"Think about what it was doing while you weren't watching. Think about it!!!"

Well, it does have 4 right hands. That leaves 4 left hands to type with.

Video, or it didn't happen.

Are these couples in this video? If so, maybe it's a clue that they're going straight after Apple on the next release, and naming the OS "Cougar".

Perhaps the Malaysian government would like me to send them back the nesi lemak I had for lunch today, since they claim it is theirs? I expect it to be ready to... ummmm... "ship" by morning.

Ikea office furniture floats. Noted for future reference.

... me pack the car for vacation.

I embed all my documents in porn and post them on various web forums. The recovery procedure involves spidering my spam folder. I recently found my high school history term paper in a jpg of Marylin Chambers.

And wording such a ban so that it cannot be gamed, loopholed, or turned on its ass - without using legalese - would be an interesting exercise.

Legal issues are very black and white, very binary. If the criterion is "all", and "all" is invalidated - even by one exception - then the whole proposition is out. "Any" by itself leaves "all" as optional. "All that apply" is what "any and all" means in legalese, except that "that apply" is not left to your own interpretation, but instead means something like "all that are not barred by superseding legal restrictions or obligations". They could use that phrase, but using "any and all", which phrases it as a positive obligation, instead shifts the burden on you to prove that something is barred, instead of them to prove that something isn't. All of this hyper-parsed language is, of course, just a substitute for honest communication. It is, in fact, intended to avoid communication and understanding, while at the same time locking in the consequences as tightly as possible.

BTW, IANAL, and I am making this all up as I go along. I bet its pretty close to correct. Of course, any and all of it could be flat out wrong.

Its a demand to be complied with. Lets say you have ten accounts, but one of them carries some legal prohibition on revealing it (setting aside the larger problems with the whole idea, we're being fine-print pedantic here...). If you can show that you are not required to provide that one account, "list all..." by itself means that you can now list none and be in full compliance. "Any and all" means that you still have to list the other nine. In other words, it is the legal way of saying don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good, just in case the demand for "all" becomes invalidated.

"All your base are belong to us" legally implies that if even one base is found to not belong to us, then it is possible that none of them do - the statement is false in its entirety. "Any and all of your base belong to us" means that if we accidentally let one of your bases slip through our fingers, the remainder still belong to us. To a lawyer, internet memes are full of loopholes and thus not binding.

But It's Not Google

Let's see.... you could meet a beautiful girl and fall madly in love and have sex for free for the rest of your life...

Or... you could meet Ray the Pimp and pay $50 bucks for a night with his "best" girl, Grizelda. She even has most of her teeth!

And then you find out at the last minute that she'll sell you condoms for $200 each. No, the one in your wallet is not "compatible".

Sure Microsoft is the simple choice. In the same sense as the simplicity of Winston Smith's television viewing choices.

Pull out, already, Steve. America's asshole is sore enough.

On the other hand, Steve himself is a good candidate for the title "America's Asshole". I'm all for anyone with financial clout standing up to Obama and congress, but the enemy of my enemy is not automatically my friend.