Whilst I congratulate the man for subsidising research and giving to worthy causes I have to wonder if he would do so much if he was not one of the worlds richest man [sic].
This is some twisted logic.. Of course he wouldn't do so much if he weren't so rich! He would be incapable of doing so. While Microsoft's business practices are deserving of scrutiny, I fear most of the vitriol aimed at Microsoft and Gates is motivated by envy, or "tall poppy syndrome," or some variant. In the final analysis, the man is a successful business person who's earned his money, and can do with it as he pleases.
Parole and probation are two entirely different things.
Parole is deferred sentence from prison.
Probation is issued after you have spent some time in prison.
Actually, it's the other way around.
Texas and California deregulated power and now Texas and California have VERY high energy rates!
You can't get a nuclear power plant built in California, and that's "deregulated?" California may have deregulated some areas to increase competition in the utilities sector, but the glut of environmental regulations is making it nigh impossible to supply the state's electrical needs. It's the law of supply and demand.
I would say that it is impossible to have a stable society that is based on constant oppression of the majority, there is nothing inherent in socialism that requires oppression.
I'd have to disagree, at least on a macro scale. The basis of socialism is the redistrubtion of wealth/resources "from each according to his ability, to each according to their need." Who acts as the referee? What happens to people who don't get with the program? What incentive is there to work if the fruits of your labor may be forcibly taken from you to give to someone who's not as talented or hard-working? Private property ownership is a fundamental human right. Socialism rejects the idea by virtue of arbitrarily deciding who "needs" someone else's property. Just because a country implements an "imperfect" version of socialism only makes it less oppressive. I'll take the free market any day.
And their products will cease to sell if there's no benefit to using them over some cheaper and/or more reliable alternative. Why are some people onMonsanto are a company out to make money : They do not like being regulated, they do not like being restricted, like most companies it does not matter if their products actually work or are actually beneficial as long as they sell....
"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight