Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Media

What Does It Actually Cost To Publish a Scientific Paper? 166

ananyo writes "Nature has published an investigation into the real costs of publishing research after delving into the secretive, murky world of science publishing. Few publishers (open access or otherwise-including Nature Publishing Group) would reveal their profit margins, but they've pieced together a picture of how much it really costs to publish a paper by talking to analysts and insiders. Quoting from the piece: '"The costs of research publishing can be much lower than people think," agrees Peter Binfield, co-founder of one of the newest open-access journals, PeerJ, and formerly a publisher at PLoS. But publishers of subscription journals insist that such views are misguided — born of a failure to appreciate the value they add to the papers they publish, and to the research community as a whole. They say that their commercial operations are in fact quite efficient, so that if a switch to open-access publishing led scientists to drive down fees by choosing cheaper journals, it would undermine important values such as editorial quality.' There's also a comment piece by three open access advocates setting out what they think needs to happen next to push forward the movement as well as a piece arguing that 'Objections to the Creative Commons attribution license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible.'"
The Almighty Buck

The Man Who Sold Shares of Himself 215

RougeFemme writes "This is a fascinating story about a man who sold shares in himself, primarily to fund his start-up ideas. He ran into the same issues that companies run into when taking on corporate funding — except that in his case, the decisions made by his shareholders bled over into his personal life. This incuded his relationship with his now ex-girlfriend, who became a shareholder activist over the issue of whether or not he should have a vasectomy. The experiment continues." The perils of selling yourself to your friends.

Comment Re:Cost addition for multiplayer is not that much (Score 2) 271

Doesn't Blizzard go to great lengths to ensure competitive balance between the three races? I would imagine that a substantial portion of the time and money invested in multi-player goes toward balance-testing and re-calibration; balancing single-player only seems inherently less complicated.

Comment Re:Food-as-fuel (Score 1) 558

In an idea world, I would agree. But WE are not in control; corporations are. These corporations have since the late 1970's tried to fight this fuel change, and only now that peak oil is approaching are they beginning to act. Remember, oil is more than fuel, and fuel does more than transport people. Lacking sufficient fuel, virtually all major nations would lose their ability to produce goods and services, and eventually even the basic necessities in the fashion that we have them now. Yes, it would be nice if we could ship food to all of the worlds hungry, but if we don't find an alternate fuel source, we won't have the capacity to ship that food to the airplane, the fuel to run the airplane, or even the capacity to grow enough food for us and them. If this were 1979, I would be right with you, but its not. The problem was there 25 years ago and we did next to nothing. Now, we cannot have a solution that requires more than 10-15 years. It just isn't feasible.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...