Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:antipiracy (Score 1) 320

I've never seen this happen in the 25+ hours I've played Left 4 Dead 2, if it pops up saying you need to login again just shift-tab back to the game.
Otherwise, set Steam to offline mode before starting L4D2, that could help (only single player and LAN play available). Good luck, great game and wouldn't want you to miss out!

Comment Re:Yeah, but where does this get ME? (Score 2, Informative) 973

If you watch live television, you are supposed to pay for a TV license. This includes on DVT or other digital television receivers plugged directly into a PC (it's a television reception license rather than the physical television object license, which does actually mean you can have a TV that's unable to receive broadcast television and not have to pay the license). Iplayer is more tricky due to the ability to stream the live BBC channels, but certainly watching the recorded shows (playback later/catchup tv) is fine without a TV license.

Comment Not 'unfair' (Score 5, Insightful) 267

"The result is often that those who carry out online or casual work do so for surprisingly low rates of pay, with no job security or protection from unfair terms and practices," an employment lawyer told PC Pro.

As these are essentially individual contracts that are not amended at any point, it is easy to see the trade you are making (your time for their money). Although these deals may be bad ones, noone is forced to accept them and so accepting and completing these bad deals is entirely up to the individual. If someone values their time at this low amount, let them!

Comment Re:I wonder how long until it "accidentally" leaks (Score 4, Informative) 1224

Let us say, for the sake of argument, that you live in the middle of the fucking desert a couple of thousand years ago.

You are (by accident of birth) quite high in your society's hierarchy - but a lot of things that we take for granted these days simply don't exist in the middle of this fucking desert.

There's no police force.

There's no farm subsidies (though there are farmers, it's a hard life being a farmer in the middle of a fucking desert).

The last couple of years have been tough - there's virtually no water (though the people in the next country have a number of rivers...). As a consequence, many of your people are starving.

There may or may not be such a thing as conscription, but keeping morale up in your army is damn hard. You can barely feed them, FFS.

There is precious little that would be recognised as a legal system two thousand years hence.

There's no international aid - it's every man for himself.

There's little education - those who aren't from a wealthy background (which 99% of your countrymen aren't) don't necessarily understand exactly how bad things are or how best to improve them.

What your people need to survive is some better farmland. And you know exactly what you need to get it - water. Easiest way to get this is to re-settle as many people as you can next to the neighbour's river. Your neighbour is likely to object, however, so you'll have to take it by force. How on Earth do persuade thousands of people to take up arms and invade your neighbour?

Well, like most leaders you're fundamentally a politician. Two thousand years from now you'd spin your people some line about how this neighbouring country has big scary weapons, but that doesn't work so well here because nuclear weapons aren't going to be invented for some time.

The most powerful thing you have available is your own local myths and legends - which include legends about how the world was created by an all-powerful being. Most of your people believe pretty firmly in them. So you spin them a line about how this all-powerful being has promised them the world - on condition they take on any "non-believers". And by an amazing coincidence, there's a whole bunch of non-believers in the next country.

Comment Re:Isn't that called an... (Score 1) 349

Initial 'h' is actually dropped considerably more frequently in UK English than US English; e.g. "an 'istoric event" in British but "a historic event" in American.

I think you must have only been speaking to cockney geezers from the 30s or watching too much Oliver Twist.. "shine your shoes guv" The majority of the rest of us pronounce Hs almost always and this is often played on for laughs when someone is imitating a 'posh' English speaker.

Comment Re:But why? (Score 5, Informative) 497

Not only this, but Mass Effect 2 for PC was out 4 days before release, entirely cracked and working, rending ALL the effort that went into the DRM scheme useless even on day 1, annoying SOLELY for the legal purchaser.
...This is ridiculous!!
Check out a torrent site for confirmation on this, s'all true.

Comment Re:Well at this rate (Score 1) 438

I'm not sure you technically *are* a criminal if you've just obtained a copy of a film without paying, only if you're uploading during your p2ping are you actually illegally distributing copyrighted material. I'm not sure if there is a law against just having a piece of media without authorization, though if someone more enlightened does know, please respond.

Comment Emotionally charged sexism term (Score 1) 1255

"For instance, I am currently part of an email conversation with a prominent FOSS community member who has been pilloried who is hurt and baffled that I (or anyone else) could apply the word "sexism" to them. Their reasoning? They did not intend to be sexist, so therefore they can't possibly be. Therefore, labelling their behavior as unacceptable is unfair, they argue. The fact that, in context, their actions and remarks could not possibly be described in any other way honestly does not seem to have occurred to them. No matter what I say, they remain hurt and baffled -- and, like so many, deeply in denial."

The version of sexism as I see it(and I'm guessing most people in the UK/western world) is sexism *is* an intentional chauvinistic attitude, http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=sexism and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexism are the main things I am looking at right now. I can see that sexism may technically mean "the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to, less competent, or less valuable than the other", but this would mean that their intentions would be very important into determining what is meant. Using an emotionally charged word like that to describe someone without defining it would hurt most people, there is no reason to be surprised here.

I believe there might well be some bias in the FOSS world against women (although I've never encountered it due to working on fair few projects) and this should be rallied against (it's just foolish to be biased and helps noone, the project would suffer from fewer contributors), but labelling it sexism places it close to "women should be in the kitchen" thinking in my mind and is unproductive and will lead to defensiveness and even resentment from the male community for being labelled as such. It seems as if the author can't understand why someone might be hurt by being labelled a sexist.

In all, this doesn't seem to be very objective or useful reporting and is purely to get clicks and links onto his site and stir up some debate. In my opinion. :D

Slashdot Top Deals

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...