Comment Re:Direct link to the paper (Score 1) 392
In fact, this paper is just corroborating what other people have already proven in this Astrophysical Journal paper from 2005.
So yes, this is an interesting topic, but really the only plus on this paper was that they further refined the size of the black hole at the center of our galaxy (and of course they are assuming black holes exist).
Where is the revolutionary part of this paper? Anyone?
So yes, this is an interesting topic, but really the only plus on this paper was that they further refined the size of the black hole at the center of our galaxy (and of course they are assuming black holes exist).
Where is the revolutionary part of this paper? Anyone?