Comment No worries (Score -1, Flamebait) 793
It's funny, people would hire you because they think you're nice, while overlooking your patently awful legal opinions.
It's funny, people would hire you because they think you're nice, while overlooking your patently awful legal opinions.
"No doubt there will now have to be a third trial"
When you prove to be as wrong about this as you are about the vast majority of what you post, will you come back and admit you hav eno idea what the fuck you're talking about?
We don't need the admission, it's obvious, but it would be nice.
No actually, I'm laughing that your loser ass logged out to post that crap AC.
It means I won and you're my bitch.
"That's being more than a bit presuming and putting words into my mouth, wouldn't you say? "
No.
"Ah, so you have designated yourself a judge of who is and who isn't an enemy of freedom? "
No, he just voiced what we all saw.
"I apologize for having an extreme urge to shape new ideas into something tangible and workable. "
Shut the fuck up, thanks. You have no desire for that AT ALL, and lying about it is very pathetic.
You make worthless observations about form over substance, in a clear attempt to whore karma, while making NO ONE SINGLE VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION, then get pissy when yo uget called on it.
Fuck you buddy, you're everything he said you are.
You really have time to not only care about something so trivial, but actually write a post about it?
AFTER you write a post asking why people aren't being censored to your satisfaction?
Why haven't you killed your loser self yet?
"No, he's not. RTFA."
I did, you're wong and an idiot.
Shut up or kill yourself.
You said
"You seem to already have the negative caged-animal attitude that suing the shit out of everyone is your only option."
OP said
"Any thoughts from the Slashdot crowd?The free copies aren't boosting sales for my books. Do I (1) get another job, (2) sue people, or (3) invent some magic spell?"
So, the question is, are you just a REALLY bad reader, or are you that guy who has to lie because intelligent discourse is beyond his intellectual capability?
Slashdot, where outright lies are modded up because stupid fuckers don't bother to read.
You came HERE, to Slashdot, where there is consistent and irrefutable support for what have to be some of the dumbest ideas about copyright ever uttered, and you expect something useful?
Good luck, there's a very small population of people here with ideas you can use, but they'll be drowned out by the idiots who routinely denounce copyright as though it raped their baby and murdered their granny.
Tell me what you're looking for and I'll find it. Guaranteed.
Don't presume your own ignorance and lack of ability is indicative of the reality of the situation.
"Hint: it involves guns and courts and jails. "
No, actually, it doesn't, you're lying to support your "point"
It's no wonder though, that thieves have to resort to lies to support their thievery.
"You simply cannot make a freedom argument for copyright."
Funny he just did, you're lying again. And he didn't have to resort to "Hint: it involves changing the meaning of a word to support my stupidity, because logic fails to do so" like you did.
I'm going to let you in on a secret. The world isn't the echo chamber you live in on Slashdot, and outside of your stocked pond, your argument is routinely dissected and crushed, with the purveyors of that argument roundly ridiculed for their lack of intelligence.
"Nope. There are genre giants that end up making less than the waiter at the local Dennys."
Name some, then post facts to support your assertions.
I'll wait. A long fucking time though, since you're full of shit.
As in, good luck finding a situation where someone had their rights violated and NO ONE in America cares about it. If you think that's possible, you're an idiot.
The US is too diverse politically for that to ever happen.
As an aside, you're obviously seething with your inability to force the hand of the US government. It must piss you off intensely to know that not only do we not give a fuck what your farcical "world courts" think, but that you can't do a thing to change it.
Whine away, whiny whiner, whine away.
"So as long as instead of declaration of war the aggressor declares that it no longer recognized a nation, it's OK to shove everyone who resists into a death camp? "
Um, no. And nobody said anything about that but you.
Take you meds guy, seriously.
"Let's say there is some public corruption by a popular political figure. Should an organized group of partisan poll voters be able to spike the story just because they don't want to hear something bad?"
Where pedants fabricate stupid objections out of whole cloth in order to show the world how smart they think they are.
You, and the idiots who modded you up, need to be sterilized.
"Can we agree that not all "Social Network" ideas are worthwhile just because they happen to involve the Internet?"
I'll agree to that when you admit your obejction is moronic.
Deal?
"'My outrage is aimed at the scientist-charlatan putting society at risk using statistical methods. This is similar to global climate change"
Because relying heavily on statistical models is BAD for Wall Street, but GOOD for climate research, and clearly more useful and accurate when used that way.
Or maybe you should use some critical thinking skills and question some of your assumptions instead of frantically trying to conjure a refutation for my irrefutable observation.
It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do. -- Jerome Klapka Jerome