What is the difference?

The article at Wired.com sums it up best: "The LucasArts that died today is not the one you loved, and it was never going to be again."

It's simple really, just write a program in VB so you can backtrace it.

For an ionic liquid there should be no charge.

Vessels that had been used for making beer are identified by beer specific chemical traces on the inside of conatiners. Soot residue is a terrible indicator; and no, you do not need to place a container on the fire to boil water. You can boil water in water-tight weaved baskets by placing rocks that have come off of the fire. They hold a lot of heat and with multiple rocks you can boil for as long as you need.

Usually, products that are purchased for resale are exempt from sales tax. Sales taxes are not calculated until it is sold to the end user.
Candy purchased by a mini-mart at Costco -> no sales tax Me buying the candy bar from that mini-mart -> sales tax calculated

A business can deduct any expense that is used for the operations of running a business. Dividends are payed after taxes because paying dividends is not essential to the running of a business. Anyways, dividends are not payed out to shares held by the company.

I agree, sound like the guy has ADHD and needs some meds to help him focus. I started taking Adderall a while back and not only am I able to focus on my work, I'm able to get what's in my brain written down without it being jumbled on the way out.

Sorry to reply to my reply, but an analogy to this would be if there could be trademarks on covers of songs, Glee would have stolen his trademark.

Yes, he did a cover. However, he did a specific arrangement of the song that the show took as their own. From the opening chorus to the way the guitar is played, it's the same arrangement of Baby Got Back. I have a feeling that the music arranger for the show might be let go for getting credit where credit wasn't due.

Really? Since when? Under the current US tax law, taxes are paid on net profits (income minus expenses). An expense is the money spent on things that are necessary for the operations of a business. The more expenses you have, the lower the tax burden. More expenses than income? You pay $0 taxes and deffer the remaining expenses to future tax seasons. Fees for government inspections/registration are expenses, not taxes; they can be written off. If we want companies to grow, we need to minimize their expenses and not just by having fewer people on staff.

Dividends on stocks are paid after taxes because the payment of dividends is not essential to the running of a business. If the tax rate on businesses were to go down further, we would see an increase in dividends paid. With taxes on dividends paid at a top rate of 15% (no FICA either), that is a massive amount of taxes being avoided. The companies that are actually creating jobs are not the ones paying out dividends. The ones creating jobs are in their first five years of growth and generally paying fewer taxes. The Bush era tax cuts increased the amount of time that start-up costs for a business had to be amortirized from 5 years (for any amount) to 15 years (for any amount over $5000).

Beef heart is all muscle and no fat. Incredible when smoked for a few hours.

Don't forget to include on the site animated GIFs, a visitor counter, and moving text.

Except that public employee workers are generally paid less than their counterparts in other industries and the pension system has been paid into for every year of their work anyways. The problem stems from from three things:
1. Public employees being laid off, therefore reducing the pool paid into the pension system.
2. Retroactive changes to the pension payouts that had the optimism of a 90's internet IPO
3. "Fraud" by high level public employees, who can get away with it because of their connections in city hall and poorly written union contracts. Really no different than corporations moving money to the Cayman Island's to avoid paying taxes, it's perfectly legal but what has been the cost to this country? Or how about upper management in corporations getting paid in stock, which when sold, would be taxed as capital gains(15% in the USA)? Still perfectly legal, but now they're paying less as a percentage of their income than you are in taxes.