Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:4 Years into the Future... (Score 1) 22

It's just an internal reorg, looks like, and my guess is they will continue to make Frostbite Labs develop the base engine and then a sports focused version of Frostbite for the Sports division and probably several game focused versions for the rest based on type of game.

I have gotten to play with Frostbite (probably 1, they're on 3 now) and I would hate to adapt that to anything but a shooter. It is what it was developed for, and very hard to tack on other forms of gameplay. My old boss owned a studio that EA bought and I almost went back to work for him. The killer was having to move to Silicon Valley and take a pay cut, meaning I was going to have an hour+ commute from someplace where I could afford to live (already did that once in my life, hard pass).

Comment Re:Not worried (Score 1) 224

If it's Ford, which has 7 managers at the same level, chaos dictates the requirements. Seriously, a company I used to work for called them the seven headed monster. We'd get seven sets of requirements and most of them contradicted the others. Fun times. I got laid off (along with everyone at my level), so go fuck yourselves! I wish you the worst of luck. Ford, sorry, I bought a car of yours - nothing against my former employer, it was the best car available at the time (2014).

Comment I don't blame Dish for trying (Score 3, Interesting) 29

Dish just doesn't have the Comcast clout for getting monopoly deals, but I can't blame them for not trying. Comcast has content to viewer deals in multiple markets and the FCC doesn't blink when they gouge everyone else to get their content, even though they promised not to gouge them. Ajit Pai broke the system to make massive amounts of money and Jessica Rosenworcel has done little to fix it since he was demoted. Sorry Jessica, want to see Net Neutrality again, but all I see is Comcast at 5x the going rate in my market and only obscure but coming on competition leveling the playing field (thank effing God for T-Mobile and Verizon 5g, their prices are going down - CenturyLink, shame at your 20 year old 7/1.5 - shame).

Comment Re:They shut down Three Mile Island (Score 2) 155

TMI reactor 2 only partially melted down, and it was operator error. Many still in operation nuclear reactors have a negative coefficient and can't melt down at all. Basically, if temperature goes up, reactivity goes down until the reactor shuts down.

Despite the wiki page giving mixed information, a lot of 4th gen reactors are both breeder reactors and have moderators.

Comment Re:Industry Propaganda (Score 1) 155

Lot of emissions, lol. Coal and natural gas I can assure you create FAR more emissions than uranium mining. Like FAR FAR FAR FUCKING FAR more emissions. When it comes to thorium mining, well, you like solar and wind? They depend on thorium mining, even if it is a waste product, and China dumps it in a landfill so it can seep into the water supply and they supply 95% of rare earths (used in solar and wind construction). Not saying conventional nuclear is good by any means, it has serious issues, especially expensive containment vessels not required by some new methods. Fast reactors that upgrade either nuclear waste (u238) to fissile plutonium or convert thorium to fissile uranium (u233) and burn that would make most of the fuel cycles are very efficient.

Did I just say we could build nuclear reactors that run on nuclear waste? Yes, I did. Less emissions than mining for wind and solar? Yep, for solar, nuclear is actually better, wind is about the same.

I'm not saying any one energy is better than any other, but they all have some carbon footprint. I was a big proponent of wind (which is tied for the lowest with nuclear) but it kills eagles in droves. The turbines have to be built in China, but the body and frame are built in the USA. 4G nuclear may well be the best option, where meltdown can't occur, but accidents are still possible.

Comment Re:A fire at a coal plant or a nuclear metldown (Score 1, Interesting) 155

The US required backup generators to be in a safe zone for like a dozen years if the plant was in an area that could get tsunamis for Fukushima type generators. Japan was building them, but they were too late for some of them. Japan is entirely at fault for what happened at Fukushima - they knew the reactors were vulnerable and delayed fixing the issue until it was too late.

Meanwhile, coal and natural gas plants spew out radiation every day and don't get anywhere near the scrutiny they deserve. You want rads? Live near coal and natural gas. I lived downwind from a coal plant for 20 years. If I get cancer, it is 99% likely it was due to coal.

Oh, so save the world with wind and solar? You depend on China to mine rare earth elements (95% are mined in China) and they dump radioactive elements into open air dumps that seep into the water system because they have no pollution control laws, which is why they are way cheaper than US mining (the US has lots of REE, but also restrictive pollution control laws). The generators need to be built in China because they require it to fuel their economy. Nuclear and wind power have about the same ratio of damage to the environment. Solar is, in fact, worse (slightly).

So yeah, nuclear has its issues, but so do coal, gas, wind, and hydro (didn't mention it yet, but has a horrible rate of deaths during construction). Geothermal is probably best, but has restrictive range. Also, geothermal is basically fission power, therefore nuclear.

All that said, 4th gen nuclear will almost universally burn near all its fuel (so yeah, nuclear waste is fuel), can't melt down (or is melted into a salt), be FAR more fuel efficient, be hopefully less a proliferation issue (but could be), and basically be far safer (passive safety is a requirement). There are some serious issues that need to be addressed, mostly due to corrosion, but a lot of the issues anti-nuclear activists push forward are addressed by 4th gen nuclear.

Comment Re:This is a weird question. (Score 1) 288

I had a B&W G3 from 1999 to 2016. I upgraded the CPU and ran up to OSX.3 or 4, then installed Yellow Dog Linux on it after Apple stopped supporting the PowerPC chip. It served as my Linux box and I ran old OSX in emulation to support a project for several years. Sadly, I couldn't afford to replace it and buy a gaming PC (in a box of parts), so it got relegated to being a backup server. That gaming PC is still running and is my current Linux backup server. For historic reasons, that mac was named Spooky and the one I had before it Creepy and both arrived around Halloween, thus my username.

Comment Re:trash (Score 1) 64

I don't think so - IBM drives were notorious for dying within 3 years, in fact, I had like 20 replaced under warranty (all backed up on tape), then they were ultra reliable. Seagate had a similar ebb and flow. Western Digital was the most reliable I've had, but had 2 fail after 10 years. I still don't trust Seagate due to people I know that have had major issues. Not blaming Seagate for being shit, I have like 3 friends that work for them, just people I know had issues. I have like 50 friends/acquaintances that work for Andersen windows and I think they sell a crap product (take that with a 30 years ago bias, no idea today).

Comment Re:And they are right. (Score 1) 211

Yes, I just had this discussion with my family. If it has a padlock in the upper left of your browser, it probably is secure. The problem is do you trust the trusted authorities? If I was the CIA, I'd put a man in the middle in every trusted authority to spy on every thing everyone sent. On one hand, I think everyone would know if the CIA ILLEGALLY did that (or FBI, given the CIA can't operate in the US), on the other, those f**king bastards can blow me. The real problem is the US has routed traffic to the UK and back to (il)legally spy on US packets because they came from a foreign nation. Sorry, US, that is treason by your own laws (which are wrong, but let's just go there - the Espionage Act of 1917 is totally broken).

Comment Re: Just that one aspect (Score 1) 220

There's no reason you can't write code to guarantee your smart pointer is always safe, though. That is, IMO, one of the failings of C++ - it CAN do a lot of things, but it feels like I have to build the libraries myself. Case in point - it took almost 30 years to add threads and I'm still waiting for a native thread pool library. Sure I can write my own (and have), but using pretty much any other programming languages, I get them out of the box. For f**k's sake, even that toy language python (sorry, great for small programs and scripting, but I just can't stand it for anything larger than 10ish or more pages of code) has thread pool support.

Comment Re:Is this like banning books? (Score 1) 122

lol, China "Communism" - Marx would die in open rebellion to overthrow it.

I have nothing against communism, my ancestors pretty much created it, but what they have/had in Russia, China, North Korea, etc. is hardly Marx's dream. Dictatorships are not what Marx intended. My ancestors were Mennonites, and God was their central belief... most Communists reject God, so, um ouch? I'm terrible at religion, personally, but the irony makes me laugh.

Slashdot Top Deals

The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman Augustine

Working...