Does North Carolina have a law that requires a business which validates parking to disclose the amount of a person's bill used for that fee? Many business validate parking, and the parking is not owned by the business, which means the business pays some amount to the owner of the parking lot/ramp. People using public transportation or that walk to the business should be in anger!!!

Also, this law assumes the cost of the free charging is passed onto all patrons. Are they saying that a business would not be allowed to use its own profits towards free chargers unless it disclosed it???

It's not Zoom, so many fold better.

Helpful! I was very confused. Since there was no article I couldn't even RTFA

Easy to configure? GUI? Have you seen the insane powershell commands it takes to manage Microsoft solutions? Cisco, hate to say it Zoom, and other have FAR better management solutions via GUI. They have APIs as well, but nothing needing insane powershell knowledge.

I was wondering the same thing. I have not seen points in a long, long time. If they are limiting the trolls, they are also limiting those who up vote legit comments.

First they need to issue a statement to us Google Apps / G-Suite / Whatever we are called customers/users. So far the only information I have seen are the various reports noting that Google has sent info to the owners of said accounts.

I'm not sure about others, but I have received zero communications about this change from Google.

There is a way to do it, it just requires a 13 page powershell document to execute. The catch is, this is a cloud platform and users can't execute powershell on Microsoft's own services.

Must have been a Sinclair station

When XMarks was perfect and it was solid. You could have different profiles on a single account in order to sync different buckets to different computers. I could have personal bookmarks appear with my work ones on my work machine, but only personal bookmarks on the personal machines.

Worked across browsers, sync'd open tabs, sync'd history, etc. It was amazing...until it all got canned.

Temas is still Lync/S4B. If you look at the PowerShell commands/results you will see a ton of Lync/S4B processes and such.

He got a hold of Cisco TAC *and* got replacement equipment sent out? This is impossible with a valid contract. Hire him!

Except if you read the article its not doing anything other than banning "video calls" and keeping meetings to normal business hours. Something mgmt should be doing anyway.
 

Also, since when is a "Zoom" call video and an audio call is not? Can we stop the free marketing already? Let's call a pig a pig. Either it's "meeting free Fridays" or "no-video turned on meeting Fridays". By saying "Zoom free Friday" one thinks zero meetings.

Not sure the point of posting this now. I would have liked to know LAST Sunday about the week long final episodes, not after the fact....

We saw this during 2020 with Cisco's name labels and facial tracking on their devices. Worked pretty well during COVID, both for auto zooming and identifying the person to show their name.

https://blogs.cisco.com/collab...

In the US cops being afraid equates to feeling that their life is in danger. If a person runs towards a cop car with a baseball bat they will fear their life is in danger and use deadly force.

The problem we have in the US is cops use feelings vs actual credible threat.