Ya know, MMOs have life cycles. They get born, they age, they eventually die.
And I quietly wonder what will happen to the WoW addicts that suddenly lose the last bits of meaning their life has...
Do you even play WoW? Game mechanics are better than they have ever been. PvP isn't at its peak, but thats a minority of the players. I think it's pretty clear that generalizations taken from other MMOs simply do not apply to this game.
I know for a fact there are achievements for "Server First Max Skill XXX" where XXX is some tradeskill. I contend that is impossible for one player to become the server's first max skill leatherworker, blacksmith, alchemist, enchanter, and engineer (plus there's a few more) so there is no possible way he could attain "ALL" the achievements.
These are "Feats of Strength" and do not count towards the "Achievements" that they are talking about here.
Considering that's almost 5 years of entertainment and actually a good game, is that really so much.
The escapist had an article a few weeks ago making the same point. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/view-from-the-road/6500-A-View-From-the-Road-The-Subscription-Equation
One may be more comfortable, decreasing the cognitive dissonance associated with translating mental (re)actions to hand actions.
That's not what cognitive dissonance is. Cognitive dissonance is when you take an action that contradicts or is not explained by your beliefs about how you should have acted, and you change your beliefs after the fact in order to explain the action you took. It is not just when you have some kind of mental uncomfortableness. I'm sure wikipedia has examples.
Will it be a fun, enjoyable gaming experience (possibly more fun then DoTA, a game I already have access too)? You seemed to leave out that minor detail.
The NDA asks us really not to share "ANY INFORMATION", so I assume that's why.
What might be more helpful, at least in some instances, is
Thought I'd do a short summary of his argument by just presenting the results... now you have everything you need to know to discuss this subject! No need to rtfa.
My cynicism knows no bounds, which gives me to think what the Democratic response to this might have been if a Bush Administration official had proposed it. I'm betting something to the tune of, "Oh those damned Republicans they want to use band-aid technological fixes so they can go on driving their SUVs over baby polar bears for another ten years!"
Tried to think of a similar situation, but the closest I could think of was when Obama pointed out that keeping your tires inflated to the proper psi could save a lot of gas for the whole nation. McCain criticized it because, I dunno, it wasn't as sexy as electric cars? It's actually a perfectly reasonable suggestion that would be effective and easy to do, and as far as I can tell McCain was forced to "fight" it because the other guy brought it up first. I can't off the top of my head think of any things like this going the other way. However, Obama was sort of criticized or made fun of for agreeing with Hillary in the primaries too much.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2008/08/07/tire-pressure-taunt/
Yes it's Fox News, but it was the first google hit and I'm lazy.
Ohhh, can it tell me when to move and shoot as well?
I know this is a joke, but you've clearly never played DotA
I can assure you first hand that accessing a game's internal data structures is indeed very possible.
It could actually be simpler to do it his way. Icons never move, and he already knows where they are going to be on the screen, so no need to figure out what the data under the hood looks like. While it's certainly more processor intensive, and probably less elegant, Warcraft 3 is a pretty old game, so I don't think it's a big deal for most computers to handle the extra load.
Or he could just be doing it cause it's more fun this way
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.