Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

Officials Sue Couple Who Removed Their Lawn 819

Hugh Pickens writes "The LA Times reports that Orange County officials are locked in a legal battle with a couple accused of violating city ordinances for replacing the grass on their lawn with wood chips and drought-tolerant plants, reducing their water usage from 299,221 gallons in 2007 to 58,348 gallons in 2009. The dispute began two years ago, when Quan and Angelina Ha tore out the grass in their front yard. In drought-plagued Southern California, the couple said, the lush grass had been soaking up tens of thousands of gallons of water — and hundreds of dollars — each year. 'We've got a newborn, so we want to start worrying about her future,' said Quan Ha, an information technology manager for Kelley Blue Book. But city officials told the Has they were violating several city laws that require that 40% of residential yards to be landscaped predominantly with live plants. Last summer, the couple tried to appease the city by building a fence around the yard and planting drought-tolerant greenery — lavender, rosemary, horsetail, and pittosporum, among others. But according to the city, their landscaping still did not comply with city standards. At the end of January, the Has received a letter saying they had been charged with a misdemeanor violation and must appear in court. The couple could face a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine for their grass-free, eco-friendly landscaping scheme. 'It's just funny that we pay our taxes to the city and the city is now prosecuting us with our own money,' says Quan Ha."
PHP

Eight PHP IDEs Compared 206

snydeq writes "InfoWorld's Rick Grehen provides an in-depth comparative review of eight PHP IDEs: ActiveState's Komodo IDE, CodeLobster PHP Edition, Eclipse PHP Development Tools (PDT), MPSoftware's phpDesigner, NetBeans IDE for PHP, NuSphere's PhpED, WaterProof's PHPEdit, and Zend Studio. 'All of these PHP toolkits offer strong support for the other languages and environments (HTML, CSS, JavaScript, SQL database) that a PHP developer encounters. The key differences we discovered were in the tools they provide (HTML inspector, SQL management system) for various tasks, the quality of their documentation, and general ease-of-use,' Grehen writes.'"

Comment Re:yeah, but why humanoid robots in the first plac (Score 1) 214

A robot that would be use in any random setting or handling various chores would probably be best designed as a humanoid. The tools it would use while preforming the tasks are already designed for us to use. If I want to have a robot to do my chores, I'd rather not have to buy all new tools as well to enable it to do them. And even if I did get specialized accessories to enable the robot to work for me, How the hll am I going to use the lawn mover designed for the spider bot with 4 arms when it breaks?

Comment Wetware (Score 1) 262

Well, I suppose as long as it's a wire, I'm OK with it. I draw the line at wireless access though. I don't want anyone to be able to war-drive my frontal cortex.

Comment Re:eheee he heee he he. ..... he ... (Score 1) 283

Google doesn't give two shits about "empowering" anyone. They just realized that small websites were an untapped revenue source.

You are making 2 distinct statements. On the first, you seem to be wrong as evidenced by their actions. On the second, so what? Jealous much?

Comment Re:complete whats new and opinions (Score 1) 274

All those extensions are still the way someone else wanted, unless you wrote those extensions yourself. Did you?

The poster I was responding to didnt even know that these features existed in Opera. Of all things, he begins with a direct knock-off of an Opera feature. This feature, as you may not know, is capable of implementing most firefox extensions.

With your NoScript diatribe, I see that you havent actually investigated yourself either.

Comment Re:Better Reporting On The Way. (Score 2, Interesting) 57

Bloggers have their place. They're not journalists in the traditional sense, but they're not useless either. Bloggers can spread disinformation if they are careless or malicious. But most often than not, they also have a reputation to uphold, and for those catered to a more educated crowd, they have to do just as much work as any traditional journalist to ensure their stories are accurate.

Bloggers differ from journalists in that their articles are always opinionated. They offer a biased view of the world, which makes them more attractive to the people who share the same biases. This is why they're so specialized. There's no blog for "everything" (not even a place like Fark) because there's a whole lot of everything and bloggers can't catch up. But the intense specialization is the value of blogs. Instead of having journalists who do journalism very well write about technology, law, foreign affairs, recipies, parenthood, etc., specialists in each respective field write about their field, and often for other like-minded people.

Ideally, blogs fit into the space between traditional journalism and trade journals. But traditional journalism is so desperate to jump on the blog bandwagon they've started to lose themselves.

Comment Re:Typical! (Score 1) 176

From the description :"and either used or attempted to use Comcast service to use the Ares, BitTorrent, eDonkey, FastTrack or Gnutella P2P protocols at any time from April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008;" Well, I think their $16 million just blew up. Since bittorrent is a P2P service, I'm sure any one who used bittorrent AT ALL "attempted to use Comcast service" to download something.

Personally, I think they should have to pay $16 to all of us.

Comment Re:Office Space (Score 1) 970

Knowledge = Power
Power = Work/time
time=Money
Knowledge = Work/Money via Substitution Principle
(Knowledge)(Money) = Work via multiplying both sides by Money
Money = Work/Knowledge via dividing both sides by Knowledge

Thus, for a constant amount of Work, the less you know, the more you make

Comment Re:it's really bad (Score 1) 677

Proofs are pretty simple, but they can be long. Basically, for a proof, you start out with a set of axioms (things which are by definition true), and a pool of things like Laws, Theories, Postulates, and Lemmas. Those are basically well known results of combining the axioms above (sort of like open source black boxes, you feed it the right inputs, and out the other end comes the output). To do a proof, you start with your problem, and your toolkit from above. Then you go set by set, just like in school where you had to show your work. The difference is that for each set, you have to justify why something like (A + 5 = B) == (A = B - 5) by reference to the tools or something that you have in a previous step derived from the tools. The prood shows you how to get from point A to B and guarentees that you never go off the path while doing it.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...