When does "strong transparency" turn into treason, obstructing justice, or invasion of privacy?
That would depend on (1) the primary source of the information and (2) who publishes it. I don't think most 'patriotic' Chinese citizens would consider publishing the U.S. defence plans for Taiwan 'treason'. When it comes to classified material related to national security, the primary source is in most circumstances committing an illegal act. If it's treason... Well that probably depends on what is uncovered - if it shows that a government is breaking national laws it can be argued that NOT trying to make it known would amount to 'treason'.
Making an, relatively speaking, ancient design for an atomic bomb public is hardly something worth getting upset about, especially since any modern (and reasonably skilled) nuclear physicist could make a far better job.
The full post is here."While in the hospital a short time ago (urgent abdominal surgery), I had a lot of time to meditate and imagine without the pressures of day-to-day business intruding. And I figured out how to do it. The system is harvester-proof. No doubt. The email address can not even be harvested by manually clicking on the link. The system never discloses the real destination email address to any party, robot or human...
Click this link to try it: http://flow-to.com/email/w.u1171228517w.mth
The link can be on web pages, in emails, used in news groups, even published off-line in newspapers or on highway billboards, just like any other URL.
When the link is clicked, two things happen:
(i) your email program opens a new email form or window with the "To" and possibly other fields pre-filled, and
(ii) your browser opens a web page. Depending on your browser, the web page will be blank or it will contain normal web page content.
An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.