Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hope it works... (Score 1) 12

I'd like to see this succeed too but I'm not counting on it. For starters, it's going to be really difficult to make the blocks with the connectors to connect to other blocks and everything and that the result is not an ugly, bulky phone. Make no mistake, looks are important in the smartphone market. In addition, don't count either on having a microSD holder module: Motorola is now part of Google and the big G is pushing hard for the cloud and against microSD cards. To sum up, an interesting idea that I'd like to see realized but I'm not optimistic about it.

Comment Re:Apple made the same mistake (Score 1) 390

Well, the original Galaxy Ace is a pretty bad phone. Samsung cut too many corners in that one. The original premise still stands, though. No, the 150€ (we're talking off-contract prices) Android phone is not as good as an iPhone, but 300-400€ Android phones are.
What's more, the 200€ -current, 2013- Android phones are not as powerful as the latest iPhone but can really do the same things albeit a little slower.
Medicine

Why Johnny Can't Speak: a Cost of Paywalled Research 189

theodp writes "That there's no easy way for her to get timely, affordable access to taxpayer-funded research that could help her patients leaves speech-language pathologist Cortney Grove, well, speechless. 'Cortney's frustration,' writes the EFF's Adi Kamdar, 'is not uncommon. Much of the research that guides health-related progress is funded by taxpayer dollars through government grants, and yet those who need this information most-practitioners and their patients-cannot afford to access it.' She says, 'In my field we are charged with using scientific evidence to make clinical decisions. Unfortunately, the most pertinent evidence is locked up in the world of academic publishing and I cannot access it without paying upwards of $40 an article. My current research project is not centered around one article, but rather a body of work on a given topic. Accessing all the articles I would like to read will cost me nearly a thousand dollars. So, the sad state of affairs is that I may have to wait 7-10 years for someone to read the information, integrate it with their clinical opinions (biases, agendas, and financial motivations) and publish it in a format I can buy on Amazon. By then, how will my clinical knowledge and skills have changed? How will my clients be served in the meantime? What would I do with the first-hand information that I will not be able to do with the processed, commercialized product that emerges from it in a decade?'"
United Kingdom

UK MPs: Google Blocks Child Abuse Images, It Should Block Piracy Too 348

nk497 writes "If Google can block child abuse images, it can also block piracy sites, according to a report from MPs, who said they were 'unimpressed' by Google's 'derisorily ineffective' efforts to battle online piracy, according to a Commons Select Committee report looking into protecting creative industries. John Whittingdale MP, the chair of the Committee — and also a non-executive director at Audio Network, an online music catalogue — noted that Google manages to remove other illegal content. 'Google and others already work with international law enforcement to block for example child porn from search results and it has provided no coherent, responsible reason why it can't do the same for illegal, pirated content,' he said."

Comment Re:The most valuable part of some sites (Score 2) 276

Of course there's a lot of horrible comments, but that's a given on any site and there's not much you can do about it. In addition, moderation is no silver bullet and can both easily miss good comments and bury good ones because they don't coincide with the majority opinion. My point still stands: There're some great comments and opinions here.

Comment The most valuable part of some sites (Score 5, Insightful) 276

It's obvious that comments are what make some websites attractive. This is one of them.
In Slashdot I usually find very interesting what other people think about the news. Sometimes, there're some jewels: Comments about people who really know what the news is about and offer their perspective. I same those comments as bookmarks. I wonder why there's not a "favorite" option to save them.

Comment Re:synergy (Score 1) 180

It actually makes a lot of sense to share the underlying code, more so now that the mobile phones and consoles have a lot of power.
But, I don't think it makes sense in the UI department: Please MS, for the love of the flying spaghetti monster, give each of the devices an appopiate interface for its use cases. You like copying Apple, don't you? They didn't put the iOS UI on OS X. Copy them on that!

Comment Re:Netbeans! (Score 1) 543

+1 I guess the popularity thing is due to Eclipse having much better commercial support. I mean, it has official plugins (developed or sanctioned by the maker of the technology in question) for almost every framework you can think of whereas Netbeans has much fewer official plugins.
Anyway, I like Netbeans much better than Eclipse. It has fewer options and that might make it less flexible but seems to be more focused on getting things working fast and with little effort. It's much more intuitive (IMHO) than Eclipse. In Eclipse everything seems to require lots of configuration.
Interestingly, on the Gnome/KDE dichotomy, I stand on KDE's side which is more complex and configurable (i.e. more similar to Eclipse).

Slashdot Top Deals

1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.

Working...