Considering that even 1080P HD is 200 lines less than the lower of the old CRT PC gaming resolutions (1600x1200 up to 2043x1536) I would say yes, the LCD was a step backwards in every area except carrying-convenience.
Parts of that story also turn up in "Bare Faced Messiah", the unauthorised biography of L. Ron Hubbard. Scientology tried to ban it, failed miserably, and now you can download it.
Fascinating stuff. Cult leaders are very interesting people.
Exactly. While OpenGL is compatible with 99% of the PC gaming market, it is compatible with 0% of the console market. D3D is compatible with 99% of the PC gaming market, and 30% (very rough estimate) of the console market. Linux and Mac aren't even a blip on the gaming market radar, so why would anybody bother with OpenGL in a marketing sense?
The few that do bother to do it in OpenGL get burned when they want to port it to the console, because instead of a simple re-package job, they have to do 10 times as much work to move to a console. It may not be a massive amount of work, no, but it is more work than necessary. That cuts into your profits. Besides, there will always be less to screw up going D3D to D3D.
Oh, they just released those. They have a 2U box with 4 servers sharing two PSUs now.
PowerEdge C6100 I think. But you're right, I remember looking at HP and the others and they did have them but they weren't the right price for us, as we didn't need density.
The US murder rate is awfully hard to break down. It includes areas like the communistic Washington D.C, where pistols have been completely illegal for decades. It also includes Texas and other states, where everyone owns a weapon. Those who are really interested in statistics might want to compare Washington D.C, New York City, Boston, or Maryland to a more gun friendly, western city.
Those of you in Europe who want to lump US crime statistics all together might want to remember that the US is almost as large as Europe. Do you lump crime statistics for Copenhagen together with those for Danzig, or Rome?
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0210e.asp
Vermont has the least restrictive gun-control law. It recognizes the right of any Vermonter who has not otherwise been prohibited from owning a firearm to carry concealed weapons without a permit or license. Yet Vermont has one of the lowest crime rates in America, ranking 49 out of 50 in all crimes and 47th in murders.
The proponents of gun control do not publish these sort of facts. They cherry pick very select statistics that seem to say what they mean for them to say. The published statistics never go into any meaningful history of the laws, or follow up on them.
*sigh*
Human nature rules here. Even scumbags have some degree of self preservation interest. They are FAR MORE likely to rape, rob, and/or kill a woman they KNOW is unarmed, rather than risk tangling with a woman who MIGHT have a Baretta in her purse. Think about it. The next time you're at a shopping center, try to imagine walking around slapping adults. Target your victims. Do you pick them based on their apparent ability and willingness to fight back?
Criminals do the same.
UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker