Comment Re:Problem here is "racism" (Score 1) 915
Faith takes up where reason leaves off.
For example, I have to believe it when I'm told that I was born of a chimp. I also have to believe it when I'm told that Jesus was born of a virgin.
Faith takes up where reason leaves off.
For example, I have to believe it when I'm told that I was born of a chimp. I also have to believe it when I'm told that Jesus was born of a virgin.
Oh but being "the God of Abraham" is the absolute fundamental property. Check this reference out:
Exodus 3:15 Moreover God said to Moses, "Thus you shall say to the children of Israel: 'The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you. This is My name forever, and this is My memorial to all generations.'
There are three peoples descended from Abraham:
You're right about Islam not accepting that Jesus is the son God.
I wonder why your post hasn't been given points for informativeness.
I'm from India and a Christian. Here, this is a hard fact for many "staunch" Christians to accept. I'd like to be absolutely clear that I'm not one of them staunch ones.
According to Scriptural evidence (what is left to us - supposedly) of ALL three religions (Islam, Christianity, & Judaism), the God is the same. Yet, strangely, I have yet to observe an explicit attempt by either religious or political leaders to help the masses understand this.
Open acknowledgement of this fundamental truth by religious leaders of ALL THREE religions would do a lot to improve relations and understanding. So why is it not being done? Or am I not aware of such efforts? Do correct me if I'm wrong.
Am I being too paranoid when I assume that most leaders are using religion quite conveniently to herd people about?
Some of my feelings, exactly.
To which a person who is a "believer" would immediately say, "Easy, God wants to test those humans to see if they are willing to obey his commands."
Faith is beyond logic. So it is very difficult to reason with it. Rather, the only thing that works is either of two things: Being aggressive (though not overly) OR being non-aggressive. If you're being aggressive, you better be sure that you really have strength because it's going to be sorely tested. Extremism likes to "swarm". If you're going to be non-aggressive, you have to be ready to prove that too by being very "correct".
What IS respected is the "right" mixture of being "strong" YET "correct". "Strong" can also mean "capable" as well as "savvy". "Correct" just means what is "acceptable" to each group. Each group has its own version of "correct". From what I have read of scientists, it is pretty much the same. Each group lobbying away, clamoring that theirs is the "correct" version. It's the same with politicians.
What I'm trying to say is that it seems to be innate (though inane) and inevitable for any group of humans to start the "pissing wars" - as another commenter has put it - with one or more groups of humans. Country-wise, race-wise, region-wise, religion-wise, street-wise, class-wise, family-wise, any-wise and every-wise, no matter which way we humans group together, we'll have dissentions and further factions.
We, humans, have to change ourselves at a fundamental level. If we're not careful, some sort of crazy population inversion could occur where we're all drawn into partaking of the battle lust no matter who we are, what we look like, where we're from, and what we stand for. There's nothing good down that path.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker