Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:That, or... (Score 1) 258

First: Stop having encounters with snowbanks.
Second: Buy a Haynes manual, then go visit a junkyard and see if they have your parts.
You will never make a part for less than it cost the automotive industry to make that part. It's a matter of finding someone who will sell it without too much markup.

Comment Re:Of course it's under fire (Score 1) 152

I basically agree with almost all of what you've written there. However, I think that blog postings and one line quotes to journalists amount to a lot of opinion. That's fine, but it feels like holding a megaphone up to the side conversations at a conference. We can have "real time analysis" without doing it at the top of our lungs on the front lawn. This is how a conversation at a cocktail party turns into an announcement of life on Mars.

At any rate, this is all premature. According to Zimmer:

Critics say that a few straightforward tests on the bacteria would show whether they really do have arsenic-based DNA once and for all. And the NASA scientists say they're ready to hand out GFAJ-1 to researchers who want to study it.

So, in a few months we'll either have some very interesting findings from experiments performed to everyone's liking...or a editorial in Science about how the original paper got through.

Comment Re:Of course it's under fire (Score 1) 152

This will play out in the journals, not the pages of Slate. Either the method is sound, or it isn't. Either the findings can be duplicated, or they can't. It may take (gasp) at least a few months to see which it is.

Scientists can be such whiny, arrogant assholes...whatever happened to science being done for science, rather than recognition?

Scientists are not saints. Science involves a lot of non-science: finding funding, managing teams, etc. and some people are into outmaneuvering others. As in any other profession, some percentage of scientists are the kind of whiny, arrogant assholes that would attempt to embarrass their colleagues in a mass-market publication rather than put the critique where it belongs: The letters section of Science.

Comment Re:Sorry, no "dirty tricks" campaign here... (Score 1) 1060

So in other words, he could be trying to hold the US by the balls and say I'm going to break the law and if you try to arrest me for it, I'm going to release more info that will damage you even more.

This is where he messed up. The US cannot allow itself to be blackmailed in public. It's along the lines of "We don't negotiate with terrorists." Maybe you do, maybe you don't, but you certainly don't want anyone to think that terrorism (or in this case, and "insurance" file) is a good way to get you to negotiate.

Comment Re:Nobel Prize (Score 1) 919

Do you think any of the diplomats involved were surprised by any of the revelations in the cables?

Of course not. It's their trade. But the diplomats take their orders from politicians, who may now feel the need to put on a show for their populace. People react differently in front of an audience.

Comment Re:Gov't Sponsored DDoS (Score 1) 919

The US government has overthrown democratic governments, it's FBI has assassinated American civilians, the CIA is currently torturing someone to death in a secret prison somewhere in the world, and right now it has the right to extra-judiciously assassinate any person, even US citizens, that it believes to be involved in terrorism. With these facts, I hardly think an orchestrated DDoS attack seems unlikely.

Given that list, an orchestrated DDoS attack seems incredibly restrained.

Slashdot Top Deals

FORTRAN is not a flower but a weed -- it is hardy, occasionally blooms, and grows in every computer. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...