You don't understand, the systemic racism left Rep. Bowman too traumatized to recognize a brightly colored red fire alarm lever. He thought he was pressing the repatriations button instead. It is a common and understandable mistake.

Try again, but with less straw...

For example, Biden's justice department manufacturing novel legal theories [nytimes.com] to imprison non-violent political protesters...

This is not a valid argument of EV economic feasibility. Additionally, your reflexive urge to spend other people's money is hilarious.

They do not.

But not in a way you think.

There is almost zero chance of that happening, as attempting to arrest sitting head of state of Russia would likely trigger nuclear exchange. So Hauge for Putin would require a regime change in Russia, and not the violent kind where the losing side gets all killed. As such, Putin will likely end up like Stalin - poisoned and dying on a carpet in his own piss than tried in the international courts.

While we can recognize evil of Putin's regime when it engages in totalitarian crackdowns on free speech, the sad truth is that we are not far behind. For example, Biden's justice department manufacturing novel legal theories to imprison non-violent political protesters while ignoring similar cases elsewhere.

If we look at the electricity costs alone, why are you so certain it will remain low when generation is down, regulatory costs are up, and demand is up?

That aside, maintenance costs of EVs are proven to be higher than ICE. The promise of simpler electric cars did not materialize, EVs on the road today are differently complex than ICEs only the technology is newer. So no, it is not clear to me that EVs will be cheaper to run on individual or fleet scale.

Any "study" claiming that they can predict long-term impacts of climate change is speculative at best. Not only such studies in normal circumstances are highly unreliable, doubly so for the long-term forecasts. Now compound that uncertainty with model-based climate predictions and all that is left is uncertainty.

TL;DR Long term GDP forecast studies are BS, doubly so when attempting to account for climate change.

This drastically lowers the bar on pen testing (and hacking). The result will likely be less useful CVE descriptions.

There are war crimes committed by IDF that cannot be explained by blaming Hamas. For example, blocking aid to cause famine.

That aside, the fact that Hamas committing war crimes is clear and indisputable. Insofar as Hamas causing civilian deaths, I hold IDF largely blameless. This is not the entirety of the picture, as there are situations and circumstances that cannot be explained by blaming Hamas.

The opt out is a giant red button labeled "Fuck off, Microsoft, you useless sacks of shit".

Are there any circumstances when a genocide is justified? Even if we agree that Hamas attempted genocide against Israeli, would retaliatory in-kind response be justified?

You should question your sanity if the first explanation you come up for disagreement is that your opposition is being paid by terrorists. I don't think you are sufficiently insane to believe what you posting here, so stop intentionally and knowingly shitposting.

Go back and re-read your own posts. This is what your posts communicate to the reader.