Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Debian

FreeNAS Switching From FreeBSD To Debian Linux 206

dnaumov writes "FreeNAS, a popular, free NAS solution, is moving away from using FreeBSD as its underlying core OS and switching to Debian Linux. Version 0.8 of FreeNAS as well as all further releases are going to be based on Linux, while the FreeBSD-based 0.7 branch of FreeNAS is going into maintenance-only mode, according to main developer Volker Theile. A discussion about the switch, including comments from the developers, can be found on the FreeNAS SourceForge discussion forum. Some users applaud the change, which promises improved hardware compatibility, while others voice concerns regarding the future of their existing setups and lack of ZFS support in Linux."

Comment Re:He deserves it (Score 1) 541

Linus does rate high recognition, but it should be a better award than the "Peace" prize. Considering some of the previous winners -- Yassar Arafat, Barak "No Accomplishments" Obama and Al "No Controlling Legal Authority" Gore -- Linus deserves a better award than one given by extreme-left Norwegian politicians.

Comment Peak Oil: neo-Malthusian thinking (Score 1) 720

As it has happened in the past, someone is plotting a rising demand curve against a presumed insufficient supply, and screams "we're doomed!". This kind of thinking ignores new oil finds, and new recovery techniques which extract more oil from existing finds.

Also ignored are two known Saudi Arabia-sized oil sources -- the tar sands of Alberta and oil shale in the US. At current prices, using these sources isn't economically feasible, but if the price of oil moves up and stays up, we'll see these sources come on line.

Can you name one thing the world has run out of? New technologies, close substitution, and ingenuity driven by economic need have always bolstered and increased the supply of a needed commodity.

Comment not so impressive (Score 1) 260

Remember that this 1.1TF is single-precision; double-precision is around 240GF. Let's hope they fix this in the next version.

Also, there is 240 cores per C1060, for 720 cores total of Tesla power. The additional 240 cores come from the Quadro in the system; those cores may occasionally be busy with graphics work and unavailable for computation.

Comment Re:I will laugh when ATT's network collapses (Score 1) 501

Doesn't make it any safer, the problem is the conversation with someone you can't see.

A grand, unfounded assertion. When flying a small aircraft under Instrument Flight Rules, I routinely speak with someone I can't see (the controller), listen to other conversations to visualize the traffic around me; and at the same time fly on course, on speed, and on altitude; and navigate and anticipate what coming down the road.

Communication with "someone you can't see" can be done, and done well -- even in the face of high traffic, turbulence, and a difficult approach. Compared to hard IFR flying, driving is a joke. Those who can't drive and talk at the same time probably shouldn't have a license.

Comment Re:I'll believe it when I see it... (Score 1) 219

Opera is made by a Norwegian company and Norway is not an EU member (and unlikely to become one either, since in the previous referendum on the issue, Norwegians voted quite clearly against membership).

True enough, and I apologize -- I was mislead by this release from the Free Software Foundation Europe that called Opera "a European Company" (http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/press-release/2009q1/000231.html).

Oh, and as far as Airbus vs. Boeing is concerned, I'd like to present you with an example of American protectionism: The FAA required Airbus to install thrust reversers on the A380 citing safety reasons even though the FAA also requires aircraft to be able to under all circumstances have the same runway length requirements without thrust reversers since thrust reversers are so unreliable. The only real reason for having thrust reversers in the first place has been that it has let pilots reduce brake wear and tear and despite the costs incurred with thrust reversers, the savings in brake maintenance made the total lower. However, with the original A380 design, Airbus reached the lowest maintenance and operating costs by having more powerful brakes and no thrust reversers but then the FAA decided to negate that advantage.

Um, no. According to several postings on airliners.net, several companies have thrust reversers on their Minimum Equipment List for icy runways (e.g. Fedex and UPS going through Anchorage, Alaska, both possible customers for the A380F). Additionally, it seems that the JAA (the European equivalent of the FAA) had the same concerns.

Comment Re:I'll believe it when I see it... (Score 0, Troll) 219

Opera (a purveyor of second-tier browsers) managed to get what it couldn't earn in the market.

I think you may be being a bit deliberately thick here. That's the whole point of the EU ruling. Opera complained that it couldn't get a toe hold in the market because with Microsoft's overwhelming dominance, there wasn't a level playing field.

Firefox's ~30% market share shows that there is a competitive market in browsers. Opera's miniscule 2% share shows it is Opera (or, more correctly, Opera's management) that can't compete, but it sure can get politicians to interfere for its own purposes.

The EU has played this game in the past, favoring EU companies by penalizing US companies

Your attempt to provoke nationalist sentiments to rally Americans against the EU and their ruling against Microsoft is very transparent, and has been attempted on several other occasions here on Slashdot. It won't work. In the case of Microsoft, these actions, rather than being thinly-veiled protectionism, are an essential attempt to balance a market that has been in a stranglehold by the dominate player Microsoft for over a decade. The other complaints you have about the EU are irrelevant to this discussion.

Irrelevant? Each instance I quoted had an EU company that benefited from the obstruction of the EU Government and the penalties imposed on the US company. This is classic rent-seeking by EU companies.

Perhaps you believe that politicians are altruistic saints, making judgments worthy of Solomon. I'm not that naive.

Comment Re:I'll believe it when I see it... (Score 1) 219

It is, first and foremost, a political body,

No, it is not. It is an administrative body.

Really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner_for_Competition states that the Commissioner is appointed by the EU Parliament. Politicians tend to make sure that their appointees share their views, which makes it a rather political position.

A change in government will not affect the EU antitrust commission.

Until, of course, the next EU Parliament is seated.

EU forced Microsoft to distribute browsers built by their competitors, regardless of merit or customer desire.

Cry me a river. Look, MS started the game, by forcing its users to accept their own browser, regardless of merit or customer desire.

Forced? Did Microsoft "force" their TCP/IP stack on customers? Does Microsoft preclude other browsers from being installed? The 30% of the market held by Firefox shows that there is good competition in the browser market, and further demonstrates that Opera, with its minuscule percentage of the market, sucks badly on the desktop.

I'm no fan of Microsoft (100% Mac and iPhone at home), but is it really harmful for MS to add features to the O/S (e.g., browsers, IP stacks, mouse drivers) over time?

Amazon (free shipping declared illegal at the behest of French bookstores)

Check your facts. Was this really the EU? Because I just put a few orders on Amazon, and not all for books, and they all included free shipping. And Germany is certainly part of the EU.

My bad -- this was the French government, not the EU.

And, of course, the EU has no problems with huge Airbus subsidies, now declared illegal by the WTO. I hope that the US Government will find its gonads and slap EADS with huge tariffs and penalties. Then, maybe, the EU will be a little less eager to meddle with US companies.

Yeah, because nothing like that has ever happened the other way around. Please.

Really. Name one merger of EU companies that has been blocked by the US Department of Justice. Name one time that the US Government loaned billions to Boeing to build a new passenger aircraft that didn't have to be repaid if the aircraft wasn't successful.

Comment Re:I'll believe it when I see it... (Score 0, Troll) 219

The EU antitrust body is a beast, but I'd hesitate to put it on a white horse. It is, first and foremost, a political body, and as such responds to EU companies that seek rents for their advantage. In the browser case, Opera (a purveyor of second-tier browsers) managed to get what it couldn't earn in the market. In essence, the EU forced Microsoft to distribute browsers built by their competitors, regardless of merit or customer desire.

The EU has played this game in the past, favoring EU companies by penalizing US companies -- Boeing (during the merger with McDonnell Douglas, favoring Airbus), GE/Honeywell (merger blocked), and Amazon (free shipping declared illegal at the behest of French bookstores) are just a few. These actions are nothing more than thinly-veiled protectionism.

And, of course, the EU has no problems with huge Airbus subsidies, now declared illegal by the WTO. I hope that the US Government will find its gonads and slap EADS with huge tariffs and penalties. Then, maybe, the EU will be a little less eager to meddle with US companies.

I won't hold my breath.

Comment Re:Why is it better than a Tesla? (Score 1) 303

This isn't the old SGI anymore, it's Rackable.

Well, SGI's business didn't get magically better just because they were acquired for a song. Rackable really doesn't understand HPC, so I think it will be a difficult integration. I'd further expect some gyrations on their future direction, as Rackable management figures out how to play the game. In any case, we're all in interesting times.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...