That's in the parts per hundred range and would be visible by just looking at the water. Iron which has an orangish brown color is rarely above 10ppm.

Even taking a strictly economical approach. Lets assume $100 of profit off every person that got cancer. Approximately 14 million people will get cancer this year that's 1.4 billion in annual profits. A pharmaceutical company is not going to shy away from that type

it's not a fake quantum computer, is simulating a quantum computer.

How does voter ID depress minority voting?

Pine phone is supposed to start shipping next week, the Librem 5 has started shipping.

What about the campaign socialists maids and gardeners?

The 117 was very stealthy, the cost to maintain stealth planes has historically been the Achilles heal of stealth technology. The 117 suffered from this, maintaining wings of these planes was expensive and the chemicals used shortened the life of many of the people that worked on it. None of the people that were dancing around the downed stealth plane are alive today because of what they inhaled. The air force didn't account for a break down in intel that would allow sam operators to queue in so quickly with their weapon bay doors open. They actually know how long it takes to lock on with and without their weapons door open and didn't account for the operators being queued to their location.

Forced sterilization? Forced one child policy? What option does not involve the government deciding who gets to reproduce?

Or you can charge your competitors for use of your patient and make money off a larger market share.

The F-117 was shot down for some simple reasons, every night they would follow the same attack route, the SAM operators knew when and where the f117 was because they knew when the 117 took off, thanks to the French. Their radar was only on for 17 seconds when they were able to detect the 117 opening it's weapons doors. It was intel that downed the 117 not a failure of stealth technology

It's difficult to have a redemption arc when there is nothing to be redeemed from.

I would be willing to bet it's an American household that spends $1300 a year on entertainment. Cable, sporting events, movies, plays, video games,... I could easily see $100 a month in expenses.

It doesn't in your high school text book but if you read more advance literature you will see it in there.

Under your Highschool capitalist model would there be employees?
How would owners pay unforeseen expenses?
Where would the money come from to grow/expand the business? The issue is that in your system any money over what was is need to survive would be "profits"

You are forgetting about risk, companies just don't pop up they have to purchase assets to run their company, that's what they are risking.

It's not as simple as high-school economics makes it out to be. Who would risk their capitol in a company where they would not see a return on their investment?

Would you invest or start a company if there was no profits? If so I have a special investment opportunity for you. In a perfect market profit margin is a reflection of the risk to assets. That is why the corporate tax rate is lower then the individual rate, assets are at risk.