Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It comes as no suprise. (Score 2, Interesting) 101

And they also need to pay for:

6) Over half a million pounds for the National Codes Centre at Bletchley Park

http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/news/docview.rhtm/571874

An announcement from March 2009. The funding came via a government body called English Heritage whose remit is to fund historical monuments and heritage centres.

The story here is that the government refused to provide funding on the basis that they were already providing funding.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 2, Interesting) 101

Bletchley Park is not particularly neglected— they're canny fundraisers and this is a good way of drumming up some publicity.

As a Brit and a CS PhD student, you should definitely visit if you're passing near Milton Keynes. There is a museum there; I've been and it's a really great one. The article title is just plain misleading—what actually happened is that they weren't given the same national status as the Natural History Museum and the Science Museum.

More cash for them would of course be nice, but the evidence if you visit says they're not doing badly without it.

Comment It's a fine museum--visit if you're in the area! (Score 4, Interesting) 101

I visited the Bletchley Park museum last time I was in Milton Keynes on business. As you'll see from the link in the article, it's a fascinating site and an interesting collection, complete with reconstructions of the Bombe and Collossus. The place seems in pretty good shape and pretty well supported; lots of plaques announcing funding from big corporates (IBM, I seem to remember)—better funded, certainly, than a lot of museums.

It recently got a grant from English Heritage, the UK government agency responsible for supporting museums and sites of historical interest. This story is about it not getting a direct grant from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (but that's not how most of our museums are funded anyway).

Comment Re:Oh noes! - Grandma hates to compile apps (Score 1) 311

And the beauty is that you just described the complex way of doing it. If I'm no power user, I can just select "applications", "add/remove" and pick what I want.

Try doing that add/remove trick using what I believe in Windows is called the "control panel", and if I remember correctly it doesn't even give you a list of programs to install; you have to scrape around for something called an "exe". Will Windows ever be ready for the desktop?

PS. We seem to see a lot of these comments about the insurmountable difficulty of installing apps in Ubuntu. A subtle troll doing the rounds, surely.

Comment Re:Translation (Score 1) 291

Let's not forget the reason that "Never Gonna Give You Up" has been played so often on YouTube: people aren't marvelling at the music, they are being tricked into watching it as a newfangled alternative to sending them to a goat-related website. This is not a typical story about a typical songwriter--it should be seen rather in the context of goat-, cup- and girl-related internet phennomena.
Medicine

Saving 28,000 Lives a Year 263

The New Yorker is running a piece by Atul Gawande that starts by describing the everyday miracles that can be achieved in a modern medical intensive care unit, and ends by making a case for a simple and inexpensive way to save 28,000 lives per year in US ICUs, at a one-time cost of a few million dollars. This medical miracle is the checklist. Gawande details how modern medicine has spiraled into complexity beyond any person's ability to track — and nowhere more so than in the ICU. "A decade ago, Israeli scientists published a study in which engineers observed patient care in ICUs for twenty-four-hour stretches. They found that the average patient required a hundred and seventy-eight individual actions per day, ranging from administering a drug to suctioning the lungs, and every one of them posed risks. Remarkably, the nurses and doctors were observed to make an error in just one per cent of these actions — but that still amounted to an average of two errors a day with every patient. Intensive care succeeds only when we hold the odds of doing harm low enough for the odds of doing good to prevail. This is hard." The article goes on to profile a doctor named Peter Pronovost, who has extensively studied the ability of the simplest of complexity tamers — the checklist — to save lives in the ICU setting. Pronovost oversaw the introduction of checklists in the ICUs in hospitals across Michigan, and the result was a thousand lives saved in a year. That would translate to 28,000 per year if scaled nationwide, and Pronovost estimates the cost of doing that at $3 million.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

Working...