Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Journal: Democracy

[img]http://www.anus.com/etc/dimebag/democracy.jpg[/img]

These were all Democratic decisions.

1. [url=http://www.gensuikin.org/english/photo.html]Hiroshima and Nagasaki[/url]

2. [url=http://archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-75-1390/science_technology/great_lakes_pollution/]Pollution of the Great Lakes[/url]

3. [url=http://www.zmag.org/ZMag/articles/apr01bilezikyan.htm]Extermination of Buffalo[/url]

4. [url=http://www.waco93.com/]Massacre of Branch Davidians in Waco, TX[/url]

5. [url=http://www.scs.k12.tn.us/STT99_WQ/STT99/Houston_HS/rugell/webquestltr.htm]Frog deformities from pollution[/url]

6. [url=http://www.boer.co.za/boerwar/hellkamp.htm]Concentration Camps invented by the British[/url]

7. [url=http://www.beograd.org.yu/cms/view.php?id=201271]NATO bombing of Belgrade, YU[/url]

8. [url=http://www.beograd.org.yu/cms/view.php?id=201271]Echelon[/url]

9. [url=http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Apr05/Sanders0401.htm]Starving Iraqi Children[/url]

10. [url=http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0810564.html]Reconstruction[/url]

It's not just America that's the problem.
[b]It's democracy.[/b]
User Journal

Journal Journal: How to have peace

How to Have Peace, Finally

1. End Envy. When everyone in society competes for money alone, envy and resentment run high and so does sleight of hand behavior. Let's stop the rat race. In a healthy culture, every job is important and given its place, and no one is left to rot at the bottom of the competitive heap except blatant incompetents.

2. Reduce pollution and urban blight. We're all scrabbling toward the top of the pile so we don't get left in a ghetto. But running away to the suburbs no longer protects us from deranged urban dwellers. A solution is to fix our cities and o put some people in jail for life if all they do is destroy things.

3. Kick our oil dependency. Oil is our heroin, our crack, our meth. We need a certain amount of it to run our economy. But do we really need individual cars, especially since they don't help us outrun the mess of the city? Do we really need all of these products? We can do just as well with less, and in fact be happier.

4. Support diversity. To have diversity, you need to have distinct ethnic groups. If you try to combine these groups, they'll fight for their own right to exist as a group and cause the ethnic warfare common to multicultural society. Let the ethnic groups separate and stop viewing such separation as a taboo "racism."

5. Don't try to hide different abilities. Billy is a genius, but Mary is a world-class athlete. We get embarrassed for both of these kids because they can't do something the other can. Let's end that charade. We're all different and we each have a place in the world. We don't need to be "equal" to be OK, and trying to force "equality" causes mayhem.

6. Allow people to live according to chosen values, even if they seem grotesque to us. In the west, our newspapers tell us that Muslims are primitive, women-abusing, tribal societies. But there is no science or philosophy that tells us reliability that such lifestyles are "bad." Tolerate difference.

7. Stop the war on drugs. Some people are gonna take 'em, and some are gonna drink to excess. Just keep them away from the kids and when they're observed screwing up on the job, fire them. We cannot afford the violence and police militarization of the war on drugs.

8. Forget the war between the sexes. If being equal means we gotta fight and have the 50% chance of divorce for every marriage we have, forget it. Let's respect each other for what we are and try to get along with more respect. "Equality" might be an illusory goal, since we've each got different equipment, inside and out, but respect and compassion are eternal.

9. Reverence. We're so busy chasing the holy dollar we've forgotten what it is to love life. Ancient monks in secluded monasteries saw intense concentration on tasks and appreciation of life as a form of prayer. Maybe this kind of soul stillness and inner beauty is missing in our lives, and we need to bring it back.

10. Open-mindedness. "Tolerance" implies not liking something, but putting up with it. Instead, we should try to understand that we each have different paths, and there is no ordained single route to glory. There are some things that are a good idea for everyone, but you have to do it for yourself. Be open-minded in the original meaning -- we know the goal, but there's more than one way to get there.

This message brought to you by AAAWL:
http://www.corrupt.org/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Gnosticism

When people talk about perfection, they often fall into the trap of assuming a linear world: a place like the mythical Heaven where there is no bad, only good, and good of the purest sense. While as symbol that sounds appealing, when one goes through the process of plotting out life, it sounds terrible, because it would rapidly lead to repetition. If there's one right answer to every question, and every activity turns out excellently, is there any enough contrast to claim one has actually had an experience? Without danger, adventures would become tourist play; without the possibility of failure, success would have no greatness. Without death, there would be no reason to make one decision over another in life, as all experiences would be exactly equal thanks to infinite days and thus zero consequences. Screw up your life? Live another lifetime, within your lifetime. Boundaries give meaning to what lies within them, in other words.

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/perfect/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Smash Democracy!

Finding the right answer for a whole system - people, earth and culture - is difficult. Democracy sidesteps that question and functions by selecting the most popular option, promoting alongside it a social order of the same. If many (but not necessarily most) people like something, it must be good, regardless of its consequences. Suppose a product is garbage, a leader is criminal-minded, or a social group psychotic? As long as the product, person or group is popular, these questions are never raised. Democracy is insanity, and therefore we must smash democracy!

http://www.anus.com/tribes/ada/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Macintosh

Apple Computer, Inc. was pleased to announced today that with the arrival of two recent worms for the Bluetooth wireless networks on its effete line of compers, the Macintosh, the company has claimed the spotlight previously possessed by larger corporation Microsoft. Known for years as the company with 2% market share that received no viruses because it was easier to find a gay Baptist than a Mac user, Apple feels it has "hit the big time" and the quality of these worms proves it.

"While this particular worm is not fully functional, the source code could be easily modified by a future attacker to do damage," said Vincent Weafer, security director at Symantec anti-virus software labs. Nonetheless, industry observers consider it proof of Apple's ongoing successes, even if it is rumored that the virus writers thought they were hacking an iPod, not a Mac.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/02/21/apple.worm.reut/index.html
User Journal

Journal Journal: Hostage (To Morons)

Hostage (To Morons)

The saving grace of philosophy or politics is putting it into practice. Conversely, the reason for the existence of abstract thought arises from the necessity of finding better organization schema for our real world lives. Ideas affect how well things turn out; a poor design works less than a good one. When a modern philosopher ventures out into the world, he or she is going to immediately realize that those who think, in this society, are hostage to those who do not.

We are literally held hostage by morons. It is not in such a dramatic way as might occur in a bank robbery or hijacking, but it is nonetheless a powerful regulator of our lives. We are not held at gunpoint, or confined to small cages, or suspended in terror by someone next to us wearing a bomb, but instead of having one powerful event of control, we are subjected to infinite thousands of daily events which show us how our lives are controlled by morons. We are held hostage because since their behavior is always of the lowest, simplest, stupidest possible variety, all of society must be changed to accomodate them.

Imagine a philosopher driving to the post office. First, he must wait while at the head of a long line of cars, a moron slowly attempts a turn. Where a smart person would brake gently and then pull through the turn, the moron brings his car almost to a complete stop and then, without a hurry in the world, slowly completes the turn. It's not rocket science, but you wouldn't know by watching him! Since everyone has more to do than they have hours in the day, and are constantly in a hurry to steal as much of their time back from society for themselves, people become immediately frustrated as the moron's slow turn causes each car behind him to in sequence brake, bringing the line to a complete stop by the third vehicle. They whip out of the lane in clumps, causing cars in every other lane to hit the brakes as the traffic pattern becomes unpredictable. We all wait for the moron. We all wait for the traffic damage the moron has wrought. We all arrive later after having been in more danger of a wreck than is necessary. But remember: you should be tolerant of morons, because they don't directly cost you anything - or so it is said.

At the next light, the philosopher waits for morons to drive slowly through the intersection. They are delayed by distraction, since things like power windows and staying within the lines of their lane and listening to the radio are big, complicated adventures for them. So where twenty cars could get through a light, fifteen do; the backup grows over the course of the day and eventually spills over to nearby roads, delaying other people further. Everyone loses because we tolerate morons. As the philosopher drives up to the intersection, a legless man in a wheelchair crosses the intersection against the light, and delays the fat person eating a burger who is ahead of the philosopher; the light changes to yellow, and the philosopher must stand on his brakes to avoid running a light he can barely see ahead of the van.

Finally, at his destination, the philosopher gets to wait in line because a moron ahead of him cannot figure out a simple form. In fact, everyone waits. While the moron at the front of the line delays everyone by an unnecessary ten minutes, others compensate: they take out cell phones, start filling out other forms, or space out. This means that each time a new person comes to the start of the line, they have to return to the real world. This adds delays across the board. A moron would say, "So what, it's just time?" but three of these a day subtracts a half-hour which means eight full days out of the year are spent unnecessarily waiting in line - the figure for waiting in line is much higher. Even more it means that any line becomes a downright unpleasant experience, since it is obviously bungled but no one "can" do anything about it as morons might be offended, and they mightily wail when they're upset.

(It's fair to note that the word "moron" here is technically inaccurate. There is a form of intelligence that IQ tests don't measure which has to do with the ability of an individual to see a situation as whole and act realistically. It's impossible to test that with a standardized form, because it is the exact antithesis, but modern society is based on standardized tests. Morons can be functionally intelligent but they lack the capacity for wisdom, for reverence of the finer moments in life, for romanticizing life itself... morons are spiritually dead, but will always insist on their own importance out of a combination of fear and anger that others might be getting more than they are. There may be no good/evil axis in the world, but surely no matter how tolerant we are, we can realize that there is an axis of stupid and wherever it is given power, things get stupid?)

Morons steal even more time when the line-wait is over with. Did you want the product that did the job better than others, but cost 15% more? You'll be denied; the morons demanded cheaper, not better, and so your voice is drowned out. You cannot elect a candidate who represents you because he will be feared to be "elitist" by the morons, and even if such a candidate could run, some moron would run and promise impossible but good-sounding things and be elected anyone. Democracy is triumph of the moron because by its nature, intelligence is a rare and beautiful thing. So your government, which is run by morons, also holds you hostage.

Even worse, you're subjected to any number of processes designed for morons. Cops approach everything as a crime in progress because with morons, it is. Psychologists assume you have toilet training and breast feeding psychoses since morons do and morons, making up 90% of their paying customers, are more important than smart people. Paying taxes or doing anything official is difficult because it has been dumbed down; instead of giving you access to your own future, they make all of us jump through many hoops because morons cannot understand the raw actions they need to take, and will screw up anything they're given. Morons are holding your time - the one measure of your life, your mortality and your potential - hostage.

This situation has come about because we have taken our eyes off the task of survival, and have instead become fascinated by the physical method of survival, which is the individual. Society will live on if an individual dies, but this threatens that individual, so instead of concerning ourselves with society's survival, we idealize the individual and focus on that, to the point where we're running society as a whole into the ground. And it's too late to protest, because you'll offend morons and thus not only go broke when that 90% of your customers ignore you, but also will be arrested for some or another "moral violation" in daring to tell the truth. Morons rule through enforcement of individualism.

The disease of modernity makes illogicality into a supreme goal through this mechanism, and replaces any thought of having a better society with an obsession with the individual. All of our "progressive" ideas have to do with making life better, fairer or easier for the individual, usually through "equality" and "freedom," mythical concepts that sound good in speeches and are therefore optimal for manipulating morons. But by pursuing these ideas, we guarantee the individual has a place even where it is illogical to give one, which explains why we illogically allow morons to define our agenda and methods. Morons, however, are defined by what they don't understand more than what they do. It is for this reason that they insist on individualism, forgetting that by forcing people to be treated identically, we remove what little chances they had for real distinction as individuals. Morons don't notice, and morons don't care, but we remain their hostages.

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/hostage/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Future of Metal

Future of Metal

We write about this often for the simple reason that now metal is stagnant. The past is written; it is a codex of riff forms, song structures, vocal/guitar techniques, and drum patterns that can be easily recombined to make a song or album. The aesthetics of ideal are well defined in a collection of imagery and concepts that can be twisted into a list in which order and flavor - specifics - are made to order. In other words, we are in the age of permutation of known ideas and a lack of actual creation of distinctive, relevant statements.

I do not believe in history as a linear progression from ignorance to a higher state. It seems to me that was is true is eternal; it will apply in any age, no matter how many people there are or what technology we have. Regardless of location, political system, wealth or degree of interconnectedness via the (fucking) internet, that which is true is that which is adapted to the methods of the universe and thus raises those who wield it to a higher level. That which is eternally less intelligent will always lower those who use it.

This is a way of seeing natural selection as a dramatic contrast to social history; things get better or worse according to adaptation to the world, not to the social order of the time. While great art may comment on the situation at hand, it does so in order to speak of these eternal truths through the metaphor of the time, because what is true cannot be written down in a form that will survive the aeons. It must be rediscovered, constantly, much as individuals must recreate their own inspiration toward survival if they wish to rise above the eat-sleep-fornicate-buy-things method of subsistence.

In metal, as in life, natural selection is prevalent; some art is simply better than other art. It is not an absolute category, where some join the canon of eternals, but if we compare two albums independent of stylistic concerns, we will find that in different traits one is better than the other and vice versa; when we collect these traits, we can see that one is more effective as art - touching the eternal in us, the sense of striving that gives life meaning - than the other. Those who are more adapted see this as natural and powerful, where those who fear they are less adapted correspondingly fear this judgment, and wish us to see all art as unique and equally valid, because only under that judgmentless veil are they able to feel confident about themselves.

Metal music is currently nearing forty years of age, and has gone through a number of generations, and with the culmination of death and black metal, has reached a musical maturity of being distinct from rock music, hardcore punk, and the other genres surrounding it. One might think, if one believes in linear history, that this is the end of its growth; not so - this is merely the end of its aesthetic, or in the realm of external appearance, growth. What defines coming metal is its internal factors, meaning that regardless of aesthetic, its composition and beyond musical factors, its artistry - how well does it connect us to the eternal process of striving and finding meaning in life. This process of discovering meaning cannot be polarized into praising the good, or describing the bad, but is an acceptance of both good and bad as part of an ongoing process similar to natural selection in which art is an agent for greater clarity.

However, for metal to rebirth itself, it must escape the current constraints of its stylistic uniformity (despite many "unique" variations, the essentials are similar and are in fact drifting closer to the rock ideal) and find in style a voice for these emotions. This requires us to surpass that which makes metal so easy to clone so that it can take the next step in its own evolution and become more articulate, more aware, and more insightful to the process of living. This will not happen through a further descent into the simplistic three-chord bashing that no matter how dressed up with complicated drum patterns, new vocal styles, flutes, etc. will achieve nothing more than a descent to a lower level of adaptation and thought, namely rock music. Metal must break its stylistic surface tension and "go under," that is to same lose all belief in past ways of doing things so that it can re-evaluate them. When we say "re-evaluate" we do not mean discard and replace with trendier and "unique" versions of the same old rock aesthetic and ideal, but rediscover those ideals that are inherent to metal.

Let us look at its growth through history.

Metal music arose from a ferment of proto-punk and progressive elements clustered in the death of rock music as an extension of blues, itself an extension of Celtic and Germanic folk music ("country" in USA) to which was added the constant syncopated percussion favored by waltz and pop bands in beerhalls. Americans repackaged this as first blues, then jazz, and finally rock music in an attempt to convince us that linear history had produced a new form of music; to speak correctly, it produced a new aesthetic and a resimplified genre that, having an easily grasped standard form and standard, easily-moved harmony afforded by pentatonics, could be draped in a new aesthetic and therefore churned out like a product. Same internal aspects, new external ones, a spiffy new name and something different in the vocals or use of flute, and it can be sold all over again even though it offers nothing new as an artistic process. In this, rock music was a degradation of existing art forms to product status, and is exactly what one would expect from industrial society on the eve of widely-available radio (1930s) and vinyl-pressing (1940s) technology.

I.

The earliest rock music spent its years attempting to define itself as separate from the blues; its most celebrated members, the Beatles, introduced a fugue-like style of composition and a more flexible view of key that allowed it to escape the paint-by-numbers approach of blues and early rock. This defined and ended the first generation of rock, meaning that starting in the middle 1960s rock music was inspired to new dimensions. The first offshoot of this was the instrumentalist movement in England, which made a more technical and musically literate form of the blues, and the second was progressive rock, which attempted to infuse classical music and jazz percussion into rock music. By the time 1969 rolled around, these movements were well-established enough to produce a counter-reaction in the form of the first proto-punk (MC5, Link Wray, Iggy Pop, Blue Cheer) and proto-metal (Black Sabbath) bands, as well as an offshoot of progressive rock that hid its technicality in favor of a storytelling epic grandeur in music that was outwardly simple but artistically complex (Led Zeppelin). From this ferment, metal was born, and it it should be recognized that the first signs of its birth were the acerbic distorted guitar stylings of King Crimson and the detuned droning boom of Black Sabbath; it cannot be underemphasized how Led Zeppelin, despite being similar to proto-metal, belongs to the progressive rock canon alongside Jethro Tull and other "loud" bands, but aesthetically and musically influenced the metal to come.

II.

Not surprisingly, metal music found its first home in England. There was first a confusion of the new style with the old, as seen in later Black Sabbath, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple and the increasing use of distortion in progressive and technical blues bands. This spurred the birth of a "New Wave of British Heavy Metal," who from roughly 1972 to 1978 produced the greatest bands of the classic heavy metal era, including Angel Witch, Blitzkrieg, Budgie, Iron Maiden and Judas Priest. These bands often named themselves through an inverted duality, like Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath did, taking a known light/positive concept and modifying it with a sense of heaviness or evil. The suggestion in that type of name is that not all which claims it is good and light will turn out so; there is an implication that underneath the veneer of society, something disturbed lurked, and this was possibly best expressed in Black Sabbath's "War Pigs," in which the tendency of society to fight ideological wars for "good" resulted in young men who could not buy their way out of service being sent off to fight for the benefits of the economy, with Satan laughing and spreading his wings, as if his great deception was that not all labelled as good is in fact not evil. Early heavy metal found a fascination with the occult, the undercover, and that which was outside of normal bourgeois or even urban poor lifestyles, including drugs, motorcycles, bar fights, Satan and a "gypsy" mode of living. It was subversion of society by pointing out the unnoticed in which life thrived, outside of the rigid definitions of a mechnical and moralistic society, and this was echoed in visual art and literature by the postmodernists.

III.

To a bored generation tired of the simplistic solutions of hippies, and also afraid of the staid world of function to which their parents in terror of being destitute and at the mercy of society cleaved, this was a breath of fresh air. During this era, heavy metal gained its peak of popularity and was gradually coopted into a hybrid of NWOBHM and stadium rock, the ballad-heavy and strikingly visual style of emotional and individualistic rock music designed to please a mass audience. During the early 1980s, this exploded into form with a metal/hard rock hybrid in England and America, with bands like Rush, Quiet Riot, Def Leppard, Van Halen and even louder commercial pop like The Cars and INXS. At this point, the desire for acceptance that early heavy metal bands had desired was satisfied, but at the price of seeing metal reintroduce rock music aesthetics and ideals inside of itself. One counterweight to this tendency was the "neoclassical" movement in heavy metal lead guitar, which used classical technique and often themes from great classical pieces to highlight a higher ambition than that of its stadium-bound colleagues. While it is impossible to avoid mentioning Yngwie Malmsteen in this context, it is equally silly to disregard the allusions to this tendency in Judas Priest, Deep Purple and other classic metal bands. Neoclassical metal was a natural direction for the most adventurous metal bands to follow.

Reactions to stadium rock-metal were forthcoming; first, punk music exploded with the aid of the ragged sound of heavy metal and songs that were "nihilistic" because they unabashedly used simple musical devices and had no pretentions, artistic or otherwise, toward hiding their mechanism. Punks saw progressive rock as decoration, and when heavy metal sold out, wanted to make a form of art to preserve the spirit of insurgency against a rotted social fabric that they had observed in the best of the early rock and metal bands. Punk itself went from a proto-punk form to punk hardcore, and immediately sold out into what is disparagingly called "punk rock," or simple rock songs restated in power chords and punk rhythms. Naturally, the newer generations of metal bands sought to hybridize the parts of this energy they saw as useful; they were enamored of the simple effectiveness of punk, but disliked much of its anti-artistry, which they saw as crushing imagination at the expense of politics and social activism. The first ventures into this line of thought also came from England, in the form of Motorhead (1976) and Venom (1978), who made stripped-down heavy metal with the bouncy simple riffs of punk bands; these bands were also luridly enamored of after-dark culture (Motorhead) and the occult (Venom), although in an artistic and not dogmatic sense.

IV.

As this style dawned in the early 1980s, it left England entirely and became a phenomenon divided between the United States and continental Europe, and here is where metal's maturation began in earnest. In the USA, two movements formed roughly simultaneously; thrash, or metal riffs in superfast punk song structures, and speed metal, or punk-influenced heavy metal with startlingly progressive song structures. Thrash bands like Dirty Rotten Imbeciles (DRI), Corrosion of Conformity (COC), Cryptic Slaughter, Fearless Iranians From Hell, MDC (an omnireferential acronym) and dead horse startled the world with short, often under twenty seconds, songs and abrasive condemnation of modern society as soulless and whorelike in its pursuit of money. In this they extended the ideals of punk, but to them they gave a sense of the non-literality of metal, a desier to create a mythology of life outside of the norm. Speed metal bands, most notably Metallica, Nuclear Assault, Exodus, Testament and Prong, forged ahead with a more explicitly mythological worldview but infused into it a punk distrust of society's motivations that stretched back to "War Pigs" in its fusion of occult, technological and moral theory. Speed metal borrowed much of its song structuring from progressive rock, not leaving verse-chorus patterning behind, but augmenting it with introductory riffs, interludes, and songs that used more than one pair of complementary motifs before returning to a fundamental theme (Metallica's "Orion" and "Call of Kthulu" are the best examples). Thrash died in almost the time frame of its blurfast songs, and speed metal lingered until 1989 before following its forefathers into the cold still death of being absorbed by mainstream stadium rock ("One" by Metallica is as explicitly stadium rock as Def Leppard's "Photograph," but of a higher aesthetic and conceptual quality).

V.

Europe at the time may have been a more cynical place, in part because while America was threatened by Soviet missiles, Europe was threatened by not only nuclear war but the threat of a second Soviet invasion. To those who did not endure the Cold War, it is hard to describe, but it was a competition of mythos: the evil Soviets bearing down on free will with conformity and a ruthless ideology versus the decadent Americans promising "freedom" and delivering wage slavery (as it turned out, both sides were correct in their assessment of the other). This paranoia fueled the literalism of American thrash bands, but in Europe, it evoked a highly symbolic interpretation of heavy metal that became the basis for all metal to come: the rise of proto-death/black metal with Hellhammer, Sodom and Bathory. It is appropriate to point out how this music was fueled by its origins, namely hardcore punk of the ambient style from Discharge, who produced their seminal work in 1982 ("Hear Nothing, See Nothing, Say Nothing") and a heritage of NWOBHM including its partial generation in Motorhead and Venom. The new music used the epic riff stylings of metal, aiming for a sense of grandeur and world-weighty topical conclusion as found in opera and classical music, but had the energy of punk and many of its techniques, but it went further: like speed metal, it used song structures adapted to the content of each song, or a collection of riffs that narrated a developing theme. This can be seen most clearly in the ten-minute "Triumph of Death" from Hellhammer, which cycles through several complementary patterns of riffing, often returning to theme but never lapsing entirely into verse/chorus structure, where speed metal bands inevitably did. Also introduced was a rasping vocal, equally influenced by Motorhead and punk hardcore bands like The Exploited, that gave an ethereal and sinister sound to the music.

It is worth mentioning that with the rise of death and black metal in prototypical form, the "underground" was born: a parallel society of fans, labels, magazines ("zines") and venues that supported a style of music that would have been offensive to the ears of most listeners. In the 1980s, the technological futurism of the 1970s merged with a desire for a clear-cut ideological division of the world into a culture that favored only cleanly defined objects and ideas; the sound of 1980s mainstream music was techno-savvy keyboards, discrete percussion, crisp vocals and a lack of noise. Like punk before it, 1980s underground metal was a stab in the face of this: distorted, embracing forbidden underworld topics like the occult and life outside of the working world and bourgeois lifestyle, and contra-moral in its embrace of death in both giving and taking. In fact, one of its primal statements was literally "The Triumph of Death": no matter how much we hide behind social constructs, like money or popularity, we must face our mortality and this more than anything defines our lives - although, it seemed, the mainstream was obsessed in denying and obscuring this eventuality. At this point, bands also aspired outwardly toward classical music in structure and aesthetics, with Bathory's Quorthon listing Wagner as one of his primal influences.

VI.

The middle 1980s showed a flowering of this style into death metal, the more rhythmic interpretation of the new concept, and it occurred at first in the Americas. A speed metal band named Slayer became massively popular by using the new style of riff and song construction, but keeping the shouted vocals of speed metal; in the same part of California, two years later, one of the first death metal bands, Possessed, cut their definitive first album. Similarly, Deathstrike/Master in Chicago were forging ahead with their punkish death metal, and in Brazil, Sepultura had already made microsymphonies of simple riffs in complex ordering schema. By 1989, death metal was well defined, but remained off the radar of the average fan because its albums were for the most part sold in specialty record shops and were not reported on in the mainstream press. At this point, the term "underground" gained currency, much as it had with punk and indie rock before, denoting both a separate marketplace and attitude than that of mainstream rock. Morbid Angel, Deicide, Massacra, Asphyx and Death were releasing albums at this point; they were followed by those who proliferated the style, such as Suffocation, Immolation, Incantation, Morgoth and Nihilist. By 1991, death metal was in full maturity, and perhaps reached its peak with Morbid Angel's "Blessed Are the Sick" and Deicide's "Legion." The underground began to attract mainstream attention as these albums sold over 100,000 copies.

VII.

Like all things, death metal grew, then became bloated, and then obsoleted itself as imitators flooded the genre. Its strength was its structuralist composition: riffs fit together in a narrative style that was specifically adapted to the content of the song, meaning how it translated real-world experience into music; this was in contrast to rock music, which used an exclusively cyclic structure whose goal was to maintain a constant state of high emotional arousal. Death metal did not have a consistent emotion, and to most listeners seemed dangerous in its ambiguous attitudes: experienced was not described and then wrapped up into a handy conclusion, but left in its raw form, including its dangers which were, like mortality itself, inaddressable. It did not offer suggestions that love was eternal and would overcome death, or that emotion was more powerful than the real world. It emphasized the terrifying nature of reality as a balance between death and life, and cast aside individualistic morality for a look at situations as a whole; where individualistic morality makes statements such as that killing is wrong, that is an artifact of its focus on the individual as its primary element; death metal used a holistic morality that looked at the whole of the situation and saw incidental deaths as inconsequential in comparison. Death metal was "nihilistic" in that not only did it refuse to dress up its motivic material as was done in rock music (shades of punk hardcore), but that it accepted that our lives are meaningless except to ourselves and that the only meaning was as found in nature, a process of natural selection and survival. It was explicitly anti-Christian and anti-Capitalist in this regard, although death metal bands were not opposed to making money (in philosophical terms, capitalism is a system where the most important aspect of society is the accumulation of wealth; one can support earning a good living without thinking money is more important than culture, morality or art). Death metal bands wrote about disease, death, the occult and mutilation with verve; underlying these graphic images was a re-centering of life, a discovery that no matter how we categorized things as "good" or "evil," life itself was our goal and life was transacted not in morality but in actions: structural change, genetic change, mystical and mythological conceptions beyond the discrete binary categories of individualistic materialism. As such, death metal was the last great subversive genre to emerge from the 1980s and perhaps its most insightful.

When the 1990s dawned, change occurred in the world. Conservative leaders in Europe and America were supplanted by liberal ones as the cold war ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union and its associated Communist substates. Metal forked again: while death metal continued to grow, its shadow genre grindcore - death metal restated through a punk ethos - bloomed, as did "industrial grindcore" and industrial-metal hybrids like Godflesh and Fear Factory; simultaneously, surprising everyone, the melodic offshoot of proto-death/black metal rose, this time called by a name it had musically grown to inherit: black metal. Where death metal was a revolution against popular music, black metal was a re-evaluation of its and a distillation of it to its most basic value, which was melodic guitar lines (this was heavily influenced by one of the furthest developments of death metal, the Swedish melodic style as represented by At the Gates and Dismember) causes a re-interpretation of death metal's structuralism: where death metal was narrative through phrasal composition, or a sequence of riff shapes suggesting an ideal, black metal expanded on that by using melody as its primary shaper of idea, and connecting the rhythmic narrative through it, creating not only a sense of progress between themes, but giving a more emotional interpretation without being subsumed by personal emotion (as was common in rock, and the genre that succeeded dying punk hardcore, "emo"). Black metal also grew out of the literalism still present in death metal, preferring mythic and historical themes, and developed an artistic theory that had been lingering in metal since its inception in the neo-Gothic Black Sabbath: Romanticism.

Romanticism remains difficult to define after centuries of study. It is at its most basic a resacralization of life to include not just nature but a human place in it that accepts death as equally necessary to life for the perpetuation of the grounding of life; it is a recollection and celebration of the values of the Greco-Roman ancients, a time before binary morality; a time when natural order was seen as commanding human life not only outside but inside. Romantics espouse an idealization of life, as seen in the concept of "romance" to existence, meaning that through behavior toward higher ideals - fidelity, eternal love, the order of the cosmos - the individual achieves a sense of divinity within life, a transcendence. Romantics do not need individualistic morality, or a world beyond this one for which to live; they live in a physical world but rise above it in thoughts to touch what is important in any age, a furthering of self through greater perception and understanding of the structure of the universe and natural law to the degree that death, life and suffering are seen as agents of fulfilling that structure whose ultimate aim is the beauty and transcendent grace of higher consciousness. Romantics tend to be non-Christian or Christian in a gnostic- or pagan-influenced sense, nationalistic, and in love with the psychological symbolism of mythology and its connection between the present and human life for all time. Romanticism as a genre is almost exclusively European, practiced mostly by the English and Germans and Americans, and gave birth to Europe's height of philosophy, arts and music. The simplest study of Romanticism views it as a period in history, but this is an error, as it is a discipline of thought that has appeared in partial or whole form throughout European history, and continues to be rebirthed to this day. Romantic art can be distinguished for its portrayal of ancient ruins, of the individual as a singular force in a numb world, of respect for the eternal and transcendent attributes of love, and a worshipful attitude toward nature that includes respect for its terrifying aspects, like the singularity of death and the possibility of predation, war, great suffering, and disease; Romantics view suffering as a challenge to be overcome not in and of its own sake, but for the sake of what can be achieved through it, as in the image of a lover suffering for the beloved and feeling his love all the more intense for it. Although like most post-1980 metal, black metal does not mention personal romances, this is its heritage as a genre contrary to individualistic, personal morality; in all other ways, it is strictly Romantic in what it idealizes and represents.

Black metal kept alive in the previous decade through the 1987 release of Sarcofago's "INRI" and the 1989 release of Merciless' "The Awakening," but otherwise, was mostly hibernative. While Venom had coined the phrase "black metal," and many considered Bathory and Sodom to be of the genre, it did not come into its own as a musically distinct whole until renovated by the Norwegians in the years 1990-1993; by the end of that period, it had reached a musical apex and disintegrated in a drama of church arsons, murder, terrorism and politics (the last major outburst of Nationalism, one tenet of Romanticism, was 1933-1945 with the German National Socialist German Worker's Party, or Nazi party, and this similarity as well as outright praise for the NSDAP from black metal bands would cause no end of trouble). The new form of black metal did not use the guttural distorted vocals of black metal, but higher-pitched shrieks that could be contorted to express emotions impossible in a monotone; unlike the detuned death metal bands, black metal bands used standard tuning and turned up the middle ranges and not bass ranges on their amplifiers; where death metal was driven by its percussion, black metal drumming was background timekeeping having more in common with ambient/industrial bands like Kraftwerk and VNV Nation than heavy metal; where death metal song structures aimed at finding an empty mood at the end of conflict, for black metal, conflict in symbolism built to a peak, after which there was a passage through the simplest and barest and most meaningless music possible as a conduit toward an inner peace, and a sense of meaning. In all aspects, black metal was the culmination of the metal ideal since 1969, and its highest degree of musicality and aesthetic yet achieved. Black metal bands, hearkening back to the legend of "Oskorei" or undead warriors who reclaimed earth to remove poisoned-tongued usurpers, painted their faces white and black, and they reclaimed the armor-based aesthetic of early heavy metal which emphasized leather and metal attire. Imagery from the Viking age, from ancient Greece and Rome and India, and the distant occult pervaded songs. Arguably, the first band to spread black metal of this style was Immortal, but it arose simultaneously with Darkthrone, Gorgoroth, Burzum, Emperor, Mayhem and Enslaved, making it difficult to point to one leader. Much as Metallica symbolized speed metal to most people, however, Mayhem was clearly the focal point for most fan attention; not surprisingly, it was the most "heavy metal" of the above list. Interestingly, the next generation of metal produced a number of formative acts, including Graveland, who rediscovered the waltz style in their sweeping and oddly beautiful works.

Black metal thrived for several years and then petered out, with most of the original bands opting to go into ambient and medievalist music (Darkthrone -> Neptune Towers, a Tangerine Dream tribute; Beherit -> "Electronic Doom Synthesis"; Burzum -> a triptych of keyboard albums made from prison). It became the most popular form of metal ever, and coincided with, through a proliferation of CD-pressing technology, home computers capable of recording and mastering albums cheaply, and MP3-based file sharing, the death of the underground. Record companies thrived in the 1980s and 1990s thanks to the new CD technology, which was cheaper to produce and thus granted higher profits, but faltered with the rise of the internet. Record stores were no longer necessary; a wider range of CDs could be had more cheaply online. MP3s meant that fans heard music before they bought it, if they bought it at all (although most metalheads tend to purchase CDs they like if for nothing else because of the often-fantastic cover art). It was no longer a market that sustained an underground and a mainstream, in the conventional sense; if something could be recorded, it would be made into MP3s and sold via super-mainstream sites like eBay and Amazon. Computerized stocking and ordering meant that larger CD-selling enterprises no longer were troubled by the expense of keeping large stocks, and gladly stocked underground metal alongside mainstream bands. The most virulent and antisocial black metal, including Darkthrone and Graveland, appeared in Wal-Mart; mainstream record stores in malls added metal sections, where up until 1997 it was almost impossible to find underground bands. The underground was obsolete and niche marketing replaced it.

VIII.

This brings us to the present era. While black metal thrived until 1993 in Norway, after that it was supplanted by bands from Poland (Graveland, Veles), Greece (Varathron, Rotting Christ), and even the United States (Havohej, Demoncy, Averse Sefira). However, the quality never matched that of the Nordic bands; the "new" black metal was closer to both hardcore and heavy metal, and tended to use shorter riffs in verse-chorus structures interrupted by periodic narrative moments; it was like a throwback to speed metal. As the 1990s waned, it became apparent that little if anything of importance would come out of black metal, artistically, but the genre was more popular than ever before as new fans discovered the formative bands and bought any of thousands of recombinant new ones. It was at this time the first rumblings of discontent emerged from the far-thinking metal fans, although certain Norwegians had espoused this opinion in early 1996: metal had lost forward impetus and had lost sight of its own goals because it was overwhelmed by its new aesthetic power. Black metal, unlike death metal, was beautiful under the distortion; it was theatrical, and it had imagery that called to mind epic surroundings and meaning to life instead of a grungy casting-aside. It had an idea of what society might be, if it were to reclaim itself from the wasteland of modernity. It evoked in its fans a sense of grandeur, a sense of things to achieve, a feeling that the suffering and emptiness of life could be overcome, and that there was something to live for. Imitators poured into the genre, and by 1999, it resembled punk rock and speed metal with black metal vocals more than the foundational black metal of 1991.

Metal will not move forward from this state until it overcomes its aesthetics and finds a connection to its motivation. Early heavy metal bands like Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden and Judas Priest embraced a Gothic worldview; they praised the fallen from past times, used ancient and occult symbolism in their works, and sought a greater meaning in life outside the profit/morality thinking of modernity. This was somewhat sublimated during the speed metal years, but was always present, if nowhere else in the musical dimensions of that genre; it was hard to spot as well in death metal except in the praise of death as a giver of meaning, which is a classic Romantic concept. In black metal alone it found full expression. It was as if black metal, as a language for speaking the values system of all heavy metal genres, gave fluency to an otherwise confused genre half-divided between rejoining rock and becoming something of itself. Now that the language is complete, metal must find a new articulation if it wishes to move on. What might future metal resemble?

Aesthetic

Much of what holds metal back, and against which black metal strained, is the rock-style song format and instrumentation: constant drumming, guitars and bass and vocals, and a need for lyrics to manage some recognizable verse-chorus pattern. Not all of this will disappear, but it is likely these will be used to revert music to a more complicated form as the artistic and conceptual demands of the metal form increase. Form will change with change in conception, and vice-versa; much as Venom's clumsy and primitive music inspired others to develop that aesthetic into a more articulate language, when metal begins moving past the simplistic format of rock music, it will grow toward higher ideals. When percussion leads music, it forces the rigid division of phrase to fit tempo and the conclusion of phrase; in music that is less rigidly aligned to percussion, like that of Tangerine Dream/Neptune Towers or classical, phrases are less repetitive in part because they are not forced into a symmetry of length and position.

Darkthrone, on "Transilvanian Hunger," gutted percussion into a background throb that framed rather than led the development of phrase; other black metal bands experimented with long-phrase drumming that would forego fills to extend a pattern into background prevalence. When drums no longer lead, guitars do, and the changes in riff and phrase expand the music beyond linear repetition. Enslaved on "Vikinglgr Veldi" found some balance in this style by forcing percussion back from a leading role into that of pace, allowing guitars to mingle with other instruments and develop without having to slam to a stop at the end of phrase. Another suggestion here comes from At the Gates, who on "Terminal Spirit Disease" showed full development of longer melodic lines which evolved over the course of each song. Combining these would give metal more of a classical and progressive edge in that it would be purely melodic, and would require greater density of composition, without losing the energy for which it is famous.

Structurally, such a style would give rise to the trellis structure as seen on Deicide's "Legion" and other technical death metal albums: paired motifs themselves split into complementary opposites for several generations, and it is the resolution of each smaller motif that returns the song to the level above it until it achieves a symbosis of its major thematic divide. Gorguts exploited this concept on "Endura," which would be a riff salad except for the clear relationship in pairs of riffs to a central theme; on "Unquestionable Presence," Atheist used this structure to introduce a dominant progression in which variation reinforced theme. In contrast to three-chord rock, this is the fullest extension of the narrative style, and focuses not on completion of a single pattern but on the interweaving of multiple patterns to synthesize an implied common direction to varied pieces. This allows compositions, like classical symphonies, to range widely while having a unifying germinal concept. What is commonly called "progressive metal," like much of progressive rock, fails to utilize this idea so much as it dresses up rock music with a series of distractions designed to obscure the simple-mindedness of the original idea (Opeth and Dream Theatre are guilty here). Although not an argument for "progressive" metal, the idea of narrative trellis composition gives bands the ability to tie together a number of solid but simple ideas into a complex whole based around a central concept of a basic nature; in this style, complexity does not distract but serves to reinforce the major idea.

Into this style will meld a number of techniques. The muffled strum of speed metal can coexist with the open tremolo of black metal because each can be used, in lieu of drumming ending the phrase, to seize or continue a rhythm. Phrases can unfold naturally to fruition and explore each other in a structured improvisation as necessary, or if played as written, be used to develop multiple voices and emotions within a single piece. This is a greater compositional "freedom" than the shorter phrases of rock demand, and while it does require some greater familiarity with music theory, it is not solely anchored to music theory but to the use of music as a voice which represents the content of each song, usually in the narrative format that takes the listener from one concept through its opposite to a sense of balance and continuity. Another technique that will become more commonly used is the wash of overstrum, or adding of notes to a chord by playing them lightly in sequence after the harmonic unity of the chord, which with distortion produces skeins of harmony which not only anchor the melodic phrase but can complement it to differing degrees, changing emotional context. Non-metal band My Bloody Valentine used this technique, as did industrial grindcore act Godflesh, although it also appeared in Mayhem and Burzum among other black metal bands. Together these flexibilities of technique will reduce the need for metal bands to play hard and fast, solid and finite riffs, and allow them a greater range of expression within a dominant mood which will uphold the classic attitudes of metal.

Community

Now that there is no longer a need for the underground, and the underground has shown itself to be susceptible to the same social pressures that made mainstream music detestable to many, it is likely that future metal communities will abandon all pretenses of underground and recognize that only the music will determine its audience. No piece of music can be made so difficult to find or obscure in symbolism that it will not hit the MP3 networks or be sold on Amazon and eBay, so the newer music will rely on its artistic expression alone to select its audience. The true sheep out there have shown they will readily embrace Cradle of Filth and Opeth and Cannibal Corpse even if they sound "angry" because the music is not that different from punk or hard rock, but the preponderance of followers has not followed acts like Neptune Towers or the Burzum ambient keyboard albums. This is not coincidence; people do not like music they do not understand, or which requires too much attention span to deliver the immediate gratification that is favored in increasingly degrees as one approaches the lower mentalities among our society. Metalheads of the future may keep their characteristic long hair and band-logo tshirts, but it is unlikely they will in the future be standoffish; more secure in what their music conveys, and in its esoteric dimensions unlikely to be appreciated by the democratic horde, they will rejoin society as a legitimate voice in its discourse for future. Metal techniques have been assimilated by grunge bands, nu-metal bands, industrial bands and even hip-hop acts; metal cannot stand apart, but must abandon its fear of modern society and fight back by being heard among accepted genres. This is both less extremist than the "underground" and more so, in that it is a demand that the ideas carried by metal, and not just its aesthetic, be considered among others. It is as if metal turned away from society in 1969, but is now returning to the forefront of battle, determined to inject its own DNA into the thoughts of society as whole.

Ideas

Where metal flirted with the occult, it is likely that it will look toward a more academic attitude toward spirituality as a whole; it is probable that anti-Christianity will be replaced with anti-dualism and a sense of the need for a spiritual bonding toward nature in the attitude of Romantics, where there is no dualistic "pure world" (Heaven, "good," Truth, pure forms) but a physical reality in which idealistic transcendence is achieved, and in which a beauty of contemplation can produce a desire to love life and to change it for the better as an ongoing process and not a moral one. It is also likely that a maturing metal genre will cast aside its individualistic baggage, and become not collectivist (like punk) but holistic, in that it will see a cosmic order embracing nature, the collective and the individual, in which the individual plays a role in furthering the development - akin to natural evolution - of higher and more beautiful ideals, of more complex and more perfectly adapted designs. "Truth" will no longer be seen as a dualistic entity which can be attached to a god, or a scientific discipline, or a dollar sign, but as a byproduct of experience by which we assess objects and ideas according to how well they will symbioticaly coexist with the rest of reality.

Nationalism, which caused black metal so much trouble through its use of Nazi symbolism, will likely remain, but in the sense of each nation - Germany, France, Denmark, Iran - speaking up for itself and its indigenous peoples. The "white power" aesthetic that produced National Socialist Black Metal (NSBM) will be rejected in favor of a more naturalistic interpretation, and a renewal of traditional culture and musical archetypes. This does not mean that nationalism will lose its tendency for cultural separation on the basis of ethnicity, but that it will lose the violent bigotry common to "white power" movements, by which all things white are accepted, regardless of nationality, and all other things scorned and ridiculed. Nazism may or may not be interpreted, but the interpretation required for the current era is one of tolerant cultural separation, not violent, symbolic and insular isolation. Nationalism makes sense as a way of preserving each culture against the onslaught of globalization, portrayed in "Industrial Society and Its Futures" by Ted Kaczynski as a leftist movement; it is part of Romanticism, and part of respecting nature and its divisions of humankind. However, "white power" movements see only the color line, and this restricts the artistic ambition of metal to propaganda, which explains in part why after three classic bands NSBM degenerated into boring repetitive music like the rest of the genre.

If there is an area in which metal will expand, it will be to follow its naturalism to accept the natural order as the grounding for life and consciousness itself, and thus a post-moral acceptance of predation, death and suffering as essential to life and joy and growth. From this will come a natural praise for forests, as seen in black metal, and for ecosystems at large; it is possible, indeed, that if metal has a future political alignment, it will be non-leftist Greenism. This fits hand in glove with the depersonalizing tendency of metal, in part because many metal musicians view the West as corrupted by the egos of individuals; metal has for some generations favored a view of the cosmic order as a whole in preference to an individualistic outlook as found in consumer society, democracy, Judeo-Christian morality and hardcore punk.

Conclusion

Until it occurs, future metal will remain an enigma to us. The purpose of this document has been to describe the evolution of metal such that what future metal might be becomes apparent, and so that we know on what basis future metal will diverge from the past. It attempts to reveal through ideas, music and imagery what it is that is quintessentially "metal" and what these ideals reveal about the artform and the intentions of those who create it. It has also devoted a good deal of time to showing how metal has stagnated as a result of reaching a high point of aesthetic evolution, and how in the future, it is necessary to overcome this "safe" ground for higher goals. In one of his most poignant moments of insight, British spymaster Ian Fleming summarized his knowledge in this pithy phrase: "Never say no to adventure." Future metallians must be brave enough to move past a sure thing toward an uncertain ground of experimentation, much as each of us welcome each new day with no idea what will occur within it. Metal at the current time is obsolete and suffocating under its own weight, but there is a future open to all who respect and believe in its fundamental values and direction.

http://www.anus.com/metal/about/metal/future/
User Journal

Journal Journal: What is "death metal"?

Death metal is structuralist heavy metal that borrows heavily from classical and industrial music. Its heritage is equal parts neoclassical heavy metal from the 1970s and hardcore punk from the early 1980s; if you throw Discharge, Judas Priest and King Crimson into a blender and set it on "high," you might get something like death metal. It took from roughly 1983-1988 for death metal to fully evolve, and at that point, it experienced six golden years of fruitful growth before lapsing as black metal eclipsed it in popularity.

The original underground musical genre, death metal was completely unknown to most people until 1997 when it became fodder for mainstream commentary after several school shootings. During the 1980s and early 1990s, it was impossible to find death metal in normal record stores and chains; most people ordered it from small mailorder companies, or "distros," that stocked underground metal exclusively. The underground in fact replicated every aspect of the normal music industry, including journalists and radio stations, to avoid being tainted by "commercial" or "mainstream" music.

We say death metal is "structuralist" because, in contrast to rock music, its goal is not a recursive rhythm riff that encourages constant intensity through verse-chorus structure; death metal, like black metal after it and prog rock and classical before it, uses "narrative" song structure, or a string of phrases connected in such a way that they effect musical and artistic change throughout the song. While rock music aims to find a sweet riff and ride it, and much of older heavy metal does the same, death metal is like opera: its goal is to use riffs to introduce more riffs, and through those, to create a treelike structure of motifs which resolve themselves to a final dominant theme. In this, death metal (like the progressive rock and synthpop bands that influenced it) is closer to classical music than rock music.

The history of rock music has been written by commercial promoters who have tried to establish its "authenticity" and uniqueness, and therefore, almost all mainstream publications are hostile to death metal. Death metal reminds us that rock music, blues and jazz did not arise autonomously in America, but were based on centuries of European popular music (the I-IV-V chord structure of the blues is derived from European folk music, and its "blues scale" is a modification of Asian and Celtic scales). Rock music is a scam, and its marketing makes it seem to be something greater than what it is, which is the same old music dressed up as a product. Death metal more than any genre before it broke from the rock tradition, and therefore is a threat to the rock establishment and its profits.

Like most musical genres in the modern time, death metal is constantly under assault not only from external interests, but from within, as self-interested people try to make rock music and dress it up as death metal. These attempts to simplify the genre would benefit those who attempt them, as they would both be able to make a saleable product (being similar to established musical tastes, it sells easily and broadly) and be able to claim the "authenticity" of belonging to an outsider form of art such as death metal. These false death metal bands have polluted the genre with the same mainstream dogma and musicality that death metal sought to escape. Like all human social breakdown, this breakdown occurs through the selfishness of individuals who are unwilling to admit that the health of the genre is more important than their personal profit.

Death metal flourished from the mid-1980s to mid-1990s, and then was for most purposes replaced by black metal. Where death metal was structuralist with heavy emphasis on chromatic phrasing and hence rhythmic, black metal used narrative construction based on melody (an innovation of later and progressive death metal bands as well, such as At the Gates, Atheist, Gorguts and Demilich). As such, it is often hard to tell where death metal ended and black metal began, although in their mature form they are distinct genres. In this, and in the aesthetic components of death metal borrowed by mainstream bands as varied as Slipknot and Nirvana, death metal lives on.

http://www.deathmetal.org/death_metal/
User Journal

Journal Journal: KCUF neoclassical radio

KCUF Radio Archive

The infamous station that brought to the Internet airwaves the pinnacles in nihilistic death metal, atavistic and romantic black metal, and transcendent ambient soundscapes has been recompiled and archived in its known entirety to initiate the unfamiliar and inspire those who remember.

KCUF Radio

User Journal

Journal Journal: Future

Future

Coffeeshops resemble the internet in that almost everyone you meet in such places has a strong political opinion, or a theory of changing the world. This is fortunate for those who do not desire change, as it means that any possible accord is fragmented into literally millions of perspectives that differ enough to be incompatible. Of course, if you're trying to sound important in a chat room or hipster-beaten sofa, you need the most distinctive appearance for your political opinion possible, so consensus is not your goal.

Luckily for those who study philosophy, it's easy to group these opinions, as they universally represent a few actual viewpoints, when one removes the trivial conflicts where the political thinker is addressing a symptom and not structural function. Despite whatever personal conceits they invent to justify the uniqueness of their opinions, these ornamentations do not affect the general theory of each viewpoint; further, if that viewpoint were achieved in reality, almost all of the decorative uniqueness would be subsumed by a larger function. Even if you're the one republican who favors abortion, if the general theory of your outlook is that the government chooses what should be legal based on republican values, abortion will be decided by that principle, if nothing else through the opinion of a public conditioned to a certain way of doing things.

Almost everyone one encounters has some variation on the Christian-liberal theme, which is the independence of the individual and the consequent deferrment of collective needs; one reason America is a political disaster, as noted by Samuel Huntington in his epic "The Promise of Disharmony," is that the fundamental American political creed is anti-government and anti-collective: it is a form of personal kingdom that becomes selfish only when one sees that its pursuit obviates any chance for consensus or moving to a state of anything but constant debate, conflict and a see-sawing of political power. Americans do not agree on much because their only shared value is the importance of material individualism as expressed through a reluctance to agree. From our Puritan origins, and our massively powerful rhetoric during the Cold War, this amalgamated opinion is as deeply-entrenched as it is hopeless.

There are defectors, of course, most notably Communists, Greens and Nationalists. These are more pragmatic sorts who see the need for some agenda in common so that society can get past a state of constant indecision, which much as neurosis wears down the individual, over time erodes the political will to get anything done and thus leaves the nation susceptible to an ongoing degeneration of function until it reaches a point of third-world chaos. Each of these defector ideologies pulls in its own direction, unfortunately, negating the synergistic effect that could be found from looking at this commonality: they believe in a need for consensus and a higher value system than that of "if it makes money, it's good" and represent our only chance for escape from consumerism. Their problem, in addition to their fundamental violation of the American credo of materialistic individualism, is that each by narrowing in to a specific tenet or issue has excluded from their thinking the necessity of creating a whole system. Society must go on, and cannot radically discard un-Green practices, and life for normal people must not be interrupted by the radically normalizing of Communism; even Nationalists succumb, in that they have unrealistic or nonexistent plans for the rest of society after National separation (or, in the case of the white power wackos, genocide) is achieved.

What unites these dissident viewpoints with the mainstream consumerism-democracy-individualism crowd (who will insist they are themselves individual and unique thinkers, although a structural - "philosophical" - analysis of their beliefs reveals otherwise) is a belief in revolution. At some point, whatever it is that they have found to be defective produces a need for too many changes that inevitably conflict with each other, and like an airplane trying to out-turn too many adversaries, they run out of open space and declare a need for an extreme levelling to make their philosophies work. This inevitably translates into revolution, which takes many forms including genocide, and points to a failure in their thinking: they are looking toward the past. Whether they want to resurrect fallen empires, or remove what they see as a great evil, they are viewing society from the perspective of a frozen moment instead of seeing it as a constantly growing thing. They want an immediate and final solution, and to achieve one of these, one has to eradicate organic details and make big abstract absolute statements, whether "freedom" or "ethnic cleansing," in order to answer a question inextricably bogged down in details.

The revolutionary mindset is to be feared because it lacks a plan beyond revolution. Revolutionaries are inevitably more conditioned by social and political influences in the system they claim to be overthrowing and thus, once they've murdered their leaders and enacted chaos, they have no new structure to put in place and end up mimicking the old. In no small part this originates in the "individualism" of revolutionaries, who are not prone to consensus except the need for something radical to fix everything in one fell stroke. This is like trimming a tree by cutting it down, and hoping something better grows in its place, where in reality trimming a tree is a process of finding out its pattern of growing and making select ("structural") changes. Revolutionaries look toward the past, and hopelessly out of touch with the future, instead repeat the past with a new brandname.

Those who will make any kind of positive change deal in facts, not feelings, whether those are feelings of personal uniqueness or a "it should be this way" desire. Positive change comes from accepting the reality of the situation, and trimming it so that it grows into something better in the future. It does not happen overnight; every overnight "miracle" revolution has collapsed in its own disunity. It is a slow process of nurturing, which includes both stimulating growth and cutting away that which injures correct growth. Positive changers do not look at details, or emotional reactions, but pay attention to structure and modify it so that the whole of society changes. They do not zero in to a single issue and assume that fixing it will magically resurrect the whole. They deal in facts, not feelings or appearances, and they are willing to forego some measure of self-expression in order to find commonality; this, after all, is the founding principle of society: we give up some "freedoms" in order to work together more efficiently. We've forgotten this in the years since founding our society.

When I think of the changes I desire, I look toward the future. I want to group people by culture (nationalism) so that they can make the changes that concern only them, and keep going in their preferred direction; culture is the only antidote to consumerism, corporate robber barons and other entities that place money at a higher emphasis than doing what is right according to a cultural ideal. I want to remove politics from education and give those who can do great things the right tools, and remove pointless barriers from their path. I want to find a way to make industry work without destroying our world, and limit our land use and population so that we do not deplete earth.

I want to do all these things while continuing to grow toward greater heights of culture, learning, art and science; I do not want to give up on civilization. Revolutionaries see only the lack of potential in our current system, and want to destroy it, but are not rebuilders. I know we can make a better future while correcting the past and that all of the sane people, the ones who do not waste time in coffeehouses or ego battles on the internet, will agree with me and give up some degree of "individualism" so we can find common ground. Perhaps this is why the ancients worshipped the sun: even a sunset is part of a cycle that will bring eventually a new day, where new possibilities are infinite.

January 5, 2006

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/future/
User Journal

Journal Journal: FREE SPEECH

After seeing how many internet sites censor their users, we came up with a radical idea: create a site where total free speech reigns, and let the users, not the owners, determine how much of that is acceptable. You can say anything that's legal (home server is in California, USA) on our forums and we won't blink an eye, no matter how much it offends, infuriates or bores us! No censorship - total freedom of thought and speech - a new concept for Internet communication!

FREE SPEECH

User Journal

Journal Journal: Self and Celtic Frost

Self-Righteous

Any time that people start talking about "good" and "evil," the context of topic has become personal. They are talking about personal fears as if they were absolutes, like the concept that god himself will disappear when an individual dies; this is the solipsism forced on those who cannot or are afraid to look at the bigger picture. Personal thinking of this type denies the world as whole, including its intricate mechanisms that we see as an ecosystem but are unaware include us, "from within," as they are based on external forces that influence our survival.

There's a lot in this paragraph, so let's break it down: good/evil morality is personal because it reflects personal fears, that is, "I might be killed," therefore make killing a taboo - then the individual feels safe, even though if someone simply breaks that taboo, the individual is still dead. The order of the world will always support killing because it can happen; morality is an attempt to deny that it can, like a nervous truth enacted between gangs. It makes us feel better to think that killing "should not" occur, but it still does, so we act with increasingly retribution against those who do kill. This goes on to the point where we're willing to kill, and since this offends our psychology, we invent elaborate justifications for when killing should occur (right-wing) or become pacifistic, denying the obvious need of self-defense and thus becoming passive and forever angry at the world for putting us in that state (left-wing).

That every society on earth so far has divided itself roughly into these states, the liberals who focus more on the sanctity of individual life to justify passivity against the conservatives who focus more on ritual removal of the Other, should show us how this path is not only human but endemic to any group of thinking, autonomous beings; it is one of the fundamental choices about how one orders a civilization, uniting individual perspectives/lives into a collective force. If pressed, even your most extreme liberal will admit there are times when force is needed: an invader, a rapist, a truck dumping toxic waste in a river. We respect Gandhi because he entirely denied this and suggested an ultra-passivity, or commitment to non-violence, but this is useless in a practical sense: our inner animal wisdom does not respect a person who watches his or her family get raped, a country that does not repel invaders, or those who would not shoot accurately to stop irrevocable poisoning of a river.

However, any time we consider force in the abstract, our personal fears crop up: what if it's applied to me? If we have nothing to live for except the individual, this is the greatest sadness to us, like the death of God; our entire worlds will go away and since we see the world only through the individual, to us it is as if the world itself has died. Those who have wit enough to live for more than the self can content themselves with the thought of family, great art, or natural landscapes surviving, but they are in the minority. This is the difference between seeing the world-as-individual, and seeing world-as-whole. In the latter state, we don't think only of ourselves, but see ourselves as the result of an ongoing process of life that can be taken as a whole. Something caused the universe to start, even if internal, and its has natural laws that continue the process of life beyond even human beings. When we see the world not as a city, or social group, or even planet, but as a cosmic order, we finally have the scope of perspective to see where we - tiny chunks of talking meat - fit in.

From this fear, and not from a sense of designing a plausible place for ourselves in a cosmic order, we create the absolutes we call morality, which we guise as "helping others" to disguise our inner selfishness and insecurity. As soon as this becomes common practice, the surrounding civilization enters its final age, when big impractical concepts like "freedom" (wage slavery), "free speech" (except what offends), "happiness" (empty pursuit of wealth) and "luxury" (ability to gain better goods and services than please mass taste) start getting bandied about in the same tone of voice reserved for morality. Society has at that point begun misleading itself for the purposes of the selfish not few, but mass - most people begin to think selfishly, and acting together, they create a degenerate empire that is at its core parasitic. There is no evil right-wing, Jewish, Masonic or corporate conspiracy, but those evils arise because of the openings created by the degeneration of society as a whole.

Such is the nature of disunity, that it starts with personal instability and rises to a religious level of dogma; people cease to pay attention to the task of survival, and focus entirely on their own wants, which most commonly don't jive with the best interests of society and the cosmic order ("personal" wants, by their very nature, are things forbidden to most for reasons of excess or destructivity). People are no longer looking at what is right, but what is "right" according to their own personal mysticism, and as a result, all the finer things of civilization - art, philosophy, architecture - degenerate into functionalism, because there is no concern for what is good in an overall sense; there is only concern with personal importance and profit. Interestingly, both right- and left-wing thinkers agree that excessive concern with wealth and individuality cause a depilation of all collective and environmental concerns. Yet both have their hands tied, as a founding part of their philosophies involves this sense of personal identity-as-world.

The sad truth of human psychology is that we cannot discover more of it by looking inward, but by looking outward: our psychology is entirely shaped by the broadest type of experience, that of being born an autonomous being that must adapt to its environment. All of our impulses, including our ingrained spiritual outlook, are adaptations which when properly interpreted make sense. Of course, since a society of the ego perverts these, most of us have not seen them in a sensible form during our lifetimes, except in brief glimpses into the biographies of famous artists. Since the disease has run so deep, it has broken people down to the point where they do not even consider themselves with reverence, but devote their entire attention to cheap tangibles, such as money and popularity and novelty, as well as the age-old pursuit of manipulating others to avoid being bored.

Total Darwinism

Why do we care if our civilization, or our race, or even our species, flounders? After all, we'll probably live comfortable lives and then it's someone else's problem. My answer to this is twofold: we enjoy living, and thus damage ourselves when we act against the greater force of life and recess into ourselves, and further, if we believe all is lost for the future, there is nothing to live for except transient desires which ultimately won't keep us fascinated for long. We will be like the spectral residents of nursing homes, besotted with television and alcohol, drenched in the luxury of a life's wealth accumulation, and yet completely without any longstanding meaning in their lives. This premature aging can already be seen in our youth, who live for brief excess and then settle down to a beaten impotence, mourning days past yet dutifully trudging toward an existence in which they do not believe.

Charles Darwin, in formulating his nascent theory of evolution, observed how external forces (much as influence our psychology, inherently) shaped species by eliminating unfavorable traits and promoting positive ones, much as we do by inclusion or exclusion of individuals in our own friend groups. He soft-toed the question of applying this theory to humanity, which occurs on two levels. First, the quality of our population is determined by the actions we reward; when we give best prize to those who greedily make the most money, we create a society of sneaky, aggressive parasites. Second, our own civilization is judged by its fitness, and when easy wealth such as is offered by oil resources vanishes, the competition will eliminate those civilizations which cannot stand on their own. A disunified society full of idiots, no matter how great its warriors, will collapse when attacked because of internal chaos as people thinking only of their own imminent death freak out and run around screaming, counteracting any attempt at counteracting the attack. This is why all great civilizations die from within. Some extend this to race, but I would like to extend it further: to interplanetary concerns.

While our science has not yet detected alien life, to look at the situation mathematically is to see that it is not only possible that other planets have life, but almost certain. The same external forces that pressure the development of multiple competing species on earth will apply to the cosmos in general; while the distances are vast, and we can barely see past our own front porch, it is most likely that other species are developing in parallel to our own. Much as there are basic "tests" for any species on earth, like its ability to find food and mates, and there are similar "tests" for civilizations, like the ability to preserve unity in war and peace alike, there is a test for humanity, and it is whether we destroy ourselves through disunity before we make it to the stars, and whether we are of sufficient intellectual quality once we do to hold our own with the competition. I haven't seen any UFOs yet, nor do I necessarily believe they have visited, but I am certain, looking at the mathematics of nature and the stars, that civilizations capable of building something like them are out there, and if they mature and have their act together more than we do, in the future humanity will be subjugated if not eliminated.

Ice Age

Perhaps it is part of nature's order that things going wrong synergize one another, creating something more like a landslide than the orderly procession of rocks in sequence down a mountain (some would say humans think of things as sequential because individuals are sequential: one is either one, or another, but two never have the same mind except in cases of transcendent love). It does make some sense; the end of the Kali-Yuga, or age of Iron, is one in which humanity gets too powerful for itself and loses control, consuming itself through selfishness. Simultaneously, the changed climate, coinciding with natural variation in cycle, becomes inhospitable, and most being disorganized and existing in a frenzy of envy and hatred and revenge for one another perish. Those few who survive make it to a safe but uncomfortable place, and because they believe in life, they tough it out for millennia, being shaped by the natural selection of a harsher climate. Presumably, those who remain behind degenerate further until they're little more than half-removed from chimpanzees, creating an anti-civilization which survives merely through animal will.

The hyperborean mythos suggests that something such as this happened long ago. Before our modern races and religions and countries, there was an ice age, and a small group trekked to the north to escape the chaos brought on by collapsing civilizations. Their thought was simple: because the cold is feared, we rush into the cold, so that those who would otherwise overthrow us with their greater numbers are left behind. The small group struggled at first, but eventually found ways to prosper, not in the least because natural selection made them smarter, taller, of denser muscle and faster nerves. Their eyes got better and their digestion optimized for living with primitive technologies such as domesticated animals and milled grain. They accumulated learning, in part to take advantage of shorter growing seasons and in part to pass the time during long winters. From this came a race of superhumans who, without the pretense of moral fear or distraction by wealth, came out of the north as it thawed and spread their knowledge and genetics around the world, creating our modern races out of hybrids of hyperboreans and those-left-behind.

A future hyperborean migration is possible because, if humanity encounters crisis, it's unlikely that all of us will die at once. Small groups will recognize the reality of the situation faster than their fellow distracted and delusional citizens, and will give up their wealth and social status in order to survive in the rough. The disease, famine, warfare and internal strife that will shatter even the most formidable civilization will not touch such a group, in part because they will be occupying land that does not offer any immediate promise of easily-obtained resources. Far from gold, oil and precious gems, they will forge a civilization based on a will to survive, and to reach higher. Several things will shape them via natural selection: the necessity of adapting to cold and lack of abundant food; the need to live cautiously and inventively; denial of personal comfort (those who need comfort to live will perish); a long-term spiritual vision based on denial of tangible things in favor of long-term tangible goals; a need for fewer people to get along more efficiently and do the work that would otherwise required many more. Their societies will be more spread out, less sociable, and more introspective, and these people will emerge after thousands of years with much higher IQs and more importantly, greater focus to their personalities and an inherent cosmic spirituality which accepts that life is worth living no matter what short-term or tangible factors seem to contradict that.

This winnowing and upbreeding process could happen a group of Africans, a group of Jews, or a group of Germans, but it is not a moral decision by nature: the cosmic order is a dumb process, one that works by repetition and not consideration. Over time, through natural selection, whatever group manages to escape will be altered to have higher capacities, becoming a more proficient and smarter version of itself by degrees until it ultimately resembles the original hyperborean race. The same factors that selected hyperboreans will still be in effect, and much as humans evolved from primitive mammals, these factors of natural selection will refine slovenly modern humans into superhumans. The less capable the starting group, or the more mixed the group's genetic character, the longer this process will take.

In this new race, an aristocracy will arise, because sensible survival-oriented beings pick those among them that are most capable of leadership, and follow their wisdom through strife and good times alike. They will carry with them a uniform spirituality, a singular will, and roughly similar customs and personal appearances and behaviors, although within their minds there will be a great diversity of perception and character. Outwardly, -- well, they will not be fascinated by outward appearances of the ego, as modern people are. They will be focused on the areas where one can truly prove uniqueness, like personality and learning and the overcoming of fears. Who can deny that this new race will be superior to modern humanity, even if we are many and have pretty technologies and wealth? And yes, in time, they will discover the same sequence of inventions we have, or one closely related, and develop the ability to reach out to the cosmos through interplanetary travel.

All of this will take a hundred thousand years or more, but much as every error in life costs us time, every screwup in civilization delays us by what is not long to natural process but is many lifetimes for us puny mortals. Oh well - the next time someone says that stupid people and Crowdists don't harm you, remember the idea of your descendants waiting two thousand lifetimes to undo the damage that herds do! Joke's on you, of course. Maybe you could abandon some of your own selfish habits and work with others toward a human-oriented natural selection and leadership process that undoes this great error before it occurs, but maybe it's too late. See what's on TV.

When you look toward the new year, think about everything unnecessary that you can give up and all the things you can do to work toward a future in which a slimming of the human population according to a long-term goal of better humans and a less selfish future. We can do it, if we choose, before nature sees fit to simply terminate most of us and renew the natural selection process. If we do, we will reclaim and restart all that has been wonderful among our peoples and civilizations.

Celtic Frost and Metallica

I have come to distrust people who read only a certain genre of book, because that makes it clear that whatever the genre, they're reading for entertainment. They have found something they like and wish to repeat the experience. Of course, this is lessened when they read only literature or only philosophy, but even so, those habits can quickly become self-gratifying as well. There is a difference between entertainment, and art or learning; the latter division will bring something of the world to you, where the former will dress up the same old habits and ideas as something "novel," or superficially new, so that you can entertain yourself and avoid reality. While there's nothing wrong with some avoidance of reality, those who need "entertaining" are really little black holes of will that cannot generate their own path in life and thus like to be distracted.

Reading Thomas Gabriel Fischer's "Are You Morbid? Inside the Pandemonium of Celtic Frost" (Sanctuary Publishing, 2000, London, 339 pages), I was struck by how much the story of humanity is acted out in microcosm through metal music. In creating a metal band, the same boundaries of logic exist that face an organism: it must find sustenance, defend predators and procreate (the wicked). Much as a civilization faces an uncertain landscape and the possibility of being overwhelmed, a metal band is also like a small society: four or five guys who work together not on completing a predefined task, but on pouring inspiration and feeling into a musical work so that it meets their own standards. Fischer's book details his strategies and experience in going from clueless teenager to world-renowned metal musician.

First, some on the book itself: according to Fischer, an American editor helped out, which suggests that this book needed a higher budget, as plenty of slang like "kicks butt" and "to the max" occurs, followed up by repeated use of phrases and often rambling discursive passages when summaries would have sufficed. It could easily be cut by a hundred pages to make room for more stories and footnotes, in which some of the meatiest and most revelatory details are encoded. Where it succeeds is relating the raw information through the perspective of metal heads who avoided the excess of drugs and (mostly) drink, so what we have is a clear narrative that is fortunately too wise to try to explain it all to us. Despite some editorializing by Fischer, what we get is mostly a factual narrative that isn't tied together except by the reality-based dimensions of the story. No metaphor, no religion, no theory.

Although the book is apologetic, in that Fischer bemoans his errors too much and tries to explain away past failings, it is formidable in knowledge because of that same apologetic tendency, as Fischer avoids celebrating a past without reservation, and acknowledges the steady process of Celtic Frost's decline from seminal material into the excremental heap known as "Cold Lake," and uses the culmination of that descent to explain his exit: when the inspiration and ability to create great works had departed, Fischer lost interest in what was otherwise a grueling, brutal process that rewarded morons over geniuses. When that inspiration was there, he had no problem suffering the rigors of a metal musician's life, but as soon as that transcendent goal departed, he was without will to continue. The section of the book that explains this decision is astutely candid.

Fischer details the errors made by himself and other members of the band, and makes repeated references to industry and fans, but would be better served by segregation into topics after the narrative has concluded, even if these rehash the path described by the rest of the book. It's almost too much to interleave analysis of industry with the history of the band because it is not mentioned frequently enough to qualify as a thread; it's more like a periodic aside interrupted by a story. The book would be better served by truncating some of its less relevant stories, focusing more on the type of revealing anecdotes at which Fischer obviously excels (and which propel the first part of the book). It could benefit from above all else more of his lucid analysis of what fans reward with their dollars, and the mechanics of popularity in a relatively closed system genre such as heavy metal.

This leads us to the crowning achievement of the book, which is essentially Fischer's introspection regarding his behavior and how it translated into music, both sucessfully and -- well, if you've heard "Cold Lake," you know the agonizing sounds of Celtic Frost failing. Reading carefully, one can find a short list of how Tom G. Warrior thinks bands succeed:

1. Practice daily: hard work and familiarity with the material is key to success.
2. Walk/bike/take a train to practices: meditative introductions to work.
3. Avoid luxury and drama: the more external forces distracted, with pleasure or pain, the less successful the band were.
4. Be focused on the end product as itself: when Celtic Frost made great material, it was because the musicians were caught up in an impetus to make great art for its own sake, like a transcendent experience for the listener that the musicians as listeners would like to have. During times of success, they saw the art as a task in itself, not as a task that was a means/tool toward the end of greater wealth or popularity. Music is its own goal, and to make excellent music, one must focus on the end product as a desirable experience and not an audience manipulation for an end other than enlightenment and sharpened awareness through music.

It is this final point that, through the melancholic shades of nostalgia and retrospect, Fischer reveals to us like a spiritual manifesto of Celtic Frost: the experience itself must be worthy, because the tangible rewards pass too quickly and are meaningless to a mind geared toward larger concepts or consciousness. At these moments of discussion, he ceases to be a musician past his prime and becomes a larger-than-life neo-philosophic figure who reveals to us, through the metaphor of the experience of a heavy metal band, a trenchant analysis of the modern time. We have become focused on the tangible, and have forgotten the experiential, and thus tend toward luxury and distraction and a lack of hard work, as if we have become focused more on ourselves than on what we share with the world, or the art of living.

He isn't the only one to undergo this process, although he might have learned more than Metallica, who seem to be awash in the same currents without Fischer's inner lighthouse to even looking back make clarity of the madness. Metallica started as a hungry, ambitious band whose goal at first was to make the coolest ass-kicking metal they could envision, but over time, have become bloated Hollywood shipwrecks who live in luxury and try to falsify the anger and lust for life they felt once long ago and expressed successfully in a core of seminal albums. Much as Celtic Frost did on "Cold Lake," after "...And Justice for All," Metallica have focused on their art as a means to the ends of popularity and thus wealth. Unlike Fischer, Metallica were from California, and thus have been naturals at image manipulation and have succeeded wildly where Fischer left off, although he will be remembered more fondly at his funeral.

Conflicted musicians, after they lose impetus, never regain that momentum that allowed them to be greats earlier in their lives, and while they may live in more luxury, they feel as if a part of their soul is missing. They're correct. What was once an inspirational process, a pure pouring of life-spirit into artistic form, has now become a job like anything else: a task to be completed for tangible ends. Long-suppressed personal failings are given air by popularity, and the pursuit of a lifestyle to work around these failings creates further hypocrisy. They become exhausted, not in a physical sense, but a metaphysical one. Most immediately blame the aging process, but Fischer is still smart as a whip and clearly spirited; what he hints at, deftly, among the pages of "Are You Morbid?" is that it is not youth, but spirit, that determines the quality of work: the body will rot, but the mind can keep together if unified by a belief in the task as itself, or, in making art for no purpose other than making a greater artistic experience. It's tautological, but to make metal music for any purpose other than making great metal music results in a broken musician, and Fischer also hints that we can apply this to other areas of our lives.

This looking at experience as a thing-in-itself which can be separated from the mechanisms used to foist it upon the world and by which reward is gained is reminiscent of an awkward scene from V. P. Rozan's short play, "The Entitlement of Epiphanus":

Marcusian: Don't say that - it is vile.
Thelemanus: Don't tell me what to say.
Romanus: Ha, don't you see? You're both telling each other what to do!

Rebellion is the same action as that which it claims is oppression. What must be found is proof in action, simply creating a better example of what existence can be through experience, and through it making an uplifting or transcendent experience. Celtic Frost may have been moribund, violent and aggressive, but it conveyed a sense of power in living through which one overcame death by giving it context, and then turned death around and used it as one of the colors in an artist's palette, as if affirming its necessary place in life as a step toward reaching other places. You cannot fight things that suck in life as political bands do, but you must create better prototypes of existence (experience), art that rises above and uplifts, no matter what its topic area - this is what we learn from Thomas Gabriel Fischer and, in contrast, the continued dismal artistic failure inversely related to vast commercial success of Metallica.

Evolution, of individuals or civilizations or species, is a similar process. One cannot base it upon rebellion against certain issues or facts, but can only do it successfully by reaching for something higher, even if expressed in subarticulate terms like "that would kick ass" or inspire; what makes life more intense and more organized is the goal, as that leads to a greater experience, even if most people would rather simply be entertained (much like most now prefer watching TV to doing anything of note, or even, anything). Most people will grasp the tangible, and see life as a means to a tangible end, but as we learn from metal musicians, life is intangible and can only be used as an end to itself. Tautological? The ancients knew this argument and expressed it as eimi, or "I am what I am." The goal of existence is itself; the goal of any being or civilization or species is its own survival.

When we look at the human present, and the human future, it is important to remember that we have lost sight of this truth and are slowly regaining it, but we cannot solely do it prescriptively, and we cannot do it from the self-righteous principle of utilizing experience as a way of making our public selves glow brighter. We must rediscover what inspires us and use this transcendent experience as a means of motivating us toward creating more intense forms of existence, including evolutionary success on a personal and planetary level. Only in this have we found a larger order than that of the individual, and something that will outlast us at our funerals.

December 31, 2005

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/self/
User Journal

Journal Journal: EGOISM

Egoism

It is never so easy to see how one's behavior does not fit into as it is to observe the same in another. The West, seen from outside, appears to be in the grips of an egoism, or fascination with self-image and self-identity, that will surely crush it from within. No matter how much Western leaders and thinkers would like to blame terrorism, European right-wingers, drugs, Asians or Negroes, the West has undone itself by being fascinated by itself. This occurs on an individual level and since individuals compose a whole, eventually becomes a social standard, or an accepted mode of thought and behavior.

We can see some of egoism's many traces in what the West seems to value through its literature, films, art and politics. First is pity, or the ability to feel better about oneself for seeing another as downtrodden and through condescension and compassion, "helping" or at least empathizing with them. Second is egalitarianism, or the science of making us all equal; those who preach it the most do so to liberate themselves from outside criticism so they can make a bundle ("some are more equal than others," he said, counting his cash). Third is altruism, or justifying one's behavior as better for others, and thus feeling good about oneself because one exists to help others, although most commonly - as in the case of the Reverend Jesse Jackson and David Duke - it is used as a shield for one's own enrichment.

All of these are symptoms, but the crowning and identifying factor is individualism: the human personality is seen as an island, and expected to act only in its interests regardless of the impact on its surroundings (self-interest is a paradox: in order to fully enjoy it, you have to make sure you don't destroy that which sustains you, e.g. environment and society). Individualism in perverse ways justifies the above symptoms because those who believe it will justify pity, egalitarianism and altruism by claiming those make them feel better, and therefore they have the "right" to pursue them. Very little in life corresponds to its surface definition, and here we have two excellent examples: altruism justifying individualism, and individualism justifying an altruism which serves the altruistic individual more than those "helped." This is not to say that altruism and egalitarianism do not have some beneficial aspects, but to note that in the larger picture, their presence is more destructive than that which they solve, as measured in the context of the whole of humanity.

You would not think that these seemingly contradictory impulses would combine except when it is realized that altruism is a projection of the self onto others; it, like many other things, is a subtle means of control. In the altruistic mindset, others exist and suffer so that the self can help them and feel better about itself. We might call this altruism a disease, since those who are infected by it are unaware of the destruction they render, mostly because they are only conscious of their own feelings - this is the definition of egoism. Egalitarianism, altruism and individualism are manifestations of the same idea, which is a worship of self by manipulation of external forces. It is as if internally we are in disarray, so we turn to the things outside of us, figuring that if we put them in the right order, we will become better, even though the only things that can cure us are entirely within. We might even call it a very advanced form of procrastination, or denial.

This egoism reveals an inner insecurity and weakness, a lack of confidence in one's own worth, something described in the Bhagavad-Gita as arising from caste-mixing, by which those with a lower-caste mentality are given higher-caste powers, like handing a disaffected teenager a machine gun. Unfortunately, the most egoistic among us are always the loudest voices and most socially prominent faces; the squeaky wheel gets the most grease and because our society is egalitarian and thus we're all "equal," we look for those who stand out above the crowd. The easiest way to stand out is to be loud and "unique," and these factors have no bearing on how accurate one's ideas or intents are, which means that those we see as most active in society are not its thinkers but its parrots and firebrands. Those who actually keep the place running are not the egoists but those who instead of trying to dominate the inner world through outer forces, order their inner selves carefully. For such people, there is no impulsive need to control the outer world except to fulfill legitimate needs such as survival, and thus, they undramatically and simply complete tasks well without expecting to "express themselves" through them.

Indeed, the individual that is confident is the one that has accepted the external world as solely function, and having thus dismissed its connection to internal self-esteem, is free to act in harmony with it - this individual is free of projection, and does not attempt to use external forces to bolster flagging self-confidence. In this there is a truer independence, because one neither expects nor needs anything from outside the self except sustenance and natural beauty. It is a true maturity: to recognize that one's own death means nothing more or less than the slaughter of a cow for dinner, that one's own life will pass unrecorded no matter how many ozymandian monuments one creates, that in order to give birth or survive one must endure massive pains. All of these are true and yet what makes life great is not dependent on them, nor marred by them, so such a confident individual sees them as means to an end. What is important is within, and cannot be shaped from outside, so the external takes secondary importance to internal discipline and spiritual balance. This is the traditional, naturalistic view of existence.

Although the illusion is that what is significant differes widely between human beings, this is unlikely, because all of us live in the same world and it defines wholly what we find important. We must survive; we must procreate; we must find something to do that passes our time in a way that we do not entirely mind death when it comes. Family and friends, a place in the community, a chance to do good work in whatever field one finds interesting, some degree of comfort but not opulence - these are the eternal things that in every generation, in every era, in every land, the best people discover as important, letting the madding crowd and its ever-increasing demands for novelty and distraction pass aside. When we seek maturity, we do it by getting to know and tolerate ourselves, by overcoming our fears and doubts, and then without illusion achieving what is important to living things, namely a better form of life itself. And what makes life better, oddly, is within us more than outside of us. We might need to do work externally to make things better for survival, but beyond that, all of our values concern our own behavior and spiritual balance with the bigger factors of existence, like death and suffering. When we're at peace with these, the rest of life is simple and functional and not all that important.

Asian philosophers often rail against the egoism of the West, but what they might instead wish to condemn is its crowd revolt; the confident and sane are not those with an overbearing need for power through numbers, and they are not the loudest voices, because they have no need to convince themselves. The herd, on the other hand, has no internal spiritual peace and no balance, and therefore both needs to be heard and to assert its power, drowning out the sensible ones. To a naturalist and traditionalist, of course, this is why throughout most of history those who could not distinguish themselves were "oppressed." For their own good, they were ruled by those who had an internal calm and therefore were not likely to project their own neurosis into the external world through damaging actions. Philosophers of the future might like to point this out, since the egoism of the West does not infect is best people, but those are a minority that is rarely represented in the public drama, since anyone who has escaped that insane mindset is probably both very aware of being at risk from those who have not and equally mindful of the lack of influence a voice of reason has on the insane.

Another problem with indicting egoism is that the mandate against it will be interpreted in the crowd-sense, and the crowd will promptly turn on anyone who rises above the herd, screaming "Death to the Egoist!" Those who lack altruism will be seen as egoists; those who do not affirm egalitarianism will be seen as egoists; those who do not greedily seek power for the individual will be seen as some kind of sick egoist. The path of condemning egoism to a crowd leads to a more subtle and insidious form of egoism. The only solution to egoism is to break the power of the crowd by defying it at every turn, for each thing we do that they deny is observed by others and weakens crowd-power in those eyes, not so much turning them to another side but turning them away from faith in crowd-logic. When crowd belief fails here as it is slowly failing in Europe, we can again appoint strong leaders who will instead of trying to flatter the population, hit them with the hard truths: not every homeless person can contribute anything of value, not every individual desire is legitimate, no one is equal, and not everyone should have a chance at wealth and the power it conveys.

The egoists will cry out at this mention, naming us as "oppressive" and "sociopathic," but the question that will still their noise is thus: are our methods an end in themselves, as they are with the crowd (freedom = freedom to pursue illegitimate individual desires), or are they a means to a greater end? And if that end makes life better for humanity as a whole entity trying to survive on this planet, do they need justification? The asking of these questions is the defiance of egoism, or the desire to make the self greater by manipulation of external and trivial things, and a return to naturalism, or an existence in harmony with the order of the universe. Ego cannot defy ego, but reaching out to a greater and more comprehensive truth will crush egoism like the fallacy it is.

December 27, 2005

http://www.anus.com/zine/articles/egoism/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Why Youth Movements Fail

Achievement versus Failure

The Baby Boomers, born during and after WWII, will be the wealthiest generation to ever exist in America and Europe. When people criticize the boomers, they generally do so on the basis of their selfishness. Unlike any other generation, the Baby Boomers - the "Me generation" - were the most focused on themselves and their personal wants. They were also the most politically active in recent memory, although all of their political impetus was directed at achieving more individual "freedom."

This "freedom" came in the form of an individualism that said collectivity and a shared goal should be forgotten and replaced by the pursuit of happiness of the individual, which rapidly translated into the pursuit of unique and individualized experience. This included a large amount of personal conceit, being the construction of a novel personality-object reinforced through purchases of art, daily objects and literature that together were taken as a construction of the values of the individual. Universal or objective truth was out; personal identity and the ego were in.

It is no surprise then that the Boomers chased egalitarianism and "freedom," because their goal was ultimately one of selfishness: they wanted to be able to construct whatever identities they desired and in order to do this, they needed to remove any external standards which might point out that egomania is not productive and does not help society as a whole. "Freedom," sensu Boomer, is an antidote to having any kind of goal to civilization against which individual actions can be compared and found wanting.

For all the protesting and drama that the hippie era generated, it produced few lasting changes. There were civil rights revolutions, more "freedom" for blacks and women. Public standards of behavior and appearance were relaxed. Even marijuana is now more socially accepted. But did the overall course of society change? We're still wage-slaves overpopulating a planet and thus committing a profound ecocide, but the Boomers only gave this lip service, since to stop ecocide requires we lose our selfish "freedom" and start having standards in common against which egomania can be compared and found wanting.

Keith Kahn-Harris, an academic writer who studies among other things heavy metal music, wrote a paper in which he tried to answer the question "Why do subcultures and youth culture make a lot of noise, but ultimately, produce no lasting changes?" He might as well have been writing about the hippies/Boomers. Here is his abstract:

This article examines an enduring question raised by subcultural studies: how youth culture can be challenging and transgressive, yet 'fail' to produce wider social change. This question is addressed through a case study of the black metal music scene. The black metal scene flirts with violent racism, yet has resisted embracing outright fascism. The article argues that this is due to the way in which music is 'reflexively antireflexively' constructed as a depoliticizing category. It is argued that an investigation of such forms of reflexivity might explain the enduring 'failure' of youth cultures to change more than their immediate surroundings. - Keith Kahn-Harris

Poor Keith has to labor under the behavioral constraints of academia, and thus there's a lot of what appears to be doublespeak in the above excerpt; in fact, it is manipulation of symbols carefully coded by academics to represent behavior. When he speaks of "reflexive" behavior, he means a rejection of social constraints, and with that in mind, we can see that what he is saying is that youth culture is too selfish to embrace a plan that requires actual effort and accomplishment of its goals. The unstated meta-goal of youth cultures is egomania, and this translates well into a kind of anarchy that accepts the idea "I don't want other races near me" but will never accept the burden of collective responsibility.

His point is well taken, especially now that black metal has wound down into a three quality bands surrounded by 30,000 imitators and generic mediocre ones. The original artists had a conception of what values were higher than a society they found wanting, in part because it is so selfish it has banished reality in favor of personal novelty and other egomaniacal pursuits. The artists who follow are in it for the popularity, even if in a tiny subculture, and the sense of "belonging" rather than making waves. Like the Boomers, they have confused dislike of society's poor choices with being "oppressed" by the fact of having to make values choices at all, and thus for the most part have cast aside value choices and instead trumpet what personal accoutrements they desire.

For most black metallers, nationalism and a better form of society are inaccessible ideas. To understand nationalism, one has to look at the pattern of society as a whole and thus conjecture a better design of civilization. It is not a personal pursuit or conceit, but a question of doing what is best for everyone, at the cost of some personal sacrifice. While black metallers recognize that our society is dooming itself by its lack of vision and divorce from reality, they fail to escape the same mental trap that got it there, and therefore only think of their own wants and desires. This is the nature of youth culture: shallow, selfish and impotent.

Does anyone remember Ritual? They were one of the first black metal bands from the United States after the surge of great work from Europe. Their music was wholly derivative, as was their image, and to those who were black metal fans at the time, what Ritual recorded was downright stupid and a dumbing-down of the black metal idea to make it more like rock and radio metal (Metallica). To a fan today, Ritual is not as offensively terrible. Standards have relaxed, and the mediocre has supplanted the great, because black metal today is a selfish popularity cult based on belonging. Because of this, any "ideology" it has is purely personal and reflects lifestyle choices, not a widescale idea of what a better world might be like. People adopt "ideology" as part of their self-image, to justify themselves or to have a place with others, and have no intention of working on achieving it.

It is for this reason that the press and academics consider black metal to have "failed." It did not achieve its goals. In fact, it became absorbed by the same forces it detested. Where it could have found a sensible philosophy, derived from the Romantic/Gothic beliefs of the original black metal bands which include nationalism, instead it opted for the selfish, which resembles anarchy, self-pity and bigotry. Black metal has failed, just like the hippies before it, because it became a popularity contest instead of an ideological movement. The next time someone tells you to be tolerant of the stupid ideas of other people because "it's just their own way of life, and it doesn't affect you," remember that they're wrong and the failure of black metal is proof of their delusion.

http://www.anus.com/metal/about/metal/fail/
User Journal

Journal Journal: Why Youth Cultures Fail

This article examines an enduring question raised by subcultural studies: how youth culture can be challenging and transgressive, yet 'fail' to produce wider social change. This question is addressed through a case study of the black metal music scene. The black metal scene flirts with violent racism, yet has resisted embracing outright fascism. The article argues that this is due to the way in which music is 'reflexively antireflexively' constructed as a depoliticizing category. It is argued that an investigation of such forms of reflexivity might explain the enduring 'failure' of youth cultures to change more than their immediate surroundings.

(Translation: youth culture always becomes more about socialization and buying products to socialize about, thus loses all impetus. Punk. Hippies. Death metal. Black metal. Techno. All failed, all for the same reason: popularity became greater than ideology. The crowd took over.)

Full PDF text:
http://ecs.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/7/1/95.pdf

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...