Comment Re:What if we overcorrect? (Score 1) 343
No I meant what I said. The report said that lighting electricity use is up, not just electricity use.
No I meant what I said. The report said that lighting electricity use is up, not just electricity use.
I recently read that at the same time light bulbs have gotten more efficient, total lighting power expenditure has gone up! Evidently, it's a combination of people using a lot more light when lighting gets cheaper to operate, and more ligthing being installed in general.
I can imagine if we start offsetting global warming we will produce more of its anthropogenic causes.
Whoops, no not 100megaton only about 16 pounds of TNT, I guess that is equal to a bomb vest, but far more specific targeting.
Freedom by any other name is still MIC autocracy.
Is that more or less than 100megaton yeild at PoI?
Because embracing anthropic climate change involves drastic controls on emissions, manufacturing, and energy generation
No because the oil industry has succesfully spread the lie that the necessary changes are drastic. Cutting emisions by 20% is not drastic, and does not change our way of life.
"More software projects have gone awry for lack of calendar time than for all other causes combined." -- Fred Brooks, Jr., _The Mythical Man Month_