POT is a constitutionally protected privacy interest. The airwaves are not.

Facebook just hasn't thrown enough money at him yet.

When they do...then we'll see.

If those cameras get suspended drivers off the road, I'm totally for it. They're suspended for a reason.

If you can't build a base without people, then you're not ready yet and you're just wasting your money.

Don't be surprised. Hitler's SS had its share of PhDs.

While 10,000 years of a perpetual orgasm would be kind of cool, I don't think organizations like the CIA and the KGB would be much interested. They'd be more interested in 10,000 years of pain and torment.

I can think of few things more evil than this.

Intentionally driving people mad is torture. Rearranging people's brains to make them docile servants of the state is Stalinist.

Anybody who thinks this kind of torture would be limited to time dilation is a moron. Think pain dilation. Anybody who thinks this would be limited to child rapists is an even bigger moron. Think dissidents.

Everything about this stinks. The author would have made a sweet servant of Henry VIII....

Torture. Is. Bad.

We should have a US base in EVERY country! But that wouldn't be imperialist now, would it?

Is Putin really trying to engineer a phony Hitleresque provocation? The sanctions need to get upped big time. I doubt Russia would mobilize for war behind that gluttonous kleptocrat.

It can't take care of its people. It's army is a shambles.

But it does have nuclear weapons. Just like Pakistan.

Whoop-de-do!

Does the NSA rearrange bits on cable-connected computers in the USA without a warrant?

Please pardon the John McEnroe reference!

The cops have two choices: (1) Breach the contract and pay damages; or (2) Violate the Constitution.

The choice is obvious and the excuse is absurd.

Are you people really trying to drive us away?

Person A independently devises a set of computer instructions that make it possible for any person with a cheap 3D printer to create a unique and specific product that, if created, would be patentable. The product is not created.

Person B independently does exactly the same thing--except that the instructions are written in English.

B is not patentable under patent law (and it shouldn't be). A shouldn't be patentable, either. Otherwise, we'll get people who'll write instructions for making old, patent-expired stuff and expect to get a patent for their instructions.

Software patents are garbage.