Submission + - Google bans anti-MoveOn.org ads (examiner.com)
An anonymous reader writes: According to this story,
http://www.examiner.com/a-983100~Robert_Cox__Google_bans_anti_MoveOn_org_ads.html
Google has banned advertisements critical of MoveOn.org, the far-left advocacy group that caused a national uproar last month when it received preferential treatment from The New York Times for its "General Betray Us" message. Google claims the ads were removed and would not be allowed to resume because they violated Google's trademark policy. Interestingly, Google appears to be selectively enforcing its policy, routinely permitting the unauthorized use of company names such as Exxon, Wal-Mart, Cargill and Microsoft in advocacy ads. An anti-war ad currently running on Google asks "Keep Blackwater in Iraq?" and links to an article titled "Bastards at Blackwater — Should Blackwater Security be held accountable for the deaths of its employees?"
Are you troubled by Google's censorship, or is it OK (or even desireable and neccesary for the good of the USA) to suppress the political speech of conservative people and parties you disagree with?
http://www.examiner.com/a-983100~Robert_Cox__Google_bans_anti_MoveOn_org_ads.html
Google has banned advertisements critical of MoveOn.org, the far-left advocacy group that caused a national uproar last month when it received preferential treatment from The New York Times for its "General Betray Us" message. Google claims the ads were removed and would not be allowed to resume because they violated Google's trademark policy. Interestingly, Google appears to be selectively enforcing its policy, routinely permitting the unauthorized use of company names such as Exxon, Wal-Mart, Cargill and Microsoft in advocacy ads. An anti-war ad currently running on Google asks "Keep Blackwater in Iraq?" and links to an article titled "Bastards at Blackwater — Should Blackwater Security be held accountable for the deaths of its employees?"
Are you troubled by Google's censorship, or is it OK (or even desireable and neccesary for the good of the USA) to suppress the political speech of conservative people and parties you disagree with?