Ummm, no. Not sure how you get that I'm lying about anything when I commented factually about what YOU wrote and made no claims about the nature of what constitutes evidence. Also not sure what "personal evidence" means, but either scientific or legal evidence will certainly do it for me, I'm actually not that picky as long as it's independently and objectively verifiable. I will note that courts usually defer to the scientific evidence, so that works for me.
If I found my spouse in bed with someone else, that's pretty good evidence for me. If I tell you it happened and you don't know me, then it is not credible evidence for YOU and you may choose to believe it, but you have no factual basis for doing so. If you tell a third person about it, it is then anecdotal evidence only and cannot be considered to be a fact.
The question is, what is YOUR threshold for something to be called evidence? Based on what you asked people to Google, there is a biased low bar that finds information to support your beliefs that either may have other explanations or has sources that are questionable in their objectivity.
Try to be a skeptic - assume that it isn't true and prove otherwise - and you can argue with a clear conscience. But something tells me you are not interested in actual "evidence" of any kind other than what supports your beliefs.
