If you'd started disciplining him when he as a toddler, then you wouldn't be dealing with a little monster that bites himself whenever you assert your authority in the slightest bit.
He IS a toddler. Any other useful suggestions? If not, just keep trolling anonymously.
Mod me down all you want, but everyone knows it's fucking true.
We can't mod you down, because you were too scared to make these comments under an accountable ID. I'll take your suggestions of discipline and punishment on board, but considering my son will react to stress and confusion by biting his own arm until he draws blood, I may have to take a bat to him to get your message across...
Since Steve Jobs died I cannot bear to see anyone use an iphone irreverently, what I did was a tribute to his memory.
This tweet was quoted in TFA. To be fair, he's quite funny when he wants to be - so "talentless" seems a harsh assessment.
It's yet another advert for Apple passing as a story.
I don't think so. Where's the pro-Apple angle? I must have missed these endorsements:
Apple - the paparazzi's choice. Protecting your privacy, while you invade someone else's...
Russell Brand, England's premier comedian, says "I only throw Apple phones, no other manufacturer's phones are weighted for the same distance and accuracy".
The iPhone - with an 18 month contract, it's a steal. (Off contract, it's a felony...)
Why is this a question?
Because this is an answer.
Who are you kidding?
Or, you really expect us to believe that Apple spent billions "inventing" rounded corners?
Should I respond to your straw man with an ad hominem? Nah, let's not bother tonight, eh?
They're essentially claiming voice control "on the internet" and I thought we had already established here on slashdolt that "...on the internet" patents are bullshit.
Er, no they're not.
Read the patent claim: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=8086604.PN.&OS=PN/8086604&RS=PN/8086604
You can't just repeat the same old nonsense and hope that no-one notices. It's not even specific to voice control, although does appear to be related to their implementation of Siri.
Yes, but that does not appear to be what they are claiming to have patented. What I took from the article is that they appeared to be claiming ownership on the very idea of being able to have a computer perform functions at the vocal request of an individual while using natural language, and not special commands.
Well, if you read the patent that I'd linked to below, you'd realise that isn't the case. I'm now certain that this is the patent under discussion - how on earth the FTA concluded it was patenting voice commands, I'll never know.
People should really see their BS for what is with these claims, seriously, they own voice control?
Except that's not what they're claiming. And if you'd bothered to read some portion of this thread (or God forbid, the patents that you're commenting on) you'd know that.
How about you post something to support your claim that Apple is afraid of ICS? Now that may be a valid and probably interesting comment. I'm not saying they're not, but your post contains nothing to validate your assertion.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
