I've got 3 2 TB USB drives (encrypted -- about 700GB free). (1) Main drive with my data. (2) Backup (which get's synced nightly) and (3) one at my mother-in-laws house in a drawer.

Every year I buy a new drive to replace the (1). The old (1) becomes (2), the old (2) becomes (3). And (3) gets wiped and either given to friends/family or ebay. Also, drive (2) and (3) get swapped every week or so the "off site" drive is never more than a week or two out of sync.

I've been following a version of this procedure for 15 years (starting with IDE drive drawers) and increase size as necessary. So far I haven't had a drive completely fail once, although at the tail end of the life cycle of one I was begging to get some SMART errors.

Freedompop also offers free service. 200 mins/mo, 500 text and 500mb of data. Free. As in zero ($) dollars.

I picked up a cheap iphone 4s (sprint), activated it on FP and it is decent. It doesn't do great on the move (driving), but stationary, the voice quality isn't bad. Data speeds are around 1mbps +/- 500mbps.

Their app also offers a similar free service via an app (wifi only) sans data (for obvious reasons).

SURE there was... And I bet they found it on the moon, too. Geez. Crazy talk.

They aren't bad at all. While I won't say they are "great", I enjoyed watching them and they certainly weren't a waste of my time.

"Only 115 of those cases were classified as a stereotypical kidnapping "

That's right. And there are hundreds of unsolved child homicides each year that may or may not be part of that number as they are only provided to the FBI on a voluntary basis. And the stats you listed were with regards to ONLY that number.

There's also the FBI's National Crime Information Center (NCIC) which currently has something like 50k active missing juvenile cases which are not part of that classification because of unknown variables. 115 per year is a low ball number by any reasonable observation.

"Kidnapping as we general think of it (a stranger taking a child with nefarious intent) is exceptionally rare. In the United States, there are some 100 incidents per year."

That's not really accurate. it's some 100 incidents per year that are IDd as "stranger kidnapping". There are hundreds per year on top of that which are unsolved child homicides that are not included in that statistic.

http://www.deseretnews.com/art...

"But crime experts warn that statistics about child homicides and how often such cases are solved are imperfect. Participation in the FBI's Supplementary Homicide Report program is entirely voluntary. Many police departments decline to report how many cases they've solved or how many cases involved juvenile victims."

You are only as good as the numbers you are given to work with. I'd rather go with reported missing numbers (which are more accurate) then try to whittle it down than look at numbers that aren't consistently or completely reported to the FBI. This is one of the issues I have with these numbers and reports of how the numbers appear today.

"Despite the fact that crime rates are less than half of what they were 20 years ago and that you were are far more risk than your kids would be? "

~150k reported missing in 1980 vs. almost a million last year. Granted, most of those are resolved, but the numbers suggest kidnappings aren't the same type of crime as gang, theft or violence. They are not going down. You've got about 800k which were juveniles (half of which were runaways). 200k of the other half were abductions by relatives. That leaves about 200k missing kids that weren't resolved quickly or at all.

" What distance is appropriate, then? I think it's much more an "either/or" - you are either too young or old enough to walk home alone. Distance is immaterial."

For a 10 and 6 year old? Across the street. With a parent or guardian waiting on the porch as they exit the school. Or any distance with an older kid present (say 13 or older). And distance is NOT immaterial. You cannot remove risk entirely, you can only reduce it. Distance adds time. The less time they are walking alone, the lower the risk.

"That said, the neighborhood/region may be more than safe enough. I know I wouldn't sweat it in many locales, but others I wouldn't feel safe walking alone..."

I mention that in my original post. However, I feel 10 is just too prime a target for a number of peds.

"It bears repeating though that it is also terribly unusual - more so now than it was in the '80s. We live in a far, far safer (although not perfect) world today then we did when we were kids by almost every possible measurement."

It's not safe enough. We have predators stalking our children. We wouldn't send them in to the hills alone with known mountain lions -- why on the streets? To do is is playing a type of roulette with your kids. Sooner or later green double zeros are going to come up and someone is going to lose their chips.

I'm not saying to disallow independence. What I am saying to to be "smarter" about it. The FA mentions that the children walked together. Great. That shouldn't happen until the eldest is 12 or maybe 13 and preferably there's more than just two of them walking home. Two -- and two that young is just too much risk. You'll never get the risk to zero, but somethings can dramatically reduce that risk.

Every town/city in the US is different as far as risk. That said, the risk that a child will be kidnapped is not zero.

My daughter was kidnapped*. She was 10 years old at the time. I feel I have "some" input to offer...

I feel the parents were stupid to allow their children at this age to walk that distance alone. My opinion of this can be argued to be colored by the events in my families life, yes. Yet I believe I'm right on this issue. I also believe that the decision to allow their children to do this was THEIR choice. The kids were together which is a plus. The eldest was 10 years old which fills me with concern. I do not believe they irresponsibility put their children in danger to the level of calling CPS on them. This was just over kill.

Background: At 10 years old I was getting up at 4:30 in the morning to deliver newspapers (1980's Los Angeles County). I would never allow my children to do this today. I also walked and/or rode a bike to/from school from 3rd grade-9th grade. The distances were all less than 2 miles. I got a ride TO high school (10th-12th) and took a bus back -- it was a hike. I'd be hard pressed to allow my kids to go to/from school on their own before high-school.

*My daughter was recovered some 12 hours later alive. The monster who took her is facing 3 life sentences + 300+ years on various counts and has yet to go to trial (probably will happen within the next 3-4 months)

" I am fairly confident that some Asian, long before the Write brothers, had a decent working flying machine."

And it wouldn't matter if they had. The Wright brothers are the fathers of modern aviation. Period. It doesn't matter that the Vikings may have "discovered" the Americas centuries before Columbus -- or the Chinese centuries before that. What matters is who "discovered" it last and in a way where the discovery "stuck".

I picked up a Nokia 520 (Windows Phone 8.0 -- upgradable to 8.1) brand new for ~$30 on Amazon. You can find it around at that price (for example. Fry's has it for $29 after their "promo code" takes off $10). It's a "prepaid go phone" but just drop an ATT sim in it and you are golden with any type of account.

I picked it up as a spare in case my iphone 5 dies (son somehow talked me in to giving him my old 4s).

It's actually a decent phone. Snappy, responsive, light and decent battery life. The interface takes some getting used to, but it's not terrible.

Yes. She refuses until I remove them. (heh).

"I am over 50 and have always had astigmatism, and deal with the lingering and ever-changing effects of a shingles scar on one cornea, so my glasses are anything by simple. "

I got lucky. My eyes were originally astigmatic (and at 90 degree axis difference per eye) but for some reason they magically went normal around my 30th birthday. Further, I was slightly nearsighted in one eye and slightly far sighted in the other. Again, they magically changed around my 30th birthday. One of my retinas does sport a scar from looking at a solar eclipse back in the 70's (I was a stupid 5th grader) -- not much I can do about that.

Then around my 40-something year, my arms stared to grow short... My solution is a single, short lens pair of glasses that sit on the tip of my nose which I push up for "normal use" when sitting in front of a computer or reading a book. My guess is I'll be moving on the progressives or bi/tri focals eventually, but for now, this works very well for me.