I bet that rather conveniently doesn't include the 'civil rights' of non-whites to FORCE themselves into the living space and lives of white people who don't want to live with them, does it.
that's the equivalent of saying that your right to a peaceful life interferes with my right to murder you. you have it backwards.
White people don't have the right to simply associate with ONLY their own kind.
yes they do, don't leave your house and don't invite any non-whites in and your dillema is solved.Unless you believe that not to be sufficient and wish not only to avoid associating with non-whites but also wish for them to be completely removed from anywhere which you may wish to travel to.
Can any Slashdot idiots tell me why?
while i would not consider myself an idiot the answer is actually rather simple - consider this scenario:
Point 1: 'Person A' is a white person who wishes to only associate with whites and have no non-whites be allowed in any areas he frequents
Point 2: 'Person B' is a white person who wishes to only associate with whites and have no non-blacks be allowed in any areas he frequents
Point 3: Both 'Person A' and 'Person B' like to frequent 'Area Z'
There are only two solutions to solve this dillemma to keep the rights of both 'Person A' and 'Person B'
Solution 1: Neither 'Person A' not 'Person B' are allowed to enter 'Area Z'
Solution 2: Both 'Person A' and 'Person B' are allowed to enter 'Area Z'
Solution 1 forces the ruling that ones 'right' to never associate with people of other races trumphs the 'right' to enter 'Area Z'
Solution 2 gives both 'Person A' and 'Person B' the choice as to whether they feel the right to enter 'Area Z' is more important than their 'right' to not associate with people of other races.
How I laugh at your so-called 'critical thinking' skills. 99% of you are morons who can't think for yourselves, and I could easily prove that by destroying you in an anonymous online debate.
please respond.