confuse them. Another solution is to solve the issue with software. There are several archival solutions that will look at the file accessed date and either move it to cheaper disk or even tape. It leaves a stub file in place in the original location and if a user tries to access the file, it will pop up a box saying "please wait while the file is restored". This solution is nice in where the users don't have to change how they save data but it is harder to manage. You have your data spread across multiple systems instead of one and backups could become harder. Overall, it just depends on which direction you want to go with your data and what makes the most sense.

And that is usually done through tests

Are we saying FAT32 is not so FAT after all?

but but but...The Internet is for porn, or at least that's what the song said