All of the fossil fuels run on science. There is geology and chemistry and pollution control and how to make oil flow in a pipeline. If you school won't invest in fossil fuels, there is a chance you won't consider working for them either. The engineering and science may not get done as quickly and the industry may slow as a result of moral objections.

Well #6 says "This argument would have merit if there was much evidence to support it. When, for example, the Guardian asked the Wellcome Trust to give instances where engagement had produced change, it could not. And as campaigner Bill McKibben has pointed out, engagement is unlikely to persuade a company to commit to eventually putting itself out of business. In fact some market regulators, such as in the US, do not allow this kind of engagement. "

New York is pretty comparable with Spain. TFA did look at other locations.

"There have been a handful of successful divestment campaigns in recent history, including those targeting violence in Darfur, tobacco advertising, and others, but the largest and most impactful one came to a head around the issue of South African Apartheid. By the mid-1980s, 155 campuses – including some of the most famous in the country – had divested from companies doing business in South Africa. 26 state governments, 22 counties, and 90 cities, including some of the nation’s biggest, took their money from multinationals that did business in the country. The South African divestment campaign helped break the back of the Apartheid government and usher in an era of democracy and equality." http://gofossilfree.org/what-i...

10 myths about fossil fuel divestment are put to the sword here: http://www.theguardian.com/env... Yours is #5. "To sell a stock you have to have a buyer. But the amounts being divested are too small to flood the market and cut share prices, so they won’t be going cheap. Also, the buyers of the stock are taking on the risk that the fossil fuel stocks may tank in the future, if the world’s nations fulfil their pledge to keep global warming below 2C by sharply cutting carbon emissions. If these stocks are risky, then the public and value-based institutions primarily targeted by the divestment movement should not be holding them. The argument that owning a stock gives you influence over a company leads us neatly into the next divestment myth."

Shouldn't it be an encouragement to get to work on carbon capture and sequestration to get off the sh*t l*st?

You seem to have made a mistake about solar energy payback times, which are about a year. http://cleantechnica.com/2013/...

After a bit of work I did get the thesis and it aims to supply world electricity demand 20,200 TWh/yr from the Sahara.

The thesis file seems to come up damaged. This image seems to suggest though that the number may have been miscalculated in the article. http://www.linda-goodman.com/u...

You might be asking is there such a thing as guilt? The basic answer is yes. So, a punishment must seem to be deserved to the one who is punished if a conscience is present. Otherwise, it cannot be a background for mercy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...

Imprisonment to death seems to work for civil courts. It used to be that armies on the march or in battle did not have the facilities to deal with mutiny less drastically so they would have to use summary execution, but these days that is probably not the case. The US executed one soldier for desertion in WWII, and that after a court martial. Still, it is the reason officers have sidearms.

It is worth considering that corporal punishment was also a lack of facilities issue. It is cruel and unusual now because prisons are available. But use of stocks or flogging or maiming are a sign of a society too poor to afford prisons. Justice must be seen to be done, and the punishment must be deserved. When a society is poor, it has to have punishments that still seem proportionate.

Those are oil wells.

First, I should point out that land area is not an issue for solar. http://www.csmonitor.com/Envir... But when we speak of wind or solar doing the whole job, (about our only choice when the oil, gas, coal and uranium run out) certainly we can see how some energy needs will require fuels. Aviation would be difficult without jet fuel. But synthetic hydrocarbon fuels are already a part of Sachs' Deep Decarbonization Pathways. http://unsdsn.org/what-we-do/d... Calm nights can be handled that way as well.