No, 1000% per year compounded over 3 years would be an increase of 1000 (1000% is 10 times, year 0 = 1, year 1 = 10*1 = 10, year 2 = 10 times year 1 = 100, year 3 = 10 times year 2 = 1000);
For a 30x growth in 3 years that would be an annual growth of 310%.
To calculate a yearly increase of some initial amount A at a rate of r, you would use A(1+r)
You don't just multiply the rate of increase by the initial value to get the value at the next iteration. A 100% yearly growth rate implies doubling each year, whereas in your calculation a 100% growth rate implies a static state
.
Somebody forgot about compounded growth.
1000% growth over three years (compounded annually) would have them grown a thousandfold over three years. Compounded continuously would be ridiculously large.
If you assume continuous growth, the actual growth rate would be ln(30)/3, or about 113%. If you just want a number to quote as the annual growth rate that would give a thirtyfold increase over three years, go with 211% since (1+2.11)^3 is about 30.
Immaculate conception is not the same concept as virgin birth. If the original sin of Adam and Eve have tainted all births since Genesis, consider what the serpent's offspring have had to deal with.
To the religious minded it may be even more inconceivable that a snake be born without sin than without a father.
There are other methods to increase the alcohol content besides distillation. Freezing, for example, works very similar to distillation since alcohol freezes at a lower temperature than water. Get a freezer between these two temperatures and then remove the ice. The finished product is still considered beer.
all of our foodstock has been randomly and chaotically modified over thousands of years
Make that millions of years. There's another name for random and chaotic modification of genetic code until something is found that works. It's called natural selection. Agriculture takes a bit of the nature out of this natural selection, but selective breeding keeps one important thing in place that is missing in GM crops: biodiversity.
Biodiversity protects a species against diseases and against pests. If every wheat plant in an area has the same genetic code they are all vulnerable to the exact same pathogens to the exact same degree, so instead of a bug wiping out 80-90% of a field of wheat and leaving the remaining plants resistant to that disease and stronger, you now have lost 100% of the plants and will have to start over with a new GM strain that is similarly vulnerable.
Rather than post completely uninformed comments on the subject, leave that to people in the field.
You must be new here
A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth