How is having a city in one big line a great idea? It's a monumentally dumb idea. Do you know any livable city on Earth where the furthest points are 170km apart? If you made it a square or a circle, you'd cover the same surface area with a much smaller maximum distance between two points in the city.

Wow, so the megaproject failed? Well, nobody saw that coming.

Except, of course, for everybody.

Uh... sexuality is a pretty basic thing you need to know about in life. Things like safe sex, contraception, consent... these are fundamental to a healthy life. And parents don't always teach them properly.

Religion, I agree, should not be taught ins chools. Leave that nonsense to the parents, should they choose to indoctrinate their kids.

In my city's public library system, anyone can request that the library purchase a particular book. AFAIK, these requests are pretty much always granted.

Although I live in Canada, which is often derided as less friendly to freedom of expression than the United States, I am proud that my city's library removed precisely zero of the materials that were challenged.

Is there nothing productive that you enjoy doing so much that you would do it for free?

Yes. There is. I maintain a number of open-source software packages.

But I do that for me, not for an employer. The minute someone else gets to dictate what work I should do, you'd better believe I'll only do it in return for payment.

However, separating your work from your personal onto two separate devices is very good for security and for privacy. IMO, it's worth it.

I'm retired now, but when I was working I had a simple fix for not mixing work and personal stuff on my phone: I didn't give my employer my cell phone number (I had a landline... they got that) and I didn't set up any work-related stuff on my phone.

That's a good thing, though. You shouldn't mix your work and personal devices.

Slashdot continues its April 1st tradition, I see...

Of course. There's no need for a gearbox in an EV, so any sort of transmission that relies on changing gear ratios is pointless.

I currently drive a stick-shift and I enjoy it for completely irrational reasons. I know it doesn't save fuel. I know I'm not "more connected" to the car. I just like having more to do when driving; keeps me alert and engaged more.

Maybe if I ever get an EV, I'll go for one with a fake stick-shift just for fun. It depends on the cost.

Yes, I can still get RT by simply visiting its website. And so can everyone else in the West.

But what does "quantum yield" mean? The only number that really matters is energy in vs energy out. If it takes 1J of energy to produce fuel that yields 2J, then great. If it takes 2J to produce 1J, then not so great.

Who really says "we're coming for your children?" Oh right. The Jesuits.

Marketers and lobbyists will spin anything. If this tech turns out to be feasible, I think it's a good thing. We can still demand that the fossil fuel industry reduce its emissions at the same time as switching to net-zero energy sources.

Move to Saudi Arabia.