Comment Re:Fad over? (Score 1) 166
They should keep the original melody and syncopation, but they should play it in really whacked-out "80's b-movie" style metal guitar.
They should keep the original melody and syncopation, but they should play it in really whacked-out "80's b-movie" style metal guitar.
I forgot the photo shoots FHM did of Anderson, as well.
Also, considering the stars basically stated publicly that they had some romance going on and had considered marriage, what does it matter if Mulder is getting any action with Scully? Duchovny was (maybe is) getting action with Anderson. The best thing the show could do is keep the tension high by not having the characters hook up.
There is a "new McGyver" project going, involving the original producer (or was it the original writer?)
A new Quantum Leap would be cool. There's a pretty cool John Maus song by the same title that's kind of about the same subject.
If it's wanking you're concerned with, maybe you should do a google search for the images of Anderson (and Duchovny perhaps) that Rolling Stone did.
Well then. Unless your figures are wrong (who knows?) then I guess I stand corrected.
"What are you trying to do, destroy us all?!"
-- Zac Hobbes, The Quiet Earth
Who bears the risk of junior spilling a juice cup all over the current heating furnace?
Obviously the server should be kept in the utility room (or basement) where junior doesn't usually play, and protected within some housing that doubles as a means of keeping the hot air collected so it can be ventilated at specific places throughout the home.
I think this idea sounds like a bunch of
*takes of glasses*
* YAAAAGGGGHHHHHHHH *
Applying the same explosive force required to blow up the Moon to blowing up a portion of the Earth instead would only be "more devastating" if you are purely measuring devastation potential in terms of forces of impact or explosive forces.
Don't forget that by and large, the opinion of the Moon in its relationship with life on Earth is more or less "vital". We have no idea what would happen to our weather and atmosphere, our oceans and water tables, or our life cycles if the Moon were obliterated.
All of the fools in this thread mentioning "meteorite bombardment" have not the foggiest. Moonquakes are a lot more powerful and a lot deeper than the faint tremors that would be caused by surface impacts.
But that's no surprise that people aren't interested in moonquakes or never heard of them before, even if they're lunar scientists. Even NASA didn't want to acknowledge their existence at first.
But look at them, now: http://science.nasa.gov/scienc...
The truth is that nobody is sure what causes the most powerful moonquakes.
I didnt see ay mention of moonquakes. Considering these are a real and verified occurrence and considering the considerable amount of energy they release as has been recorded, any prediction of the structural integrity of lava tubes in the moon that doesnt take moonquakes into account is likely to be wrong.
It would appear that Wikipedia redirects "Uruguay syndrome" to Nuclear_meltdown#China_syndrome.
Out of the like, 3 of these continuation series that I took a look at a couple of years ago, this was IMHO the best one that was getting the least attention. I'm glad to hear that they've made it through their kickstarter.
Probably so. I just checked the incoming updates and the problematic one was in the list, and I do have VS2010 installed. However, I did not install the particular subgroup of tools that the patch is mentioned to target. Good thing I crawled through the list looking for the specific KB#'s of incoming updates and unchecked it. If I were less cautious I would have been hitting "Install" feeling safe under the assumption that since I didn't have those tools installed in VS2010 that I would not be targeted for that update.
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.