They also claim they do not support non-Frontier-approved hardware, exposing their own bullshit.

See above.

Just like CenturyLink handed me a router when I started my service with them. I, then, handed it back and was not charged for it. I've done the same with Comcast, Sonic, and AT&T. Several times. Each. It's pretty simple, actually.

Alright, I've seen you say this a few times here and, well... They're not charging him $10/mo for access to their network; they're charging him $10/mo to lease a router... which he's not leasing. He pays a separate fee for access to their network and seems perfectly happy to abide by that particular rule. What you keep repeating applies to the fee not being discussed here, not to the one that is. In short, shut up and go away until you have something relevant to say.

They're actually gonna start selling Brawndo?

And if you like rules and policies forcing you to pay your lord and master for everything you do with a device you've already paid for, well, there's iPhone.

Two sides of the same coin, really.

Before the iShill pipes up again, I'll clarify: Yes, that includes the choice of the iPhone. It ain't for me, but I'll be damned if I don't support your ability to choose to give up your choice.

Well, right about the time they say "shit" there's a license.

And you realize how rare that is, in the grand scheme of things, right?

...

And how likely it is that the raw materials on those products all come from the same handful of companies as everything else...

A real, independent profitable retailerwho makes the products they sell? Or are those all made by the same 7 companies that make all the shit sold by the big chain stores?

It's almost as though you have no clue what the fuck you're talking about. You're thinking chargeoff, which is something entirely different. One is the result of you calling your credit card company and initiating the process of them pulling your money back out of the pocket of some company that is trying to rip you off; the other is the result of you not paying your bills.

He can't. He only reads headlines.

How many here swore up and down that the higher courts would end up ruling against Jarlstrom when I pointed out that he wasn't technically in violation of the law in question? And more than a handful of them questioned my (legally sound) logic...

Fast-forward to now and, not only did the court rule that he was not in violation of any law; they ruled that the law in question, as written, was unconstitutional and ordered that it be rewritten.

One day the lot of you will learn to listen when I'm not trolling -- and I do attempt to make it fairly obvious when I am, in fact trolling. Like right now. Go ahead, take the bait.

Hard to tell around here. All of my trolls have gone silent and I haven't noticed you around before, so my initial assumption was... well, you can see where this is going. My apologies if that is not the case.

Why not tell the idiot who posted it, and not the guy who was quoting him to explain how he was wrong?

That's because your SuperBeats have SuperBluetooth... SuperDre...