Yes, that is a principal of relativity: all inertial frames are equivalent.

You should have seen the Talk page. The page was closed as it was deemed "clearly promotional". Here is the text of the page that I managed to get up in about 10-15 commits before it was deleted:

In an attemt to make a real source for info about Devuan aside from that horrendous page, I've created a wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Please help me fill it out with information and sources. Thanks!

Thank you. I've never worked with image processing before but I just might look into it. I appreciate your advice.

I belive that there is software used for astronomy photography available which performs this function, but I've not found anything satisfactory. Is there any software that you could recommend, seeing as you seem to have written some yourself? Thanks!

You might notice that there exist only two industries in which the customer is called "a user".

Exactly. Now I can get off Adblock and start contributing to the websites I visit.

I would happily pay $1-3 per month for an ad-free but publishers-making-money web. I think that they found the sweet spot of enough money to fund the program vs. too expensive for most web users. I signed up before even reading the comments here, I've been waiting for this for years.

I would love to see your pruned list. See this SuperUser thread, for which I put a bounty on but never got a good answer:
http://superuser.com/questions...

This was recently asked on Super User (a StackExchange site) but got no good answers:
http://superuser.com/questions...

The comet's axis which appears to spin in a counterclockwise direction from above is its north pole. From a location in which the pole is perpendicular to the angle of view, east is the direction against the comet's rotation, i.e. the direction which appears to be rotating towards you.

Admittedly, this is somewhat difficult to imagine for a non-spherical object, but it works out.

Thanks. Going through this thread I do see that the consensus is against the use of port 465. I find this strange, but not the strangest thing that I've seen this week. Thank you.

MTA to MTA is still on port 25, yes, but mail submission via a MUA is no longer recommended on port 25, and many ISPs specifically block 25 as an anti-spam measure.

MUA submission is done on:
1) Port 587 plaintext, or
2) Port 587 encrypted by specifying STARTTLS, or
3) Port 465 encrypted

I've not heard that 465 is depreciated until now, and in fact I actively avoid STARTTLS so I use it.

I am aware of port 25 being depreciated, but not 465. Is there an RFC that I should be reading? I still submit mail specifically on port 465 so that I can avoid STARTTLS and require encryption. Of course, seeing how I manage the MTA I have that luxury.

If port 465 is no longer recommended I would like to know when and why that happened. Thanks.

In this case, sending email over TLS is akin to browsing the web over TLS: You let the browser / MTA handle the encryption at a lower OSI layer than the application layer. Thus, it works transparently and without hassle to the end user. Would you suggest using GPG to manually encrypt and decrypt all your communication with any HTTPS website?

Note that the STARTTLS command is a fix for using port 587 to send encrypting mail instead of the port which is dedicated to it: port 465. It is like sending HTTPS down port 80 with a special flag. Properly configured MTAs should be using port 465 for email over TLS instead of port 587 with a "special flag".

Uzi Nissan might have an issue with the use of his name:
http://nissan.com/