Comment Re: Human Societies ? (Score 3, Insightful) 199
So you're saying that the number 20 is intrinsically superior to the number 70. Your argument could use some work.
So you're saying that the number 20 is intrinsically superior to the number 70. Your argument could use some work.
The US pint is two cups or sixteen ounces from Alaska to Florida; it doesn't change from person to person. Which means it is standardized. You may quibble over the standard for a pint varying internationally but our measurements do not vary.
Untrue. Fahrenheit has smaller degrees so you never need to involve a decimal place. Also, zero to 100 on the scale fitting nicely with temperatures humans can function in without being extra vigilant means something in day to day life, while the boiling point of water does not.
Even our barbarian units have standardized values. That's not what TFA is talking about.
On a side note though, Fahrenheit is far superior to Celsius unless you're dealing with the precise boiling point of water more often than you're dealing with human comfort regarding air temperatures.
Telling people the most widely human-used anti-parasitic on the planet is "horse medicine" to keep them from considering it *isn't* dangerous misinformation? The reason that lie was spread is because you can not EUA a drug in the US if there is any valid alternative treatment that *has* been properly tested.
You don't need a medical degree to have a valid aversion when they get caught outright lying to you on pretty much every significant claim they made.
Your idea of "tested" does not live up to even garage scientific standards. The testing should have been large scale, double blind, and have lasted long enough to at least determine if there might be non-immediate side effects. None of the above were true. Human trials weren't just not double blind, they weren't even single blind; part of the way through they told every test subject which group they were in and switched them to the vaccine.
But you don't care about the truth, you just don't want your religion blasphemed.
If wind power were carbon negative, sure. Unfortunately none of the designs in use right now are. They aren't capable of producing enough energy over their lifespans right now to be anything but an expensive lie, because it takes more energy to get one created and installed than it produces before it breaks and gets sent to a landfill.
The difference being that you may be that toddler's daddy but you're most definitely not mine. And neither is Uncle Sam.
Of course there was frequent criticism of
And, yeah, I remember our discussions about what should be done about people saying things you disagreed with. You can play all virtuous and shit over here if you like but the truth is that over there you were asking us to create you an echo chamber by burning all heretics. You are not the good guy, you are a wannabe tyrant.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion