Ethically, nothing.

Legally, photographing a woman in a state of partial or complete undress is explicitly illegal. Photographing a fully clothed woman from an angle that exposes her undergarments (or lack there of) is not.

Expect to see this law amended very shortly, as most residents that state probably already thought upskirtting was illegal.

Not for me. Without a $35/month phoneline, it costs me $45. Not significantly cheaper than my Comcast bill.

Don't I also need to know that the other person is breaking the law? I don't have a radar system in my car, how an I to know if they are speeding?

I'm not saying corruption is good, I'm just saying fraud != corruption. Medicare fraud, where bills are issued and paid for services that did not take place, is not the same as corruption. The article cited even mentioned that basically all bills are paid, and that they try to find the fraud after the fact. So, no preferential treatment, no deliberate intervention by officials, not corruption. Not good, but not corruption.

Also of note, the $130 billion is not the amount of corruption, it is the cost to the economy in loss of growth.

The article is about corruption (bribing officials and whatnot) not fraud.

So, that doesn't really put anything in perspective.

Yes, 70% of browsers supported regions, but that leave 30% that don't. If you're designing a website that ~1/3 of users can not view properly, I think we can assume you're doing something wrong.

This brings us to an issue that the article doesn't seem to address, just how widely used are regions? Is the average Chrome user even going to notice the loss of support?

They were fined 5 weeks worth of profit, not income (revenue). While it may still sting, it is quite different from 5 weeks of revenue.

"You can die because you ran out of money, or donate an organ," is most definitely coercion.

This also allows the family to object post-mortem. Without the next-of-kin signing off the harvest doesn't happen. There simply isn't time to wait for a court order enforcing the deceased's wishes

ROFLMAO!

You do realize that rags like The National Enquirer and The Sun are "traditional" journalists.

Wrong on many levels.

Chickens will respond just fine to 3k~4k fluorescents (metal halide or high pressure sodium work fine too, but I don't need that much light).

Houses built in the 30s were pretty rarely insulated, and even more rarely wrapped with a vapor barrier. This was a relatively common building practice until after WWII. (Remember, building codes and inspections didn't really begin until the 60s) The engineering necessary to circulate air using nothing but the convection currents caused by light bulbs would be daunting even with today's computing power.

Modern homes are wrapped up pretty tightly, but they rely on mechanical air movement (either forced air heating, or a whole house fan).

Every time I see Google Glass, I am disappointed they can't just scoop my pathetic biological eyes out with a melon baller and replace them with some Ono-Sendai beauties.

But, what happens when the stupid meat-bag in the "driver's" seat decides to hit the brakes, or fiddle with the steering wheel while in a train? Or a tire blows out? By the time you're close enough to draft the car in front of you, I would imagine you are too close for even a computer to avoid an accident (mechanical limits vs. reaction times).

As much as I would love to see this, I don't think we will until there are no manual controls inside the car.

Google doesn't add permissions to anything. That's done by the developer. And any app that adds permissions will not auto-update until you have reviewed the new permissions and accepted them again.