no fabrication, I say something does not exist. I say that which does not exist is used as basis for junk science such as this paper. The non-sequiturs are between your ears, logic fails you.

you are confused, "nothing to back it up". the complete lack of records with precision of tenth of a degree C are the proof, the fabricated charts of such from even 120 years ago are the proof

pure bullshit

his 300 employees (at the time) were in 40 field offices

the reality is he pushes scams to increase the value of his "green" portfolio, while living hedonist lifestyle in that mansion that takes power of 20+ families, all the whle telling us to decrease our standard of living and energy consumption. hypocrite of the vilest sort.

I don't recall the Koch brothers saying I had to reduce my energy usage and carbon footprint, while sitting in a house that drew the power of 20+ families

no, the trade off is that a copter with one or two main rotors can actually lift something and stay aloft for more than mere minutes. The product is a scam to lure investors with no engineering knowledge.

when is the last time you heard of the big rotor (and/or its "Jesus nut") failing?

you are funny, the miniscule percentage of government spending that goes to Microsoft is a budget rounding error

And if Microsoft fell, those people would do other things for a living, maybe even get a few good companies while losing one giant crappy one

now we're treated like terrorists and crimminals, so much better

You bring up an often-argued completely silly scenario.

Neither the government nor the U.S. armed forces would survive the use of such weapons on the populace. The military would fall apart.

news for you, most state constitutions already state that. Mine does.

forget it, one big-ass rotor is far more efficient and generates far more lift than a bunch of small ones. that thing has 20 minute flight time, and needs by their words a "range extender" for more than that, a combustion engine. there is a reason basics of helicopter design has not changed in decades, nothing else makes sense.

you're not an engineer, are you. Maybe you should think of the weight of the fuel it would take to power eight (one adult one ultralight frame) engines for even 20 minutes at max thrust. Answer, 120 liters, 96 kilos of kerosene. Oops, guess we need another engine to lift that....

I'm not sure your traffic control people should be in the air, maybe they could be in a kind of tower high enough to at least see both ends of the asphalt strips. One problem is that the drivers of these flying cars might anthropomorphize the tower and start addressing it as "tower" when talking over a radio to the traffic control people in the tower. Another would be the difficulty in seeing the license plates on the flying cars, maybe bigger numbers could be painted on the sides of the vehicle toward the tail end.

I thought the green way was everyone getting a house like Al Gore's that takes the energy of 20+ normal family houses.

You are the one who doesn't understand how money is made with open source software, or even most closed source software for that matter.

You seem fixated on the mistaken notion that paying for software is what drives the business, open or closed. it does not.