Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Gandhi isn't always right (Score 2, Interesting) 838

Exactly. Ghandi had the ideal conditions for his style of protest. He was not just a silly idealist, but rather a clear headed thinker. He looked for the method that would cause them to lose face at home. Iranians don't have such a situation. They are the voters who have been decieved. They are rising up and telling thier governement that they do not approve of being lied to.

They arent just comitting random acts of violence as far as I can tell. I watched a youtube video earlier where the crowd attacked a riot cop who was on a motorbike swinging a baton at the crowd. They pulled him off the bike and torched the bike. Yet they spared him any attack beyond that. In a mob situation like that it is easy to lose your humanity. The crowd could have killed him, yet they didn't. That shows to me that they are genuinely angry yet still responsible about it. Even Ghandi would have approved of this.

Comment Re:wah (Score 1) 838

Hate to break it to ya Mr. Amish guy, Oppressive rule has been around since we learned how to beat people over the head with clubs. Pollution is caused by population. And so far, only two nuclear bombs have ever been detonated. We have never had full scale nuclear war, and it looks like we never will.

Comment Re:Gandhi isn't always right (Score 5, Insightful) 838

Even Ghandi recognized the power of violence. He once said that the best kind of person to lead in his non-violent revolution was a person who had served in the military or police. You see, he recognized that even though violence was a solution, there were other ways for him to achieve his goals. He never said violence should not be used; Only that it should be a last resort. Iranians have tried the path of peace, the problem here is: You can never get a person who thinks he has god on his side to believe he is wrong.

Comment Re:New doomsday scenario? (Score -1) 383

It will be bright enough to read by at night when it does go. The neutrinos may cause an increase in cancer rates, but humanity would survive just as we always have. Depending on how long it lasts we will likely see some climate change. But again, life will go on

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1) 395

70 years after your death isn't any family you would have really known. Your grandchildren will likely die around 50 years after you die. So this is your great-grandchildren your leaving stuff to now. That doesn't make a lot of sense for locking up the culture and sure doesn't promote artists to create new works, which was the purpose of copyright.

Comment This is not a bad thing! (Score 5, Insightful) 380

This will be your chance to make some money off their commercial use of your art, a good chunk of money at that. All you have to be able to do is prove when you created the works and when they started using them.

Go get legal advice now, make sure they have actual experience in IP law.

Good luck with your new found source of revenue!

Comment Re:Cow of the future? (Score 3, Insightful) 378

The cow is dying anyways for food. Why do we need to waste it's skin just so some hippies can feel better about it. The Native Americans used to pay honor to the animals they hunted by finding a way to use every piece of the remains, letting nothing go to waste.

Besides, that's imitation leather anyways.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...