Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Driving is a hard AI problem (Score 2) 370

Autonomous driving is a hard AI problem with a lot of constraints and the capacity to actually kill people, both in the car and outside, so it must be taken very seriously. The mere idea of privately-developed, close-source software driving tons of hardware at highway speed without supervision is enough to evoke nightmares.

AI has made a lot of progress lately. Somewhat hardish AI problems that we can solve today are in the order of facial recognition, language translation, categorising the content of images, helping with the diagnosis of some illnesses like skin cancer, etc. These are incredibly useful, but notice that they still have a non-zero error rate. The current state of the art on ImageNet for picture recognition is in the ordre of 3%, and they are relatively easy to fool. If you have ever used google translate, you must know its limitations.

Autonomous cars need to have a precise image of their surrounding up to a few hundred meters in all conditions (day, night, wet, etc), very frequently updated, and they need to be able to anticipate other drivers as well as other hazards on the road. The technology is simply not there yet, even with the 70k$ sensors that Waymo uses.

We all want this technology to be here and to be better than humans at driving. This sounds easy since most of us drivers think everyone else drives like an idiot, however, the fatality rate in cars is in the order of 1 death per 100 million miles travelled. This is actually very low. This presents a challenge to the autonomous driving research community, because to certify that their system is actually better than humans, they will have to travel significantly more than hundreds of millions of miles, in real, not simulated or recorded conditions. The cost of doing this is astronomical, and it must be done everytime a new version comes out.

Trusting this software is going to be very hard in practice.

Source: RAND corp.

Comment Re:Thatâ(TM)s why Iâ(TM)m a farmer (Score 1) 192

15$ without benefits (health insurance, retirement, etc) comes to 2500$ per month if working 40h week. Doing much more than that is hard if you are truly developing. Then you have to pay for health insurance, and save for retirement. Your net pay will end up being be far less than 1500 euros.

Comment This is a PET/CT scanner, for functional imaging (Score 1) 54

Full body PET/CT scanners already exist but they can only scan slice-by-slice. This one creates an image in real-time of the whole body in 3D.

PET scanning is invasive because it requires the injection of a radioactive tracer. The scanner actually records simultaneous gamma-ray disintegrations. There are many available tracers allowing to measure for instance glucose metabolism, which is great for oncology (cancer medicine). This is currently the most precise way to detect many cancer lesions, particularly lymphoma, cancers of the lymphatic system. Other tracers can be used to measure for instance blood perfusion.

This scanner is also interesting because it is less wasteful with gamma photons. This means that less tracer can be injected for the same image quality.

Comment Re:It's Matlab in python clothing (Score 1) 58

Not quite.

- I'm not aware that you can typeset whole documents, including mathematics, in the Matlab UI. see nbviewer website
- I'm not aware that you can do slideshow presentations in Matlab, using something as simple as markdown.
- Plots and graphics are not embeddable in the Matlab command line.

On the other hand you can use Matlab as a GUI builder, which you cannot do as easily with Jupyter. see dashboards in jupyter

Comment Probably for the best (Score 1) 189

I've been using Apple routers for a long time with mixed results. The express line is simple but not fast or very robust. ISP provide their own wifi routers now, so why bother? My time capsules have always failed (typically shortly after the warranty period expired) so now I'm just using a large NAS.

Comment Re:As opposed to... (Score 2) 173

How many billion miles travelled per day? The relevant statistic is the number of fatalities per billion miles (or km) traveled. See here. We don't know for sure the relevant statistics for driver-assisted vehicles.

There is a very good chance that driver assistance is going to improve the fatalities statistics, but this needs to be done correctly.

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...